Evaluation of Applications. 18.1. The Employer will consider the application, conduct an evaluation using the health practitioner work level evaluation manual and work level statements and determine the appropriate classification level for that position.
18.2. Where there is an incumbent, the outcome of the job evaluation process will be reported to the individual employee and work unit manager.
Evaluation of Applications. Applications for professional development leave will be evaluated by the University on the basis of the criteria in Articles 20.01, 20.02 and 20.03 and in the order in which they are received in the office of the Associate Vice-President of Human Resources. Applicants will be advised in writing by the University by March 31 of each year (except in unusual circumstances) whether the professional development leave can be granted. If an application cannot be granted under Article 20.03
(a) considerations, the University may offer the leave in a subsequent year. The University will provide the Association with a report on the first working day in July of each year of the applications for professional development leave received and the status of each application.
Evaluation of Applications. If the application is developed and processed in accordance with § 1980.113 of subpart B of part 1980 of this chapter, the provi- sions outlined in § 1980.114 of subpart B of part 1980 of this chapter applies with the following exceptions:
(i) Timeframe requirements for the evaluation of applications and ref- erences to the Approved Lender Pro- gram are not applicable.
(ii) County Committee reviews of ap- plications processed under this section will not be required. If the loan ap- proval official finds the applicant is not eligible, the applicant will be noti- fied in writing of the reasons for dis- approval and the opportunity given for an appeal as set out in subpart B of part 1900 of this chapter.
Evaluation of Applications. The Screening Committee will evaluate applications and recommend action to the President. The Committee’s evaluation and recommendation will be based solely on the merit of the application as it applies to the purpose of sabbatical leave stated in Xxxxxxx 0, Xxxxxxx.
Evaluation of Applications. Once the terms of validity of the notice have elapsed, the Head of AICS office in Nairobi assesses the admissibility of the applications regarding the presence of the essential requirements and the absence of causes for exclusion. The exclusion is communicated to the candidates concerned. Subsequently, the Head of AICS field Office appoints a Commission composed of three members, who meets the requirements for autonomy and impartiality with respect to the candidates. The Commitee assesses the merits of applications by assigning a maximum overall score of 100 points according to the following criteria:
Evaluation of Applications. Age will not be considered (provided that the applicant has the capacity to enter into a binding contract) unless the applicant is elderly (62 years or older) and age is a favorable factor. · Prosper will not make assumptions about the likelihood a person will bear or rear children and will, for that reason, receive diminished or interrupted income in the future. · A telephone in the applicant’s residence may be considered, but not whether it is listed in the applicant’s name. · Prosper will not discount or exclude income from consideration because it comes from part-time employment or is an annuity, pension, or other retirement benefit. The amount and probable continuance of any income may be considered. · Where credit history is normally considered, the credit history must be considered, when applicable, of accounts the applicant and the applicant’s spouse are both contractually liable for or both permitted to use. In addition, upon the applicant’s request, any account reported in the name of the applicant’s spouse or former spouse that reflects the applicant’s creditworthiness must be considered. The applicant, on request, may also present any information that tends to indicate that the credit history being considered does not accurately reflect the applicant’s creditworthiness. · Xxxxxxx may consider whether an applicant is a permanent resident of the United States, immigration status, and any additional information necessary to ascertain rights and remedies regarding repayment.
Evaluation of Applications. The Screening Committee will evaluate applications 2 and recommend action to the Vice President of Instruction prior to the March 3 meeting of the Board. The Committee’s evaluation and recommendation will be 4 based solely on the merit of the application as it applies to the purpose of sabbatical 5 leave stated in Section A, Purpose. 6
Evaluation of Applications. Evaluation Committee Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation of Applications. Applications for funds will be considered by the appropriate Xxxx according to the value of the project or plan in relationship to the individual's contractual responsibilities. In evaluating competing requests for Faculty resource development funds, or any other use of limited resources, the Xxxx, after satisfying any other relevant selection criteria contained in this Negotiated Agreement, will give priority to those requests that best enhance the District's instructional and research programs.
Evaluation of Applications. The Evaluator is obliged to evaluate the number of applications he/she has undertaken to evaluate pursuant to a Request for Assistance. Diku decides which applications are assigned to the Evaluator. For Xxxxxxx+ programmes, the Evaluator shall assess his/her impartiality against the following regulation: Article 57 (Conflicts of interest) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union (Reg. No. 966/2012):*
1. Financial actors and other persons involved in budget implementation and management, including acts preparatory thereto, audit or control shall not take any action which may bring their own interests into conflict with those of the Union. Where such a risk exists, the person in question shall refrain from such action and shall refer the matter to the responsible person at [Diku] who shall confirm in writing whether a conflict of interests exists. Where a conflict of interest is found to exist, the person in question shall cease all activities in the matter. The responsible person at [Diku] shall take any further appropriate action.
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, a conflict of interest exists where the impartial and objective exercise of the functions of a financial actor or other person, as referred to in paragraph 1, is compromised for reasons involving family, emotional life, political or national affinity, economic interest or any other shared interest with a recipient.
