NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions. Offeror shall identify the person responsible for providing the mandatory usage reports. This information must be kept current during the contract period. The Contractor will be required to provide reporting contact within fifteen (15) business days of Master Agreement execution.
NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions. The NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement uses the default order of precedence specified in section 1 to resolve conflicts between terms and conditions. Depending on the solicitation design, the order of precedence may have to be revised by the Lead State. Order of precedence clauses cover conflicts in language, not additional language. Courts will harmonize terms wherever possible, and additional language typically will be given effect unless it overtly conflicts other language. So, for example, a contractor’s warranty provisions would apply to an RFP silent on warranty requirements. However, some clarification might be required if the RFP specifies a warranty term and the contractor’s warranty term is more favorable that the warranty in the RFP. Attachment A
NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions. 17. The Business Reference Response to Reference Questionnaire has a deadline of September 8, 2014. What is the date these forms needs to be sent in by? Please use updated form attached. RFP 3407 Attachment G References for Ame 18. Do we have to include all of our vendor parts and the MSRP pricing in the proposal? No.
NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions. NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions shall supplement the terms and conditions of this Contract. To the extent there is any inconsistent or conflicting term between the two, the conflict or inconsistency shall be resolved in a manner most favorable to a Purchaser or Purchasing Entity.
NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions. Section 33. Usage of Trade; Course of Dealings; Implied Warranties Contractor shall also be bound by any other implied warranty that, at the time of execution of the Contract, prevails in the trade of government in the marketing area in and about the State of Nevada. Contractor shall also be bound by any other implied warranty arising through course of dealings between Contractor and the State from and after the execution of the Contract. Contractor shall also be bound by all warranties set forth in Nevada's Uniform Commercial Code (NRS Title 8) in effect on the date of execution of the Contract.
NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions. The Lead State discourages exceptions to contract terms and conditions in the RFP and the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions. Exceptions may cause a Proposal to be rejected as nonresponsive when, in the sole judgment of the Lead State (and its evaluation committee) the Proposal appears to be conditioned on the exception or correction of what is deemed to be a deficiency or unacceptable exception and would require a substantial proposal rewrite to correct. Offerors should identify or seek to clarify any problems with contract language or any other document contained within this RFP through their written inquiries about the RFP using the process in Section 2.1. Moreover, Offerors are cautioned that award may be made on receipt of initial proposals without clarification or an opportunity for discussion, and the nature of exceptions would be evaluated. Further, the nature of exceptions will be considered in the competitive range determination if one is conducted. In the sole discretion of the Lead State, exceptions may be evaluated to determine the extent to which; the alternative language or approach poses unreasonable, additional risk to the state; the exception inhibits achieving the objectives of the RFP; or the exception’s ambiguity makes evaluation difficult and a fair resolution (available to all Offerors) impractical given the timeframe for the RFP. Exceptions may result in a Proposal being rejected as nonresponsive and the Lead State is under no obligation to consider exceptions. Proposed exceptions and/or additions to Attachment A – NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions, including the exhibits, must be submitted in this section. Offeror must provide all proposed exceptions and/or additions, including an Offeror’s terms and conditions, license agreements, or service level agreements in Microsoft Word format for redline editing. Offeror must also provide the name, contact information, and access to the individual(s) that will be directly involved in terms and conditions negotiations. If there are no exceptions or additions to Attachment A – NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions, provide a document with “None” in the body. Title this document – [Offeror Name] Exceptions Additions to T&Cs
NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions. The NASPO ValuePoint administrative fee shall be submitted quarterly and is based on the actual sales of all products and services. The NASPO ValuePoint administrative fee must be included when determining the pricing offered. The NASPO ValuePoint administrative fee is not negotiable and shall not be added as a separate line item on an invoice. Additionally, some NASPO ValuePoint participating entities may require that an administrative fee be paid directly to the NASPO ValuePoint participating entity on purchases made by purchasing entities within that State. For all such requests, the fee percentage, payment method and payment schedule for the participating entity's administrative fee will be incorporated in the Participating Addendum. The Contractor may adjust the Master Agreement pricing accordingly for purchases made by purchasing entities within the jurisdiction of the State. All such agreements may not affect the NASPO ValuePoint fee or the prices paid by the purchasing entities outside the jurisdiction of the participating entities requesting the additional fee.
