Summative Rating. A. The summative rating of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations.
Summative Rating. 1. The summative rating of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations.
Summative Rating. 1. Comprehensive Evaluation A classroom teacher on a comprehensive evaluation shall receive a summative performance rating for each of the eight (8) state evaluation criteria. The overall summative score is determined by totaling the eight (8) criterion-level scores as follows: 8-14—Unsatisfactory 15-21—Basic 22-28—Proficient 29-32—Distinguished
Summative Rating. The summative evaluation will incorporate a 4-rating system, “excellent,” “proficient,” “developing” or “unsatisfactory” based on a numerical scoring system. The summative rating score will include the score from both the competency-based rubric and a rubric for assessing goals. Each shall be weighted 50% for the overall summative evaluation rating.
Summative Rating. This overall evaluation score combines the multiple measures of teacher practice and student growth. All New Jersey teachers earn one of four ratings: Highly Effective, Effective, Partially Effective, or Ineffective.
Summative Rating. The summative rating of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures, which shall account for fifty percent (50%), and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, which shall account for fifty percent (50%).Evaluation Rating For the purposes of the evaluation framework developed under this Article, teacher performance shall be rated based upon the following specific standards and criteria as set forth by the Ohio Department of Education that distinguish between the following levels of performance for teachers: • Accomplished • Skilled • Developing • Ineffective Ratings of accomplished, skilled and developing will be considered comparable, provided that a teacher rated as developing has not been rated developing for more than 2 consecutive years. If a teacher has been rated developing for more than 2 consecutive years then they shall not be considered comparable to those with ratings of accomplished or skilled.
Summative Rating. The summative rating of a teacher shall be based upon student growth measures, which shall account for fifty percent (50%), and performance that is assessed through evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations, which shall account for fifty percent (50%).Evaluation Rating For the purposes of the evaluation framework developed under this Article, teacher performance shall be rated based upon the following specific standards and criteria as set forth by the Ohio Department of Education that distinguish between the following levels of performance for teachers: • Accomplished • Skilled • Developing • Ineffective
Summative Rating. Teacher Practice Component: The scoring of the teacher practice portion of the evaluation shall be in accordance with the Xxxxxx Public Schools' District Evaluation Instrument Domain/Component Weightiness spreadsheet included in the Districts' Evaluation Plan document. Growth Component: The Growth Component shall be calculated in accordance with each District's Evaluation Plan(s) document.
Summative Rating. 1. The summative rating of a teacher shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.
