Decision on Origin Sample Clauses

Decision on Origin. 1. If as a result of questions put or visits made to the exporter or producer the requesting Party is satisfied the goods about which those questions were put or visits made are originating goods pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter, it shall permit preferential access for those goods.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Decision on Origin. 1. If as a result of questions put or visits made to the exporter or producer the requesting Party is satisfied the goods about which those questions were put or visits made are originating goods pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter, it shall permit preferential access for those goods. 2. Preferential tariff treatment may be denied if: (a) the goods do not or did not meet the requirements of this Chapter; (b) the exporter or producer fails to respond fully to questions put by the customs administration of the importing Party within 60 days of the date of the request of the importing Party, or such other extended period of time as may be specified by the customs administrations of the importing Party, but not more than an additional 30 days; (c) the requested customs administration is, for any reason, unable to comply with a request from the customs administration of the importing Party to verify the origin of goods and advises the requesting customs administration of this inability or, fails to respond to a request within 90 days; or (d) the exporter or producer does not agree to a visit by the customs administration of the importing Party within 30 days. 3. In the event preferential tariff treatment is denied the importing Party shall ensure that its customs administration provides in writing to the exporter, the importer or producer, as the case may be, full reasons for that decision. 4. Where verifications by a Party indicate a pattern of conduct by an exporter or a producer of false or unsupported representations that a good imported into its territory qualifies as an originating good, the Party may withhold preferential tariff treatment to identical goods exported or produced by such a person until it is satisfied that the exporter or producer is no longer making false or unsupported representations as to origin.
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Decision on Origin

  • COOPERATION ON FRAUD 25.1. The Parties agree that they shall cooperate with one another to investigate, minimize and take corrective action in cases of fraud. The Parties’ fraud minimization procedures are to be cost effective and implemented so as not to unduly burden or harm one party as compared to the other.

  • Cooperation on Safety The Employer and Union will cooperate in continuing and perfecting regulations which will afford adequate protection to employees engaged in hazardous areas.

  • Limitation on Publication The Contractor shall not publish or submit for publication any article, press release, or other writing relating to the Contractor's services for the Judicial Council without prior review and written permission by the Judicial Council.

  • Policies, Guidelines, Directives and Standards Either the Funder or the Ministry will give the HSP Notice of any amendments to the manuals, guidelines or policies identified in Schedule C. An amendment will be effective in accordance with the terms of the amendment. By signing a copy of this Agreement the HSP acknowledges that it has a copy of the documents identified in Schedule C.

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • Provide Data In Compliance With Laws LEA shall provide data for the purposes of the DPA in compliance with the FERPA, PPRA, IDEA, 603 C.M.R. 23.00, 603 CMR 28.00, and Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 71, Sections 34D to 34H, and the other privacy statutes quoted in this DPA. LEA shall ensure that its annual notice under FERPA includes vendors, such as the Provider, as “School Officials.”

  • Limitation on Warranties Client and Spirent agree that the services are provided “as is” and “as available” and that Spirent makes no warranty as to the services. Spirent disclaims all other warranties, either express or implied, including, without limitation, warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Spirent does not warrant the work performed by client or third-party contractors or that any systems or operation of systems will be defect or error-free.

  • Representation on Authority of Parties/Signatories Each person signing this Agreement represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized and has legal capacity to execute and deliver this Agreement. Each Party represents and warrants to the other that the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance of such Party’s obligations hereunder have been duly authorized and that this Agreement is a valid and legal agreement binding on such Party and enforceable in accordance with its terms.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!