Peer Evaluation Committee. The faculty of a department may develop a procedure for peers to evaluate the performance of faculty members provided that the development of such procedure must be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of this Agreement. This procedure shall identify how departmental faculty will be involved in the process, how the faculty member will receive feedback on the peer evaluation, and whether the evaluation will be included in the faculty member’s official evaluation file.
Peer Evaluation Committee. See (13.6.C.)
Peer Evaluation Committee. A Peer Evaluation Committee shall be formed, which shall consist of two members and one alternate from the bargaining unit. The purpose of the Committee shall be to recommend the amount of the annual merit-based increases as provided for in Fiscal Year 2004-2005, 2005-2006 and 2006-2007. The operating parameters of the Committee will be formalized through a side letter of agreement once an agreement as to the parameters is reached.
Peer Evaluation Committee. The peer evaluation committee recognizes that satisfactory performance by a faculty member can be achieved in a variety of ways.
Peer Evaluation Committee. A Peer Evaluation Committee, whose parameters are set forth below, shall recommend the amount of the annual merit-based increases. This Committee will not meet for the duration of this negotiated Agreement. The Committee shall be comprised of two regular members and one alternate member (collectively referred to as the “Committee Members” unless otherwise specified). The alternate member shall serve for the purpose of recommending the amount of the annual merit- based increases for each of the two regular members. Doctors Council shall designate both the regular members and alternate member of the Committee and will notify Student Health Services of the identity of the members and any such changes in the membership.
Peer Evaluation Committee. A three-person peer evaluation committee shall consist of faculty chosen as follows: two faculty members shall be chosen by the person to be evaluated. At least two of the three members on the committee shall be tenured, except that a Tenure Review Committee shall be composed of three tenured faculty members from the division. The third member of the committee shall be a tenured faculty member chosen by the Division Director and shall serve as the chair of the committee. It is preferable that all members of the peer evaluation committee be tenured and from the same division as the faculty member being evaluated.
Peer Evaluation Committee. The faculty of a department may develop a 598 procedure for peers to evaluate the performance of faculty members provided that 599 the development of such procedure must be accomplished in accordance with the 600 provisions of Article 9 of this Agreement. This procedure shall identify how 601 departmental faculty will be involved in the process, how the faculty member will 602 receive feedback on the peer evaluation, and whether the evaluation will be 603 included in the faculty member’s official evaluation file. 604
Peer Evaluation Committee
