Forfeiture of Security. The Security that the Transmission Developer provides the Connecting Transmission Owner in accordance with Article 11.4 of this Agreement shall be irrevocable and shall be subject to forfeiture in the event that the Transmission Developer subsequently terminates or abandons development of the Transmission Project. Any Security provided by the Transmission Developer to the Connecting Transmission Owner shall be subject to forfeiture to the extent necessary to defray the cost of: (1) Network Upgrade Facilities required for other Transmission Developers whose Transmission Project interconnection studies included the Transmission Developer’s Transmission Project and Network Upgrade Facilities in their base cases; and (2) System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrade Facilities required for projects for which the Transmission Project and Network Upgrade Facilities were included in their Annual Transmission Reliability Assessment and/or Class Year Deliverability Study, as applicable. If Transmission Developer’s Security is subject to forfeiture to defray the costs of an affected upgrade pursuant to this Article 11.5 and the Security is not in a form that can be readily drawn on by the Connecting Transmission Owner to defray the costs of the affected upgrade, Transmission Developer shall negotiate in good faith with the Connecting Transmission Owner to replace the Security with cash or an alternative form of Security that can be readily drawn on by Connecting Transmission Owner up to the amount required to satisfy Transmission Developer’s Security obligations under this Agreement, including defraying the costs of the affected upgrade. Connecting Transmission Owner shall only be responsible for using Transmission Developer’s Security to defray the costs of an affected upgrade to the extent Transmission Developer has provided cash or Security in a form that the Connecting Transmission Owner can readily draw on to defray such costs.
Forfeiture of Security. The Security the Transmission Developer provides Affected System Operator in accordance with Article 6.2 of this Agreement shall be irrevocable and shall be subject to forfeiture in the event that the Transmission Developer subsequently terminates or abandons development of the Affected System Upgrade Facilities. Any Security provided by the Transmission Developer shall be subject to forfeiture to the extent necessary to defray the cost of: (1) Network Upgrade Facilities required for other Transmission Developers whose Transmission Project interconnection studies included the Transmission Developer’s Transmission Project and Network Upgrade Facilities in their base cases; and (2) System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrade Facilities required for projects for which the Transmission Project and Network Upgrade Facilities were included in their Annual Transmission Reliability Assessment and/or Class Year Deliverability Study, as applicable.
Forfeiture of Security. Forfeiture of Proposal Security in accordance with Section 4.8 of the ITP will constitute liquidated damages. By submitting its Proposal, Proposer agrees and acknowledges that such liquidated damages are reasonable in order to compensate TxDOT for damages it will incur as a result of Proposer’s failure to satisfy the obligations under the RFP to which Proposer agreed when submitting its Proposal. Such damages include potential harm to the credibility and reputation of TxDOT’s transportation improvement program, including the CDA program, with policy makers and with the general public, delays to the Project and additional costs of administering this or a new procurement (including engineering, legal, accounting, overhead and other administrative costs). By submitting its Proposal, Proposer further acknowledges that these damages would be difficult and impracticable to measure and prove, are incapable of accurate measurement because of, among other things, the unique nature of the Project and the efforts required to receive and evaluate proposals for it, and the unavailability of a substitute for those efforts. The amounts of liquidated damages stated herein represent good faith estimates and evaluations as to the actual potential damages that TxDOT would incur as a result of Proposer’s failure to satisfy the obligations under the RFP to which Proposer agreed when submitting its Proposal, and do not constitute a penalty. By submitting its Proposal, Proposer agrees to such liquidated damages in order to fix and limit Proposer’s costs and to avoid later Disputes over what amounts of damages are properly chargeable to Proposer.
Forfeiture of Security. The Security that the Transmission Developer provides the Connecting Transmission Owner in accordance with Article 11.4 of this Agreement shall be irrevocable and shall be subject to forfeiture in the event that the Transmission Developer subsequently terminates or abandons development of the Transmission Project. Any Security provided by the Transmission Developer to the Connecting Transmission Owner shall be subject to forfeiture to the extent necessary to defray the cost of: (1) Network Upgrade Facilities required for other Transmission Developers whose Transmission Project interconnection studies included the Transmission Developer’s Transmission Project and Network Upgrade Facilities in their base cases; and (2)
Forfeiture of Security. With the exception of the requirement that cash and Security shall be surrendered back to the issuing Developer in connection with another Developer’s Security Posting Default, once a Developer has accepted the Project Cost Allocation(s) or Revised Project Cost Allocation(s) appropriate for its Interconnection Service election, as the case may be, and paid cash and posted Security or posted Security for that amount, such cash payment and Security shall be irrevocable and shall be subject to forfeiture as provided herein in the event that the Developer that paid cash and posted Security or posted the Security subsequently terminates or abandons development of its Project. Any cash and Security previously posted on a terminated Project will be subject to forfeiture to the extent necessary to defray the cost of the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades required for the Projects included in the Annual Transmission Reliability Assessment, Class Year Deliverability Study, or Additional SDU Study, as applicable, but only as described below. Security for System Upgrade Facilities constructed by the Developer (i.e., for which the Developer elects the option to build), shall be reduced after discrete portions of the System Upgrade Facilities have been completed, such reductions to be based on cost estimates from the Class Year Study, subject to review by the Connecting Transmission Owner or Affected Transmission Owner with which Security is posted, and subject to transfer of ownership to the Connecting Transmission Owner or Affected Transmission Owner, as applicable of all subject property, free and clear of any liens, as well as transfer of title and any transferable equipment warranties reasonably acceptable to the Connecting Transmission Owner or Affected Transmission Owner with which Security is posted. For System Upgrade Facilities constructed by the Connecting Transmission Owner or Affected Transmission Owner, Security shall be reduced after discrete portions of the System Upgrade Facilities have been completed by the Transmission Owner and paid for by the Developer, on a dollar-for-dollar basis for payments made to the Connecting Transmission Owner or Affected Transmission Owner pursuant to an E&P Agreement or Interconnection Agreement, subject to the Connecting Transmission Owner’s or Affected Transmission Owner’s review and approval.
Forfeiture of Security. The Security that the Transmission Developer provides the Connecting Transmission Owner in accordance with Article 11.4 of this Agreement shall be irrevocable and shall be subject to forfeiture in the event that the Transmission Developer subsequently terminates or abandons development of the Transmission Project. Any Security provided by the Transmission Developer to the Connecting Transmission Owner shall be subject to forfeiture to the extent necessary to defray the cost of: (1) Network Upgrade Facilities required for other Transmission Developers whose Transmission Project interconnection studies included the Transmission Developer’s Transmission Project and Network Upgrade Facilities in their base cases; and (2) System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrade Facilities required for projects for which the Transmission Project and Network Upgrade Facilities were included in their Annual Transmission Reliability Assessment and/or Class Year Deliverability Study, as applicable. If Transmission Developer’s Security is subject to forfeiture to defray the costs of an affected upgrade pursuant to this Article 11.5 and the Security is not in a form that can be readily drawn
Forfeiture of Security. In case, the contractor fails to execute any provision(s) of the contract, the university shall forfeit the performance security deposits and retention money as referred to under clause 1 (a) and (b) respectively
2. Bid Prices (11.2 ITB)
a) for goods offered from within Pakistan; the price shall be quoted on FOR UAF basis. (FOR means the price of goods quoted by the bidder shall be inclusive of all costs, expenses, charges, duties and taxes etc. whatsoever incidental to their delivery, installation and commissioning as the case may be at UAF site).
3. Liquidated Damages (GCC Clause 23) GCC 23.1—Applicable rate: The liquidated damages, if imposed, will be recovered at the rate of upto0.67% of the value of goods supplied/installed/commission late per day or a part of a period exceeding the original delivery period, subject to the provision that the total liquidated damages thus imposed will not exceed 10% of the total value of the goods delivered/installed/commission late.
