Student Growth Measures. 1. The focused evaluation will include the student growth rubrics of the selected criterion. If criterions 3, 6, or 8 are selected, evaluators will use those student growth rubrics. If criterion 1, 2, 4, 5, or 7 is selected, evaluators will use criterion 3 and 6 student growth rubrics, as selected by the teacher.
Student Growth Measures. A student growth measure is a unit of academic growth projected for a student over a specified period of time which has been established according to a set of procedures defined either by the value-added data system, by the school district for approved vendor assessments, or locally developed student learning objectives (SLOs).
Student Growth Measures. 1. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as Student Growth 3.1, 3.2, 6.1, 6.2, and 8.1. For a comprehensive evaluation, evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average or high, based on the scores below: • 18-20 - High • 13-17 - Average • 5-12 - Low A student growth score of “1” in any of the rubric rows will result in an overall low student growth score.
Student Growth Measures. In determining student growth measures, the evaluator will use the Ohio Department of Education’s Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES), which calculates student growth by assessing achievement for an individual student occurring between two points in time. This is demonstrated, depending on the teaching assignment, through a combination of Value-Added reports, shared attribution, vendor assessments and/or SLOs as prescribed under state law.
Student Growth Measures. A. Student growth measures account for whatever portion of the teacher evaluation that is required by law. Student growth is defined as the change in student achievement for an individual student between two or more points in time.
Student Growth Measures. 1. Student Growth Measures shall be based on SLOs, approved vendor assessments or value-added data, whichever measure is required.
Student Growth Measures. At the beginning of the year, the teacher and evaluator shall discuss and agree upon student growth measures and student growth goals to be used for the year. Student growth data will be taken from multiple sources in the same school year, and must be appropriate and relevant to the teacher’s assignment. Student achievement data that does not measure growth between two points in time shall not be used to calculate a teacher’s student growth criterion score.
Student Growth Measures. 1. Student growth measures shall be used to support a member’s evaluation but shall constitute no more than fifty percent (50%) of the total evaluation rating/designation, unless otherwise altered by legislation and agreed to by the parties.
Student Growth Measures. 1. Category A1 teachers’ (i.e., those who teach only subjects measured by value-added calculations) evaluation will be comprised of the following: the entire student academic growth factor of the evaluation shall be based on the value-added progress dimension.
Student Growth Measures. Assessment of Student Growth Student growth measures (defined as the change in student achievement between two or more points in time account for fifty percent (50%) of the teacher evaluation. In calculating student academic growth for an evaluation, a student shall not be included if the student has 45 or more unexcused absences for the school year. The student growth component will be comprised of a combination of two or more measures of Value-Added scores, Vendor-created assessments, and or LEA determined student growth measures. TEACHER PLACEMENT FOR STUDENT GROWTH The various measures that may be included to account for the teacher’s Student Growth Measures are allocated as follows: PCLS Student Growth Measures (SGM) Allocations Educator Category Value-Added % Vendor Assessmen t % LEA Measures SLOs* % LEA Measures Shared Attribution % Total = 50% A1: Value-Added 50 N/A 0 0 50 A2: Value-Added Schedule <30% VA VA = 10 Schedule 30-69% VA VA = 15 Schedule > 69% VA = 20 N/A 30-40 (Proportiona l to schedule See Value- Added Column) 0 50 B: ODE-Approved Vendor Assessment N/A 10 40 0 50 C: LEA Measures N/A N/A 50 0 50 NOTE1: All SLO and LEA Vendor Assessment scores must be weighted equally. Within the LEA Measures category, Shared Attribution can be weighted separately and not the same as the SLO’s. NOTE2: There can be no more than five unique LEA Vendor Assessments or SLO’s. NOTE3: Determinations of annual allocations will be made by the legislature and collectively bargained by the administration and member representative as permissible. EVALUATION PROCESS
