Instruction of Reviewers Sample Clauses

Instruction of Reviewers. No later than April 30th of the Spring prior to the semester in which a candidate is reviewed for tenure or promotion, letters will be sent by the Academic Supervisor, Unit Manager or designee to each potential reviewer outlining a request for review of scholarship material. Guidelines for the submission shall be developed by each Unit, including criteria developed in the Unit. Each reviewer will be asked to submit a statement outlining his relationship with the candidate. The Unit Managers, in consultation with faculty will develop a profile of the University, describing teaching load, resources for the support of faculty scholarship, and any exceptional circumstances that may impact faculty productivity, positively or negatively. A paragraph will be developed specific for each Unit and will be included in the narrative. Also included in the correspondence is the entire scholarship section of the candidate’s file, including the candidate’s self-assessment of the scholarship. Reviewers will be asked to address: (i) quality of the scholarship/professional activities presented; (ii) relevance to the field; (iii) importance of the scholarship/professional activities to or impact of the scholarship/professional activities in the field. Letters should equate/compare the scholarship/professional activities to that of others in that field or sub field, within the context of the submitted University criteria. Reviewers will be asked to return the reviews to the Academic Supervisor by June 30th. Should a response not be received, the Academic Supervisor or designee is required to send a follow up letter of request to the reviewer, with a request for the review no later than July 30th. Additional reviewers will be sought utilizing the method of choosing reviewers described above, should there be an issue with receiving reviews. Should the process result in fewer than two external reviews, this will not reflect negatively on the tenure or promotion application review for the candidate. The internal review process will continue while further external reviews are sought. This information will be included in the file. External reviews will be part of the tenure and promotion portfolios and used as input in order to review the candidate’s scholarly, creative or artistic achievements and professional activities. A statement regarding the content of the external review should be included in the narrative of the review by the academic supervisor, unit manager, RPT and UPT. ...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Instruction of Reviewers

  • Selection of Representatives a) Each central party and the Crown shall select its own representatives to the Committee.

  • Duration of Review This Articulation Agreement shall be effective from the date of affixing signatures and is subject to annual review by all parties affixing signatures. Any changes must be written and reflected in a new agreement. If no changes are indicated by the annual review, continuance of this agreement will remain in effect until terminated. Either party may terminate this agreement immediately without cause on 90 days written notice. In the event this agreement is terminated, students who are impacted shall have the opportunity to obtain credit according to the terms herein. Morehead State University ( MSU ) Responsibilities MSU shall be responsible for: ● Ensuring all institutional policies apply to articulated credit courses. ● Ensuring articulated credit is properly documented on postsecondary transcript in accordance with this agreement. ● Providing KDE with current postsecondary primary point of contact information to be published for general inquiries related to this Articulation Agreement and notifying KDE when updates are applicable. Secondary School (K-12) Responsibilities Secondary School (K-12) shall be responsible for: ● Providing detailed information to students in writing (i.e., a syllabus) consistent with the public postsecondary institution policy, which shall include the nature of the course and the expectations and requirements that correspond to its official catalog description. Course requirement information must include course prerequisites, course content, grading policy, attendance requirements, course completion requirements, performance standards, information on adding and dropping courses and other related course information. ● Promoting articulated credit opportunities among qualified high school students, parents and high school faculty. ● Ensuring proper Technical Education Data System (TEDS) data entry is maintained to allow for student testing. ● Ensuring articulated credit documentation (e.g., high school transcript with state course codes identified, CTE EOP assessment certificate(s), industry certification certificate(s)) is provided to the student upon meeting requirements. This document was completed by: bdavis Digitally signed by bdavis Date: 2018.12.10 14:14:21 -05'00' Articulation Agreement Kentucky Department of Education And Xxxxxxxx State University In Reference to Production Crop Career and Technical Education End-of-Program Assessment Agreement Number: AG - 18-19 - 0008 Signature Page The Kentucky Department of Education (KDE) and Morehead State University ( MSU ) enter into this Articulation Agreement on this 10 day of December , 20 18 . This Articulation Agreement shall be effective from the date of affixing signatures and is subject to annual review by all parties affixing signatures. Any changes must be written and reflected in a new agreement. If no changes are indicated by the annual review, continuance of this agreement will remain in effect until terminated. Either party may terminate this agreement immediately for cause or may terminate without cause on 90 days written notice. In the event this agreement is terminated, students who are impacted shall have the opportunity to obtain credit according to the terms herein. In testimony thereof, witness the duly authorized signatures of the parties hereto: Kentucky Department of Education Xxxxx X. Xxxxx, Ph.D. Commissioner of Education Date Morehead State University signed by Xxx Xxxxxx 1/3/2019

  • Notification of Recall Notification of recall from layoff shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, deliverable to addressee only, to the employee's last known address. The notice shall give the employee a minimum of ten (10) calendar days within which to respond after the notice of recall has been mailed. Employees who decline recall or who, in the absence of extenuating circumstances, fail to respond within the time set for return to work, shall be presumed to have resigned and their name shall be removed from the seniority and preferred eligibility list.

  • REQUEST FOR REVIEW Within sixty (60) days after receiving notice from the Plan Administrator that a claim has been denied (in part or all of the claim), then claimant (or their duly authorized representative) may file with the Plan Administrator, a written request for a review of the denial of the claim. The claimant (or his duly authorized representative) shall then have the opportunity to submit written comments, documents, records and other information relating to the claim. The Plan Administrator shall also provide the claimant, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant (as defined in applicable ERISA regulations) to the claimant’s claim for benefits.

  • Designation of Representative The Director of Public Works or the Director’s authorized representative is hereby designated as the City’s representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Agreement. Said representative shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, and interpret and define the City’s policies and decisions with respect to the services of the Consultant.

  • Using Agency’s Representative The Using Agency may designate from time to time a Using Agency’s Representative, who shall work with the Design Professional and the Owner’s Representative as a liaison with the Using Agency.

  • Review Procedures The Parties agree to jointly conduct a review, sampling transactions of the incidents managed under this Agreement. Findings that are inconsistent with the normal or accepted way of doing business will be reconciled on a case by case basis. Any decision to further examine records will be considered on a case by case basis and appropriate follow up action agreed upon by all agencies involved. Payment for Protection Services (use if appropriate) Geographic, Statewide or Sub-Geographic (local) operating plans and procurement documents or agreement will establish billing procedures for Fee Basis Protection Services.

  • Designation of Representatives The District’s Representative is: Name and Contact Information The Contractor’s Representative is: Name and Contact Information A party may change its designated representative upon 30 days written notice to the other party.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Appointment Procedures 20.06.01 When a vacancy occurs, the University Librarian will send written notification to all Librarians stating the plans for replacement and the disposition of duties within one month after such Librarian position becomes vacant. The University Librarian shall provide a monthly update to Librarian members on the progress of his/her plans for replacement and disposition of duties.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.