EVALUATION OF TEACHERS. 1. All reports on the work of a teacher shall be in writing.
2. At least two (2) weeks before commencing the evaluation process, the evaluator shall meet with the teacher and discuss the purposes of the evaluation, the approximate time span, the schedule of observations, and clarify and review the criteria to be used.
3. The criteria to be used are attached to and form part of this Collective Agreement. (See Appendix G).
4. Not less than three (3) nor more than six (6) formal classroom observations which reflect the teacher's assignment shall be conducted in completing the reporting process. Observations outside of these limits are subject to the approval of the Union.
5. Periods chosen for observation shall reflect the teacher’s assignment and the teacher shall have the opportunity to select two (2) of the observation times.
6. Following each formal observation, the evaluator shall discuss with the teacher his/her observations and impressions. Such observations and impressions shall further be provided to the teacher in the form of a written anecdotal statement within five (5) working days of the observation.
7. Reports shall be prepared by the Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent or Administrative Officers.
8. The content of a teaching report shall be a specific, objective description of the work of a teacher and the learning situation in the teacher’s class, based on the criteria attached to this Agreement. The content of a Teacher Evaluation Report shall be based on the personal observations on the work of the teacher and the learning situation in the teacher’s class by the evaluator. In the evaluation of teachers in specialized assignments the evaluator may consult with a resource person as permitted by Section 20(3) of the School Act.
9. The report shall reflect those aspects of the teaching and learning situation which can reasonably be expected to be within the teacher’s responsibility and control.
10. The teacher shall be given a draft copy of a report at least 72 hours prior to preparation of the final copy. He/she shall have the opportunity of meeting with the evaluator in the company of another member of the Union to discuss, and if appropriate, propose changes to the draft.
11. Any written report that is satisfactory and that identifies weaknesses shall include constructive suggestions for improvements. The teacher shall be jointly involved in the development of any necessary plan of assistance.
12. In each case of a less than satisfactory...
EVALUATION OF TEACHERS. 1. Three options are available for teacher evaluation:
a. regular evaluation;
b. confirmatory evaluation; or
c. professional growth plan.
2. A regular evaluation of a teacher shall occur:
a. in the first full year of the appointment;
b. following the request for a regular evaluation report by a teacher; or
c. as determined by the superintendent.
3. A confirmatory evaluation may occur at the request of the teacher after the first full year of appointment where, in the opinion of the evaluator responsible for the evaluation, the teacher is continuing to give more satisfactory service to the district.
4. Teachers will develop and/or review professional growth plans annually unless they are receiving a regular or confirmatory evaluation in which case the professional growth plan is an option.
5. Where a regular or confirmatory evaluation will occur, the terms of this article shall apply to the conduct of those evaluations.
6. The superintendent (or designate) shall notify, by October 15 of each school year, those teachers who are to receive a regular evaluation. Teachers who request a regular or confirmatory evaluation must notify their administrative officer by October 15.
7. Regular evaluation:
a. Two (2) weeks in advance of the start of the evaluation process a pre-evaluation conference shall be held and the evaluator shall meet with the teacher to discuss the purpose of the evaluation, the approximate time span and the criteria to be used. The teacher shall be furnished with a copy of this evaluation procedure.
b. The process shall include:
i. a series of observations each followed by an observation conference;
ii. a post evaluation conference for review of the draft report;
iii. preparation of a final report;
iv. an opportunity for the teacher to submit a written commentary to be attached to the final report; and
v. filing of the final report.
c. A teacher evaluation report may be prepared on the teacher’s general performance in the school and the learning situation in the teacher’s classroom.
d. Reports shall reflect any significant discrepancy between the teacher’s assignment, professional training and preference of teaching subjects and grades. It is the teacher’s responsibility to bring these concerns to the attention of the evaluator.
e. The evaluation procedure shall include at least three (3) comprehensive classroom visits which reflect the teacher’s major area of assignment. The teacher and the evaluator shall select the initial two (2) observatio...
EVALUATION OF TEACHERS. A satisfactory evaluation constitutes a recommendation, in accordance with Article E.27.6.
EVALUATION OF TEACHERS. 1. All reports on the work of a teacher shall be in writing.
2. At least ten (10) working days prior to commencing observations, unless otherwise requested by the teacher, the evaluator shall meet with the teacher and seek agreement on the purposes of the evaluation, the time-span and schedule of observations, and the criteria and standards to be applied. The criteria shall be in writing and shall be consistent with those generally accepted by the teaching profession.
3. No criteria shall be applied which relate to aspects of the teaching/learning situation over which the teacher does not have both responsibility and control.
4. Each report shall be based on not less than three (3) nor more than six (6) formal observations which reflect the teacher’s assignment unless otherwise requested by the teacher.
5. Involvement or non-involvement in extra-curricular activities, participation in Union activities, or matters not directly related to teaching duties are outside the scope of evaluating and reporting on the work of a teacher.
EVALUATION OF TEACHERS. (L)
1. Formative Evaluation
a. The purpose of formative evaluation of teaching is to maintain and improve the quality of instruction.
b. Formative evaluation shall consist of an ongoing review of all aspects of a teacher's professional practice. Any written report which shall result from formative evaluation shall be shared only between the evaluator and the teacher and shall outline strengths and areas for professional growth. The teacher shall be responsible for setting goals and developing plans for improving their professional practice.
c. Formative evaluation shall be conducted on a continuing basis for all teachers employed by the Board.
d. The evaluator and the teacher shall mutually develop the process of formative evaluation and the specific criteria which shall be consistent with Article E.27.3.
EVALUATION OF TEACHERS. 1. All reports on the work of a teacher shall be in writing.
2. Before commencing observations, the evaluator shall meet with the teacher and discuss the purposes of the evaluation, the approximate time span and schedule of observations and the criteria and standards to be applied. The evaluator, in consultation with the teacher being evaluated, will identify and clarify the criteria and area(s) of expertise to be used in the evaluation.
3. Not fewer than three (3) nor more than six (6) formal classroom observations which reflect the teacher's assignment, shall be conducted in completing the report process unless mutually agreed.
4. Periods chosen for observation shall be during normal periods of the school year and the teacher shall have the opportunity to select two (2) observation times.
5. Following each observation, the evaluator shall discuss with the teacher his/her observations and impressions. Such observations and impressions shall further be provided to the teacher in the form of a written anecdotal statement within a reasonable time of the observation.
6. Reports shall be prepared only by evaluators authorized under Section 5(1) and 5(6)
EVALUATION OF TEACHERS. 11.1. The evaluation of the performance of each teacher in the school system is the responsibility of the administration. In such evaluations, all monitoring or observations of teachers shall be conducted openly.
11.2. Evaluations shall only be conducted by a building Principal, assistant Principal, or other administrator as designated by the Board of Education. Each written review of the teacher's job performance shall be based on at least thirty (30) accumulated minutes of classroom observation.
11.3. The performance of all teachers shall be evaluated in writing as follows:
1. Probationary teachers shall be evaluated in writing at least two (2) times each year; once on or before December 1 and again on or before March 15. A personal meeting will be held within fifteen (15) school days thereafter to review the job performance of the probationary teacher.
2. Tenure teachers shall be evaluated in writing at least once every two years on or before May 1. A personal meeting will be held with each tenure teacher within fifteen (15) school days thereafter to review his/her job performance.
11.4. Three (3) copies of the written evaluation shall be submitted to the teacher, all to be signed by both the administrator conducting the evaluation and the teacher being evaluated. Two copies are to be returned to the administration. The third copy will to be retained by the teacher. In the event that the teacher feels that his/her evaluation was incomplete or unjust, the teacher may put any objections in writing and have them attached to the evaluation report to be placed in his/her evaluation file.
11.5. If an administrator believes a teacher is doing unacceptable work, the reasons therefore shall be set forth in the written evaluation and contain specific recommendations for improvement of the teacher's performance. At least sixty (60) days before the close of each school year the Board shall provide a probationary teacher with a definite written statement as to whether or not the teacher’s work has been satisfactory.
EVALUATION OF TEACHERS. A. All observations by a supervisor of the work performance of a teacher in a classroom shall be made openly.
B. When a supervisor enters a classroom of a teacher engaged in teaching it will be assumed the teacher is being observed for purposes which may include evaluation.
C. When a supervisor makes and signs a written evaluation of a teacher it will be shown to the teacher, who will acknowledge receipt thereof in writing; this shall not necessarily be interpreted to indicate the teacher's assent; if the teacher disagrees with all or any part of the evaluation the teacher may file written comments in the teacher's personnel file. There shall be no obligation to respond to the teacher's comments and a non-response shall not be interpreted to indicate agreement with the teacher's comments.
D. All evaluations will be in accordance with the evaluation forms and procedures adopted in the Professional Development Master Plan prior to the start of a school year.
EVALUATION OF TEACHERS. [Note: See also Article C.3 Evaluation]
1. a. Reports shall be prepared only by evaluators authorized by the School Act and Regulations, and shall be prepared independently and without collaboration.
EVALUATION OF TEACHERS. Where the teacher’s performance has been assessed as less than satisfactory, a plan of assistance shall be developed. The plan shall include observations and assistance by resource persons external to the school. Membership in the plan of assistance team shall be determined in consultation with the ATU President or designate.
