Final Considerations. The work presented in this paper proposes two area- optimized FPGA structures for the computation of the Xxxxxxxxxx modular multiplication algorithm for generic primes, targeting low–power IGLOO® 2 FPGAs from Mi- crosemi. The proposed structures impose a very low usage of the available FPGA resources while still achieving good performances. To achieve this performance with a low area, the Math Blocks and embedded memories were used to- gether with a careful scheduling to assure a full pipeline usage and a low number of computation cycles. While the first structure achieves the lowest area, the second one allows to approximately half the computation time at the cost of twice the amount of embedded memories and Math Blocks and only 35% more LUTs and registers.
Final Considerations. Employment contracts may have post- employment obligations and covenants, and companies sometimes enforce these restrictive covenants through the equity awards by the forfeiture of unpaid equity awards or the clawback of such awards in case of breach of covenants. Furthermore, SOX and Xxxx-Xxxxx also include claw- back provisions that require executives to surrender the vested equity awards under certain circumstances.
Final Considerations. In the event of a significant change in the number of investors, as a result of an event resolved upon by the company, Bradesco reserves the right to review service prices, by mutual agreement with the issuer.
Final Considerations. Some final reflections on the Matrix can better explain its contents. First, we consider the structure and function of the matrix.
Final Considerations. 21.1. This MOU, which will also be referred to as “NATO SFA XXX Operational MOU”, consists of twenty-one Sections and seven annexes. The Annexes are integral parts of this MOU.
21.2. References to NATO policy documents will encapsulate any amendment thereof, or, as the case may be, refer to such policy documents as may replace them.
21.3. This MOU is signed in one original in the English language. The original of this MOU will be deposited with the FN, which will transmit certified copies to each of the Participants and HQ SACT, as well as the NATO SFA XXX itself.
Final Considerations. Volunteer service work for the Bright Futures scholarship must be volunteer work and prohibits any student from receiving remuneration or academic credit for such work
Final Considerations. 11.1 The law governing the General Conditions as well as agreements between the Parties shall be the law of Poland. The Polish Civil Code shall apply to matters not governed herein.
11.2 Any and all deviations from the General Conditions shall be made in writing, or else shall be null and void. In the case of discrepancies between these General Conditions and the conditions of an agreement between the Parties, the selling conditions agreed contractually by the Parties shall prevail.
11.3 The Parties shall seek to resolve any disputes under the agreements covered by these General Conditions amicably. If no amicable resolution is reached, the court competent for the dispute shall be the court having jurisdiction over the Seller’s registered office.
Final Considerations. This Memorandum of Understanding does not create rights or obligations under international or domestic law. In particular, nothing in this Memorandum represents a commitment of financing for either Side. The Sides should endeavour to ensure that any information exchanged under this MoU and all activities undertaken pursuant to this MoU are consistent with their policies and procedures on the disclosure of information. In addition, both Sides may make this MoU publicly available.
Final Considerations. To cap this work, the possible constraints to the research method used are introduced and, considering these very constraints, the major conclusions are presented, as well as their possible developments from this analysis. Considering the specific features of the U-C relationship and the variable of governmental intervention in the sector, on its own this poses constraints to this controversial field of study, based on diverging concepts by their nature and shape, fraught with diversified ideological, social, political, economical and structural standpoints. Another finding that limits the outcomes from this research is related to the fact that the data collected, the analyses done on them, as well as the conclusions taken will be restricted to the cross-section established at the outset, which should not be extrapolated to other situations or either regional or functional relationships. The very methodology used for gathering data, based on descriptive-exploratory research has limitations of its own. The first among the specific objectives in this study was to understand what are, and how they are formulated, the strategies proposed by higher education institutions and the corporate practice, as well as to analyze how these focal players are managing to overcome the barriers identified as constraints to the interaction between them, in the process of converting knowledge into social wealth. Our study focused the analysis of the relationship between a HES and a CE and, as an answer to the questions posed, it may be considered that: (i) the access to resources, knowledge, and all aspects that complement the U-C relationship may optimize it, minimizing uncertainty in the innovation environment;
Final Considerations. We have presented a Circus model of FMI with focus on the behavioural and reactive aspects of master algorithms and FMUs. Our model enables us first to verify that implementations of master algorithms are conformant with the restrictions imposed by the FMI standard [1]. Secondly, it can be used to construct a concrete model of a given co-simulation, based on the relational (or, for deterministic FMUs functional) description of FMU behaviour. Such a concrete model allows us to prove properties of the particular interactions that can be observed, using the FMI API. Most interestingly, this may use the fmi2Get function to probe outputs during co-simulation step. As already mentioned, our FMI Circus model complements the relational FMI model in INTO-CPS Deliverable D2.3a. Whereas the relational FMI model is most useful for proving universal and safety properties of co-simu- lations, the reactive model facilitates the design of master algorithms (which are only implicit in the relational model). It thus subsumes the relational model, and, as explained in the previous section, we can construct specific FMUs as Circus processes from their relational characterisations. In the next section, we report on our mechanisation of the Circus FMI model in the theorem prover Isabelle/UTP.
