We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Mid-Year Check Sample Clauses

Mid-Year Check. The evaluator shall meet with the teacher for a mid-year check-in no later than the end of February, for the purposes that includes, but is not limited to: 1. To discuss the teacher’s progress toward goals set in the Fall; 2. To discuss the teacher’s progress toward establishing student growth goals and evidence of student progress toward meeting those goals; 3. To discuss areas of strength and areas of growth for the teacher; 4. To develop plans for observations the remainder of the year. 5. By June 1, the teacher will sign two (2) copies of the Final Summative Evaluation Report. The signature of the teacher does not imply that the employee agrees with its contents.
Mid-Year CheckThe employee and evaluator shall hold a mid-year check to discuss the following: the teacher’s self-rating on all evaluated criteria and components, the administrator’s preliminary rating on all evaluated criteria and components, submission of any additional evidence the teacher would like the evaluator to consider, student growth goals, data, and progress toward meeting those goals.
Mid-Year Check. The employee and the Evaluator shall hold a mid-year check to discuss the
Mid-Year Check a. The employee and the Evaluator shall hold a mid-year check to discuss the following: ● The Teacher’s self-rating on all evaluated criteria and components; ● The administrator’s preliminary rating on all evaluated criteria and components; ● Submission of any additional evidence the Teacher would like the Principal to consider; ● Student growth goals, data, and progress towards meeting those goals. b. After the mid-year check rating conference, the Evaluator may request additional observation or artifacts in order to obtain clear and convincing evidence in support of an eventual summative evaluation. c. If an Evaluator’s Mid-year rating for a Teacher is Proficient or Distinguished, the eventual summative rating cannot be Basic or Unsatisfactory unless the administrator provides multiple artifacts and evidence to indicate a deficiency in practice occurring after the midyear formative assessment. d. If an Evaluator’s Mid-year rating for a Teacher is Unsatisfactory or Basic, the administrator and Teacher shall agree upon means for demonstrating improvement through artifacts or observation. e. The Mid-year rating is a formative rating and shall not be used in any mathematical formula for the eventual calculation of a summative rating.
Mid-Year CheckA teacher on a focused evaluation may request a mid-year conference.