Major Cases Sample Clauses

Major Cases. 11.16 Any discharge imposed among other things for breach of trust, dishonesty, theft, sleeping, drunkenness, drinking intoxicants while on duty or on TTC property, being in possession of an intoxi- cating beverage or drug, for other than medicinal purposes, while on duty, for working under the influence of liquor or drugs, or convic- tion of a criminal offense, if proved to the satisfaction of representa- tives of the Union and the TTC shall not be subject to appeal beyond Step 2 of the grievance procedure.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Major Cases. Any discharge imposed among other things for drunkenness, drink- ing intoxicants while on duty or on Commission property, for work- ing under the influence of liquor or drugs, the commission of graffiti or scratchiti or a violation of human rights if proved to the satisfac- tion of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall not be subject to appeal beyond Step 4 of the Grievance Procedure. Any discharge imposed among other things for breach of trust, dis- honesty, theft, sleeping on duty or conviction of a criminal offense, causing an accident through carelessness or violation of safety rules and procedures if proved to the satisfaction of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall be subject to appeal as outlined in the Grievance Procedure.
Sample 1Sample 2
Major Cases. There is no case where Japan was urged to amend specific laws and regulations or notifications due to EPA obligation provisions regarding intellectual property. This means that, from Japan’s perspective, the intellectual property provisions of EPAs function to strengthen the intellectual property systems of counterparty countries. In addition, the dispute settlement procedures under EPAs for the rights and obligations relating to intellectual property may serve as based upon which to inquire about the implementation of obligations of the counterparty country. It is believed that when the number of specific cases rises, the practicality of the foregoing could be further ascertained. Column ♦ International Treaties related to Intellectual Property Right World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) WIPO is a specialized agency of the United Nations related to intellectual property rights (such as patent rights, trademark rights, and copyrights). WIPO internationally promotes intellectual property protection by i) developing treaties which aim to harmonize the systems of the WIPO member states, ii) raising protection levels in developing countries through technology cooperation, and iii) promoting information sharing. XXXX also administers and operates treaties and international registration systems regarding intellectual property rights. WIPO’s headquarters are in Geneva, and has 184 member states (as of December 2006). The treaties administered by WIPO include those listed below, and there exist FTAs/EPAs which provide the requirement to accede to such treaties. (See the agreements mentioned in the Reference.)
Sample 1
Major Cases. 785 There is few cases in which Japan has been urged to amend specific laws and regulations or notifications due to EPA obligation provisions regarding intellectual property. This means that, from Japan’s perspective, the intellectual property rights provisions of EPAs function to strengthen the intellectual property systems of counterparty countries. In addition, the dispute settlement procedures under EPAs for the rights and obligations relating to intellectual property may serve as a basis upon which to inquire about the implementation of obligations of the counterparty country. It is believed that when the number of specific cases rises, the practicality of the foregoing could be further ascertained. Part III: FTA/EPA and IIA COLUMN INTERNATIONAL TREATIES RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (WIPO) WIPO is a specialized agency of the United Nations dealing with intellectual property rights (i.e., patent rights, industrial design rights, trademark rights, and copyrights). WIPO internationally promotes intellectual property protection by: i) developing treaties which aim to harmonize the systems of the WIPO member states; ii) raising protection levels in developing countries through technology cooperation; and iii) promoting information sharing. XXXX also administers and operates treaties and international registration systems regarding intellectual property rights. WIPO’s headquarters are in Geneva, and it currently has 189 member states (as of February 2017). The treaties administered by WIPO include those listed below; there are EPAs/FTAs which provide the requirement to accede to such treaties. (See the Agreements mentioned in the Reference.)
Sample 1
Major Cases. Any discharge imposed among other things for drunkenness, drinking intoxicants while on duty or on Commission property, for working under the influence of liquor or drugs if proved to the satisfaction of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall not be subject to appeal beyond Step of the Grievance Procedure. Any discharge imposed among other things for breach of trust, dishonesty, theft, sleeping on duty or conviction of a criminal offense, causing an accident through carelessness or violation of safety rules and procedures if proved to the satisfaction of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall be subject to appeal as outlined in the Grievance Procedure.
Sample 1
Major Cases. There is no case where Japan has been urged to amend specific laws and regulations or notifications due to EPA obligation provisions regarding intellectual property. This means that, from Japan’s perspective, the intellectual property rights provisions of EPAs function to strengthen the intellectual property systems of counterparty countries. In addition, the dispute settlement procedures under EPAs for the rights and obligations relating to intellectual property may serve as a basis upon which to inquire about the implementation of obligations of the counterparty country. It is believed that when the number of specific cases rises, the practicality of the foregoing could be further ascertained.
Sample 1
Major Cases. A case is classified as 'major' if, for example, the customer experiences suddenly occurred situations resulting in most of the enterprise’s devices not being able to use the IoT Connectivity service. The following examples of major cases can be listed: • Crash that blocks access to computer connection, SMS messaging and voice. • No access to the self-service platform, including no access via API • Transmission crash for customers with the supplementary product Private APN that results in no access to data, SMS messaging and voice (for example fault in or fault connected with the customer’s MPLS connection connected to the IoT Connectivity service.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Major Cases. It is pertinent to point out that the most emblematic cases in 2016 were marked by two rulings that defined the orientation of the peace process in Colombia. That is why it is pertinent to mention the Sentence C-376 dated 2016 that reviewed the viability of the special plebiscite (A), and the Sentence C-699 dated 2016 reviewing two articles of the challenged Legislative Act 1 dated 2016, which authorized the Fast track (B) implementation of the Final Agreement.
Sample 1
Major Cases. 8.1 The OPP Criminal Investigation Branches primary function is to provide case management and expert investigative assistance on serious criminal matters. Expertise in extradition matters is also provided.
Sample 1

Related to Major Cases

  • Court Cases Any employee who is duly subpoenaed as a witness in any case in court shall be entitled to leave with pay for that purpose provided that the employee is not a party in the case, and provided that the case is not the result of litigation undertaken by the employee or the Union against the District. In cases where the Board is a party in the litigation, the employee shall be entitled to pay while attending as a witness at the request of the Board or as a co-defendant in the case.

  • Bidding and Proposal Phase 1.5.1 In conjunction with the development of the Guaranteed Maximum Price and at other times as appropriate to the Project, the Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner and Construction Manager by receiving and recording requests for Bid and Request for Proposal (“RFP”) Documents, receiving and resolving questions about Bid and RFP Documents; preparing addenda, issuing addenda, and accounting for addenda issued; attending pre-bid and pre-proposal conferences and HUB meetings; evaluating bids and proposals; and assisting in preparing and awarding multiple contracts for construction. Architect/Engineer shall answer inquiries from bidders and proposers at Owner’s request, and shall prepare and issue any necessary addenda to the bidding or proposal documents.

  • Use Cases Subscription Services are provided for Software only when used for its supported purpose (“Use Case”). The Use Case determines which Subscription is required and what fees are charged. If you use or deploy the Software in a manner contrary to a supported Use Case, you are responsible for purchasing the appropriate Subscription(s) to cover such usage. For example, if you are using a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Subscription as a server, you are obligated to purchase a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Subscription.

  • Special Cases Value-Based Programs- BlueCard Program BCBSRI has included a factor for bulk distributions from Host Blues in GROUP’s monthly premium for Value- Based Programs when applicable under this Agreement. Additional information is available upon request. If BCBSRI has entered into a Negotiated Arrangement with a Host Blue to provide Value-Based Programs to Group’s Enrolled Members, BCBSRI will follow the same procedures for Value-Based Programs as noted above for the BlueCard Program.

  • Project Approval The County may issue a Job Order Authorization for the Work, to include the firm-fixed-price of the Job Order and the project duration. Contractor agrees that all clauses of this Contract are applicable to any Job Order issued hereunder. The County reserves the right to reject a Contractor’s Quote based on unjustifiable quantities and/or methods, performance periods, inadequate documentation, or other inconsistencies or deficiencies on the Contractor’s part in the sole opinion of the County. The County reserves the right to issue a unilateral Job Order authorization for the Work if a Quote price cannot be mutually agreed upon. This is based upon unjustifiable quantities in the sole opinion of the County. The County also reserves the right to not issue a Job Order Authorization if the County’s requirement is no longer valid or the project is not funded. In these instances, the Contractor has no right of claim to recover Quote expenses. The County may pursue continuing valid requirements by other means where Contract was not reached with the Contractor.

  • Final Approval Hearing “Final Approval Hearing” shall mean the hearing at which the Court will consider and finally decide whether to enter the Final Judgment.

  • Project Approach € Project schedules and budgets are reviewed by the Project Manager on a weekly basis during our company-wide Project Managers Meeting using project status reports generated by our control software (Deltek Vision). Progress is compared to the schedule and budget to ensure adequate resources are available and that necessary coordination is occurring. Costs are reported real time, with actual labor based on time sheet entry and actual expense costs based on invoices. The reporting system can be customized to track specific tasks or efforts in multiple categories, making it flexible enough to adapt to any project specific requirements. We hold regular project coordination meetings to facilitate communication and information transfer among the design team. These meetings are held weekly and are supplemented with e-mail communication, as well as telephone conversations. We hold monthly project status meetings with your project manager to update project status, discuss priorities, and receive direction from City staff. This provides an opportunity for communication and information to flow openly between the City and the design team. These meetings are supplemented by communications that will occur via e-mail and telephone. We conduct meetings with other agencies and stakeholders impacted by the work as needed. E-mail and telephone communication work well for quick questions or minor issues, but we have found that the most effective means of communication with other agencies and stakeholders is the “old-fashioned” face- to-face mexxxxx. Xxbble’s record of providing quality civil engineering services to our clients reflects our ability to manage multiple projects effectively and efficiently. Our philosophy is that each project is personally overseen by one of our principal officers, thereby providing immediate attention to all project aspects (i.e. negotiations, communications, schedule, budgets).

  • New Project Approval Consultant and District recognize that Consultant’s Services may include working on various projects for District. Consultant shall obtain the approval of District prior to the commencement of a new project.

  • Final Approval Order 62. The Parties shall jointly seek entry of a Final Approval Order, the text of which the Parties shall agree upon. The dismissal orders, motions or stipulation to implement this Section shall, among other things, seek or provide for a dismissal with prejudice and waiving any rights of appeal.

  • Impasse 5.1 If negotiations are not successfully concluded by the first day of school, an impasse shall exist. At any earlier time following the initial negotiation session, either party may declare an impasse, or, by mutual agreement of the parties, the date for declaring impasse may be extended beyond the first day of school.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.