Peer Evaluation Committee Sample Clauses

The Peer Evaluation Committee clause establishes a group of individuals, typically composed of colleagues or peers within an organization, who are responsible for assessing the performance, conduct, or qualifications of a member. This committee may review cases such as promotions, disciplinary actions, or professional development, and their evaluations often inform final decisions by higher authorities. The core function of this clause is to ensure that assessments are fair, balanced, and informed by those with relevant expertise, thereby promoting transparency and objectivity in organizational decision-making.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Peer Evaluation Committee. The faculty of a department may develop a procedure for peers to evaluate the performance of faculty members provided that the development of such procedure must be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of this Agreement. This procedure shall identify how departmental faculty will be involved in the process, how the faculty member will receive feedback on the peer evaluation, and whether the evaluation will be included in the faculty member’s official evaluation file.
View SourceView Similar (10)
Peer Evaluation Committee. A Peer Evaluation Committee shall be formed, which shall consist of two members and one alternate from the bargaining unit. The purpose of the Committee shall be to recommend the amount of the annual merit-based increases as provided for in Fiscal Year 2004-2005, 2005-2006 and 2006-2007. The operating parameters of the Committee will be formalized through a side letter of agreement once an agreement as to the parameters is reached.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Peer Evaluation Committee. The Peer Evaluation Committee recognizes that satisfactory performance by a faculty member can be achieved in a variety of ways. (1) The Peer Evaluation Committee has the responsibility to observe and evaluate a faculty member’s total performance of duties and responsibilities as well as classroom teaching. Therefore, every contract faculty member shall be evaluated by a peer evaluation committee. (2) A peer evaluation committee’s evaluation of a faculty member shall include the following: a review of the self-evaluation of the faculty member; a classroom or clinical visitation; an observation of counseling sessions; an observation of librarians; the results of the student evaluation; the fulfillment of on-the-job responsibilities as indicated in Section 18.2.3; and evidence of effective working relationships with staff and students. (3) A peer evaluation committee evaluation is part of the total evaluation process and shall cover the period of time since the last evaluation. An additional peer evaluation committee evaluation may be conducted if the professional effectiveness of the faculty member is less than satisfactory. (4) Composition of the Committee: a) The composition of the Peer Evaluation Committee shall be two regular tenured faculty members. b) The evaluatee shall name one peer, and the first-level manager shall name one more. In the event that no peer or subject specialist is available at the District to serve on the peer committee, it is the District's responsibility to secure such services. The selection of the peer or subject specialist shall be done in consultation with the evaluatee.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Peer Evaluation Committee. The Peer Evaluation Committee recognizes that satisfactory performance by a faculty member can be achieved in a variety of ways. (1) The Peer Evaluation Committee has the responsibility to observe and evaluate a faculty member’s total performance of duties and responsibilities as well as classroom teaching. Therefore, every regular faculty member shall be evaluated by a peer evaluation committee. (2) A peer evaluation committee’s evaluation of a faculty member shall include the following: a review of the self-evaluation of the faculty member; classroom or clinical visitation; observation of counseling sessions; observation of librarians; the results of the student evaluation; fulfillment of on-the-job responsibilities as indicated in Section 18.2.3; and evidence of effective working relationships with staff and students. (3) A peer evaluation committee evaluation is part of the total evaluation process and shall cover the period of time since the last evaluation. An additional peer evaluation committee evaluation may be conducted if the professional effectiveness of the faculty member is less than satisfactory.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Peer Evaluation Committee. See (13.6.C.)
View Source
Peer Evaluation Committee. A three-person peer evaluation committee shall consist of faculty chosen as follows: two faculty members shall be chosen by the person to be evaluated. At least two of the three members on the committee shall be tenured, except that a Tenure Review Committee shall be composed of three tenured faculty members from the division. The third member of the committee shall be a tenured faculty member chosen by the Division Director and shall serve as the chair of the committee. It is preferable that all members of the peer evaluation committee be tenured and from the same division as the faculty member being evaluated.
View Source
Peer Evaluation Committee. A Peer Evaluation Committee, whose parameters are set forth below, shall recommend the amount of the annual merit-based increases. This Committee will not meet for the duration of this negotiated Agreement. The Committee shall be comprised of two regular members and one alternate member (collectively referred to as the “Committee Members” unless otherwise specified). The alternate member shall serve for the purpose of recommending the amount of the annual merit- based increases for each of the two regular members. Doctors Council shall designate both the regular members and alternate member of the Committee and will notify Student Health Services of the identity of the members and any such changes in the membership.
View Source
Peer Evaluation Committee. The faculty of a department may develop a 604
View Source
Peer Evaluation Committee 
View SourceView Similar (7)

Related to Peer Evaluation Committee

  • Evaluation Committee A. The Association and the Board agree to establish a standing joint Evaluation Committee comprised of members of the District Leadership Council for the purpose of evaluating the policy, procedure and process for the evaluation of certified teachers in the District.

  • Selection Committee A. Each building site will appoint a selection committee for the TLS. The committee shall be comprised of equal numbers of teachers and administrators and at least one teacher will be appointed by the Des Moines Education Association. B. The committee will accept and review application for a TLS position and will make recommendations to the hiring administrator. In developing recommendations, the committee will utilize measures of teacher effectiveness and professional growth, consider the needs of the school district and review the performance and professional development of the applicants. Teachers who are selected must meet all of the qualification contained in the TLS grant and contained in the law.

  • Compensation Committee (A) The Compensation Committee shall be composed of not more than five (5) members who shall be selected by the Board of Directors from its own members who are not officers of the Company and who shall hold office during the pleasure of the Board. (B) The Compensation Committee shall in general advise upon all matters of policy concerning the Company brought to its attention by the management and from time to time review the management of the Company, major organizational matters, including salaries and employee benefits and specifically shall administer the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. (C) Meetings of the Compensation Committee may be called at any time by the Chairman of the Compensation Committee, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or the President of the Company.

  • TRANSITION COMMITTEE A transition committee comprised of the employee representatives and the employer representatives, including the Crown, will be established by January 31, 2016 to address all matters that may arise in the creation of the Trust.

  • Union Committee ‌ The Union shall appoint and maintain a Committee comprising persons who are employees of the Employer, and/or the Senior Union Official, or her/his representative, which shall be known as the Union Committee. The Union at all times shall keep the Employer informed of the individual membership of the Committee.