Major Cases Sample Clauses

Major Cases. Any discharge imposed among other things for breach of trust, dishonesty, theft, sleeping, drunkenness, drinking intoxicants while on duty or on TTC property, being in possession of an intoxi- cating beverage or drug, for other than medicinal purposes, while on duty, for working under the influence of liquor or drugs, or convic- tion of a criminal offense, if proved to the satisfaction of representa- tives of the Union and the TTC shall not be subject to appeal beyond Step 2 of the grievance procedure.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Major Cases. Any discharge imposed among other things for drunkenness, drink- ing intoxicants while on duty or on Commission property, for work- ing under the influence of liquor or drugs, the commission of graffiti or scratchiti or a violation of human rights if proved to the satisfac- tion of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall not be subject to appeal beyond Step 4 of the Grievance Procedure. Any discharge imposed among other things for breach of trust, dis- honesty, theft, sleeping on duty or conviction of a criminal offense, causing an accident through carelessness or violation of safety rules and procedures if proved to the satisfaction of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall be subject to appeal as outlined in the Grievance Procedure.
Sample 1Sample 2
Major Cases. 904 There is no case where Japan has been urged to amend specific laws and regulations or notifications due to EPA obligation provisions regarding intellectual property. This means that, from Japan’s perspective, the intellectual property rights provisions of EPAs function to strengthen the intellectual property systems of counterparty countries. In addition, the dispute settlement procedures under EPAs for the rights and obligations relating to intellectual property may serve as a basis upon which to inquire about the implementation of obligations of the counterparty country. It is believed that when the number of specific cases rises, the practicality of the foregoing could be further ascertained. WIPO is a specialized agency of the United Nations dealing with intellectual property rights ( i.e., patent rights, industrial design rights, trademark rights, and copyrights). WIPO internationally promotes intellectual property protection by: i) developing treaties which aim to harmonize the systems of the WIPO member states; ii) raising protection levels in developing countries through technology cooperation; and iii) promoting information sharing. XXXX also administers and operates treaties and international registration systems regarding intellectual property rights. WIPO’s headquarters are in Geneva, and it currently has 188 member states (as of January 2016). The treaties administered by WIPO include those listed below; there are EPAs/FTAs which provide the requirement to accede to such treaties. (See the Agreements mentioned in the Reference.)
Sample 1
Major Cases. A case is classified as 'major' if, for example, the customer experiences suddenly occurred situations resulting in most of the enterprise’s devices not being able to use the IoT Connectivity service. The following examples of major cases can be listed: • Crash that blocks access to computer connection, SMS messaging and voice. • No access to the self-service platform, including no access via API • Transmission crash for customers with the supplementary product Private APN that results in no access to data, SMS messaging and voice (for example fault in or fault connected with the customer’s MPLS connection connected to the IoT Connectivity service. 4. Fault correction time, repair time and support time
Sample 1
Major Cases. There is no case where Japan has been urged to amend specific laws and regulations or notifications due to EPA obligation provisions regarding intellectual property. This means that, from Japan’s perspective, the intellectual property rights provisions of EPAs function to strengthen the intellectual property systems of counterparty countries. In addition, the dispute settlement procedures under EPAs for the rights and obligations relating to intellectual property may serve as a basis upon which to inquire about the implementation of obligations of the counterparty country. It is believed that when the number of specific cases rises, the practicality of the foregoing could be further ascertained.
Sample 1
Major Cases. Any discharge imposed among other things for drunkenness, drinking intoxicants while on duty or on Commission property, for working under the influence of liquor or drugs if proved to the satisfaction of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall not be subject to appeal beyond Step of the Grievance Procedure. Any discharge imposed among other things for breach of trust, dishonesty, theft, sleeping on duty or conviction of a criminal offense, causing an accident through carelessness or violation of safety rules and procedures if proved to the satisfaction of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall be subject to appeal as outlined in the Grievance Procedure.
Sample 1
Major Cases. 8.1 The OPP Criminal Investigation Branches primary function is to provide case management and expert investigative assistance on serious criminal matters. Expertise in extradition matters is also provided. 8.2 The Senior Officer of NAPS may request the services of Criminal Investigation Branch and once the assistance has been authorized, the Branch shall assume and maintain case management until the conclusion of the investigation. 8.3 The OPP member assigned to the investigation shall liaise with the Senior Officer of NAPS to determine shared resources.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Major Cases. It is pertinent to point out that the most emblematic cases in 2016 were marked by two rulings that defined the orientation of the peace process in Colombia. That is why it is pertinent to mention the Sentence C-376 dated 2016 that reviewed the viability of the special plebiscite (A), and the Sentence C-699 dated 2016 reviewing two articles of the challenged Legislative Act 1 dated 2016, which authorized the Fast track (B) implementation of the Final Agreement.
Sample 1
Major Cases. 785 There is few cases in which Japan has been urged to amend specific laws and regulations or notifications due to EPA obligation provisions regarding intellectual property. This means that, from Japan’s perspective, the intellectual property rights provisions of EPAs function to strengthen the intellectual property systems of counterparty countries. In addition, the dispute settlement procedures under EPAs for the rights and obligations relating to intellectual property may serve as a basis upon which to inquire about the implementation of obligations of the counterparty country. It is believed that when the number of specific cases rises, the practicality of the foregoing could be further ascertained. Part III: FTA/EPA and IIA COLUMN INTERNATIONAL TREATIES RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (WIPO) WIPO is a specialized agency of the United Nations dealing with intellectual property rights (i.e., patent rights, industrial design rights, trademark rights, and copyrights). WIPO internationally promotes intellectual property protection by: i) developing treaties which aim to harmonize the systems of the WIPO member states; ii) raising protection levels in developing countries through technology cooperation; and iii) promoting information sharing. XXXX also administers and operates treaties and international registration systems regarding intellectual property rights. WIPO’s headquarters are in Geneva, and it currently has 189 member states (as of February 2017). The treaties administered by WIPO include those listed below; there are EPAs/FTAs which provide the requirement to accede to such treaties. (See the Agreements mentioned in the Reference.)
Sample 1

Related to Major Cases

  • Project Approval The County may issue a Job Order Authorization for the Work, to include the firm-fixed-price of the Job Order and the project duration. Contractor agrees that all clauses of this Contract are applicable to any Job Order issued hereunder. The County reserves the right to reject a Contractor’s Quote based on unjustifiable quantities and/or methods, performance periods, inadequate documentation, or other inconsistencies or deficiencies on the Contractor’s part in the sole opinion of the County. The County reserves the right to issue a unilateral Job Order authorization for the Work if a Quote price cannot be mutually agreed upon. This is based upon unjustifiable quantities in the sole opinion of the County. The County also reserves the right to not issue a Job Order Authorization if the County’s requirement is no longer valid or the project is not funded. In these instances, the Contractor has no right of claim to recover Quote expenses. The County may pursue continuing valid requirements by other means where Contract was not reached with the Contractor.

  • Final Approval Hearing “Final Approval Hearing” shall mean the hearing at which the Court will consider and finally decide whether to enter the Final Judgment.

  • New Project Approval Consultant and District recognize that Consultant’s Services may include working on various projects for District. Consultant shall obtain the approval of District prior to the commencement of a new project.

  • Major Change For a major change referred to in paragraph (1)(a):

  • Major Workplace Change 11.1 If the Employer has made a decision to introduce a major workplace change that is likely to have a Significant Effect on a number of Employees, the Employer must notify the Employee(s) who will be affected by the decision .As soon as practicable and prior to implementation, the Employer must discuss with the relevant Employees and/or their nominated representative/s (e.g. Union or other representative) the introduction of the change; and the effect the change is likely to have on the Employees. The Employer must discuss measures to avert or mitigate the adverse effect of the change on the Employees. 11.2 For the purposes of the discussion the Employer will provide the relevant Employees and/or their nominated representative/s in writing: (a) All relevant information about the change including the nature of the change proposed; (b) Information about the expected effects of the change on the Employees; and (c) Any other matters likely to affect the Employees. However, the Employer is not required to disclose confidential or commercially sensitive information. The Employer must give prompt and genuine consideration to matters raised about the major change by the relevant Employees.

  • Impasse 5.1 If negotiations are not successfully concluded by the first day of school, an impasse shall exist. At any earlier time following the initial negotiation session, either party may declare an impasse, or, by mutual agreement of the parties, the date for declaring impasse may be extended beyond the first day of school. 5.2 Within three (3) days of such declaration, the parties may, by mutual agreement, request the services of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. 5.3 If the mediation process has been utilized and has failed to bring about agreement on all items, or if the mediation process was not utilized, the unresolved items shall be submitted to fact finding as follows: 5.3.1 A fact-finding committee consisting of three (3) members shall be formed. One (1) member shall be selected by USPA and one (1) member shall be selected by the Board within five (5) days. The third member shall be selected by the first two (2) members within fifteen (15) days as follows: The parties shall notify the State Superintendent of Public Instruction that a fact finder is needed and request a list of five (5) potential fact finders. If no name is agreeable to both parties, a coin toss shall occur with the party winning the toss having the right to strike a name from the list. The parties will then continue alternately striking names off the list until only one (1) name remains. The remaining name shall be considered as the parties' selection as the third member and shall be the chairperson of the fact-finding committee. 5.3.2 The committee shall meet with the Board's designated representatives and with USPA's designated representatives for the purpose of fact finding. 5.3.3 Within five (5) days after the selection of a chairperson, the representatives of the parties shall meet to exchange written language on each item at impasse. The exchanged documents shall be furnished to the chairperson and other members of the committee. Each item being submitted to fact finding shall show the last position taken by each negotiating team. 5.3.4 The cost for the services of the fact-finding committee including per diem expenses, if any, and actual and necessary travel expenses shall be shared in the following manner: The Board shall assume the expenses of the representative selected by the Board, USPA shall assume the expenses of the representative selected by their organization, and the expenses of the third member shall be shared equally by the Board and USPA. 5.3.5 The fact-finding committee shall have authority to establish procedural rules, conduct investigations, and hold hearings during which each party shall be given an opportunity to present its case with supporting evidence. 5.3.6 All hearings by the fact-finding committee shall be conducted in closed session. 5.3.7 The chairperson shall convene the committee for fact finding. The committee shall meet with the representative of both parties and, within twenty (20) days after the fact-finding hearing, shall present its written recommendation to the Board and USPA. The report shall set forth findings of fact and recommendations on the issues submitted. 5.3.8 If either party decides it must reject one or more of the committee's recommendations, said party must, within seven (7) days after the committee has presented its recommendations, request a meeting of the representatives who have been negotiating for the Board and USPA. The parties shall meet within seven (7) days of the request, unless both parties deem it unnecessary. At such meeting, the parties shall exchange written statements expressing each party's rationale for rejecting each recommendation found unacceptable and shall attempt to clarify any remaining differences. The representatives shall then resume a good faith effort to resolve differences; provided, after fourteen (14) days after the exchange of written statements, as provided for by this section, either party may discontinue such effort.

  • Recurring Transactions If you intend to use the Card for recurring transactions, you should monitor your balance and ensure you have funds available in your Card Account to cover the transactions. “Recurring Transactions” are transactions that are authorized in advance by you to be charged to your Card at substantially regular intervals. If these Recurring Transactions may vary in amount, the person you are going to pay should tell you, 10 days before each payment, when it will be made and how much it will be. (You may choose instead to get this notice only when the payment would differ by more than a certain amount from the previous payment, or when the amount would fall outside certain limits that you set.) If you have told us in advance to make Recurring Transactions from your Card Account, you can stop the payment by calling us at 0-000-000-0000 or writing us at 0000 X. Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxx# 000, Xxxxx Xxxxxx, XX 00000xx time for us to receive your request at least three (3) business days before the scheduled date of the payment. If you call, we also may require you to put your request in writing and get it to us within fourteen (14) days after you call. If you order us to stop one of these payments three (3) business days or more before the transfer is scheduled, and we do not do so, we may be liable for your losses or damages. If you have authorized a merchant to make the recurring payment, you should also contact the applicable merchant in order to stop the transaction.

  • Construction Period During the construction period, Redeveloper agrees to keep the construction area, including completed operations insured against loss or damage by fire, and such other risks, casualties, and hazards as are customarily covered by builders’ risk or extended coverage policies in an amount not less than the replacement value but allowing for reasonable coinsurance clauses and deductibles. In the event of any insured damage or destruction, Redeveloper agrees to use its good faith efforts to commence restoration of the Private Improvements to its prior condition within nine (9) months from the date of the damage or destruction, and shall diligently pursue the same to completion.

  • Formal Stage Step 1 a) Where OSSTF decides to proceed with a grievance, it shall commit the grievance to writing, setting out the facts of the grievance together with the provisions of the Agreement claimed to have been violated and indicating the relief sought and shall deliver the same to the Principal or Supervisor within twenty (20) days from the time of the occurrence of the circumstances giving rise to the grievance or when the employee ought reasonably to have become aware of the circumstances giving rise to the grievance under this Collective Agreement. b) The Principal or immediate supervisor or designate, shall meet with the grievor(s) and the designate OSSTF representative(s) within ten (10) days from the receipt of the grievance. The Principal or immediate supervisor or designate shall forward the written decision to OSSTF within five (5) days of such meeting. a) Failing settlement at Step 1, OSSTF may submit the grievance, in writing, to the Director or designate within five (5) days of receiving the decision at Step 1. b) The Director or designate shall meet with the designated OSSTF representative(s) within ten (10) days from the receipt of the grievance. The grievor(s) may attend such meeting at the request of the OSSTF representative(s). The Director or designate shall forward a written decision to OSSTF within five (5) days of such meeting. If no settlement is reached, OSSTF may submit the grievance to arbitration within twenty (20) days of receipt of the response as follows:

  • Dispositive Motions Each party shall have the right to submit dispositive motions pursuant Rule 12 or Rule 56 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure (a “Dispositive Motion”). The party submitting the Dispositive Motion may, but is not required to, deliver to the arbitrator and to the other party a memorandum in support (the “Memorandum in Support”) of the Dispositive Motion. Within seven (7) calendar days of delivery of the Memorandum in Support, the other party shall deliver to the arbitrator and to the other party a memorandum in opposition to the Memorandum in Support (the “Memorandum in Opposition”). Within seven (7) calendar days of delivery of the Memorandum in Opposition, as applicable, the party that submitted the Memorandum in Support shall deliver to the arbitrator and to the other party a reply memorandum to the Memorandum in Opposition (“Reply Memorandum”). If the applicable party shall fail to deliver the Memorandum in Opposition as required above, or if the other party fails to deliver the Reply Memorandum as required above, then the applicable party shall lose its right to so deliver the same, and the Dispositive Motion shall proceed regardless.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!