Departmental Evaluation of Tenured Faculty Sample Clauses

Departmental Evaluation of Tenured Faculty. Tenured faculty members will be evaluated by a committee of their departmental peers, excluding the Department Chairperson, during each spring semester. The size and composition of the Peer Evaluation Committee will be determined by each department consistent with the number of faculty members in a department. The Peer Evaluation Committee will select a chairperson who will prepare a summary of the evaluation and provide the faculty member and the Department Chairperson with copies. The evaluation and summary will assess the faculty member's performance since the previous evaluation, including efforts to fulfill goals and plans established at the previous evaluation, and will discuss goals and plans for the next year. In departments where the Department Chairperson is tenured, the Department Chairperson will prepare a written statement indicating whether he or she agrees or disagrees with the evaluation. In departments where the Department Chairperson is untenured, the Xxxx will prepare a written statement indicating whether he or she agrees or disagrees with the evaluation. The faculty member may indicate, in writing, any differing opinion about the content of the Peer Evaluation Committee's summary and/or the statement of the Department Chairperson or Xxxx. Such written opinion will become part of the summary statement. The Department and faculty member will each retain a copy of the summary statement. By April 30 of each year, the Department Chairperson will forward all evaluations to the Xxxx, and certify that they have been completed, or explain the reason(s) for any missing evaluations. By May 31 of each year, the Xxxx will forward all evaluations to the Xxxxxxx and Vice President for Academic Affairs for inclusion in the faculty members' official personnel files.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Departmental Evaluation of Tenured Faculty

  • Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders 2.24.1 The Procuring entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22

  • EVALUATION OF TEACHERS 1. All reports on the work of a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Evaluation of Teaching 1. All reports on a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

  • Evaluation of Students Acknowledging the District’s adopted grading system, the teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of a student. No grade or evaluation shall be changed except by the teacher with the approval of the building administrator.

  • Departmental Review If informal resolution of the problem through conciliation and negotiation cannot be effected, an aggrieved person may file a formal complaint with the departmental affirmative action coordinator or other designated official. Such a complaint must be filed on a form provided for this purpose and within five working days after the attempted resolution of the problem by the equal employment opportunity counselor or within twenty-five (25) working days after the date of the alleged discriminatory action, whichever shall first occur. The affirmative action coordinator will decide whether the complaint falls within the jurisdiction of the procedure and accept or reject it. Upon acceptance of the complaint, the affirmative action coordinator shall obtain the notes on the case from the equal employment opportunity counselor; may conduct a prompt, impartial investigation if he deems it necessary; shall explore the possibility of resolving the problem through negotiation or conciliation; shall present findings and recommendations on resolving the complaint to the agency/department head; and within forty-five (45) working days from the date the formal complaint was filed, shall present his written decision, as approved by the agency/department head, to the complainant, with a copy of the complaint and decision to be forwarded to the director of personnel.

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be:

  • Supervision and Evaluation The Dutch educational institution and the internship employer will both appoint internship supervisors who will be responsible for supervising the intern. If problems arise, the two internship supervisors will contact each other. There will be an interim evaluation and a final evaluation. The parties will agree on what shape these evaluations will take. At the end of the internship, the Dutch educational institution will require a report from the intern. The requirements of the report will be known by the student before the internship begins. The internship employer will be presented with a copy of this report. The internship employer will present the intern with an evaluation of his/her internship.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.