No Build Analysis Sample Clauses

No Build Analysis. The CONSULTANT will analyze the operational performance of the No Build Alternative for the analysis years to identify deficiencies related to the purpose and need for the project. The CONSULTANT will evaluate the operational effectiveness of the No Build Alternative using agreed upon performance measures of effectiveness (XXXx). The analysis should include multimodal evaluation for pedestrian, bicycle, freight, and transit modes, as appropriate.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
No Build Analysis. Using the projected data, the Engineer shall analyze the No-build scenarios in the corresponding projection years using HCS and TDM. Anticipated measures of effectiveness to be reported include multimodal levels of service and travel time. A list of No-Build conditions scenarios to be simulated are as follows: • AM Opening Year No Build • Mid-Day Opening Year No Build • PM Opening Year No Build • AM Interim Year No Build • Mid-Day Interim Year No Build • PM Interim Year No Build • AM Ultimate Year No Build • Mid-Day Ultimate Year No Build • PM Ultimate Year No Build Population and employment growth and changes in land use shall also be analyzed in order to provide a detailed understanding of the study corridor assumed during the projected years. The projected No-build analysis shall be chronicled to compare against the existing conditions analysis. The No-build analysis report shall include a technical memorandum detailing the investigations and analysis conducted and shall include informative maps and other graphics depicting the No-build condition analysis and deficiencies.
Sample 1
No Build Analysis. Using the projected data from the H-GAC model and VISUM model, the Engineer shall analyze the No-build scenarios in the corresponding projection years using HCS as needed. VISUM offers the capability to capture a range of performance measures that can be used for No-build analysis. This includes v/c ratio, delay, vehicle miles travelled, vehicle hours travelled. It also provides a platform to seamlessly export it to VISTRO (intersection capacity analysis) and VISSIM (microscopic simulation), if needed to conduct detailed analysis. Population and employment growth and changes in land use shall also be analyzed by the Engineer in order to provide a detailed understanding of the study corridor assumed during the projected years. The projected No-build analysis shall be chronicled by the Engineer to compare against the existing conditions analysis. The No-build analysis report prepared by the Engineer shall include a technical memorandum detailing the investigations and analysis conducted and shall include informative maps and other graphics depicting the No-build condition analysis and any deficiencies. The Engineer shall provide the following deliverables:
Sample 1
No Build Analysis. The Engineer shall reevaluate traffic demand and patterns along the study area using H-GAC’s most recent regional travel demand model for future years 2025, 2035 and 2040. Major origins- destinations of corridor traffic will be identified by conducting select-link analysis. Using the projected data, the Engineer shall analyze the No-build scenario in the corresponding projection years, 2025, 2035, and 2040 for the study corridor. The future travel patterns will be updated as follows: • Major origins-destinations of corridor traffic will be identified by conducting select-link analysis at a maximum of 15 locations identified in previous task • Percent distribution of traffic to major destinations such as Downtown Houston • Percent of local versus through traffic • Average travel speeds and level-of-service (LOS) • Modal splits (SOV versus HOV trips • Directional distribution (northbound versus southbound) • Percent peak hour traffic of total daily traffic • Projected traffic growth over existing traffic volumes Population and employment growth and changes in land use shall also be analyzed in order to provide a detailed understanding of the study corridor assumed during the projected years. The projected No-build analysis shall be chronicled to compare against the existing conditions analysis. The No-build analysis report shall include a technical memorandum detailing the investigations and analysis conducted and shall include informative maps and other graphics depicting the No-build condition analysis and any deficiencies. The Engineer shall provide the following deliverables:
Sample 1

Related to No Build Analysis

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall 45th-day FTSE inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The goal of this task is to collect operational data from the project, to analyze that data for economic and environmental impacts, and to include the data and analysis in the Final Report. Formulas will be provided for calculations. A Final Report data collection template will be provided by the Energy Commission. The Recipient shall: • Develop data collection test plan. • Troubleshoot any issues identified. • Collect data, information, and analysis and develop a Final Report which includes: o Total gross project costs. o Length of time from award of bus(es) to project completion. o Fuel usage before and after the project.

  • Industrial Operations Analyst (IOA ‌ The IOA is a GSA Government official who audits Contractor records and conducts Contractor Assistance Visits (CAVs) to the Contractor’s place of business to assist the Contractor with task order reporting, Contract Access Fee (CAF) management, and other general contract administration functions deemed necessary by the Government.

  • Drug Test Results 1. All records pertaining to department-required drug tests shall remain confidential, and shall not be provided to other employers or agencies without the written permission of the person whose records are sought. However, medical, administrative, and immediate supervisory personnel may have access to relevant portions of the records as necessary to insure the acceptable performance of the officer's job duties.

  • Project Plan Development of Project Plan Upon the Authorized User’s request, the Contractor must develop a Project Plan. This Project Plan may include Implementation personnel, installation timeframes, escalation procedures and an acceptance plan as appropriate for the Services requested. Specific requirements of the plan will be defined in the RFQ. In response to the RFQ, the Contractor must agree to furnish all labor and supervision necessary to successfully perform Services procured from this Lot. Project Plan Document The Contractor will provide to the Authorized User, a Project Plan that may contain the following items: • Name of the Project Manager, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • Names of the Project Team Members, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • A list of Implementation milestones based on the Authorized User’s desired installation date; • A list of responsibilities of the Authorized User during system Implementation; • A list of designated Contractor Authorized Personnel; • Escalation procedures including management personnel contact numbers; • Full and complete documentation of all Implementation work; • Samples of knowledge transfer documentation; and • When applicable, a list of all materials and supplies required to complete the Implementation described in the RFQ. Materials and Supplies Required to Complete Implementation In the event that there are items required to complete an Implementation, the Contractor may request the items be added to its Contract if the items meet the scope of the Contract. Negotiation of Final Project Plan If the Authorized User chooses to require a full Project Plan, the State further reserves the right for Authorized Users to negotiate the final Project Plan with the apparent RFQ awardee. Such negotiation must not substantively change the scope of the RFQ plan, but can alter timeframes or other incidental factors of the final Project Plan. The Authorized User will provide the Contractor a minimum of five (5) business days’ notice of the final negotiation date. The Authorized User reserves the right to move to the next responsible and responsive bidder if Contractor negotiations are unsuccessful.

  • Project Summary The main objective of the LIFE GAIA Sense project is to demonstrate gaiasense, an innovative “Smart Farming” (SF) solution that aims at reducing the consumption of natural resources, as a way to protect the environment and support Circular Economy (CE) models. More specifically, this project will launch 18 demonstrators across Greece, Spain and Portugal covering 9 crops (olives, peaches, cotton, pistachio, potatoes, table tomatoes, industrial tomatoes, grapes, kiwi) in various terrain and microclimatic conditions. They will demonstrate an innovative method, based on high-end technology, which is suitable for being replicated and will be accessible and affordable to Farmers either as individuals or collectively through Agricultural Cooperatives. Moreover, LIFE GAIA Sense aims to promote resource efficiency practices in SMEs of the agricultural sector and eventually, contribute to the implementation of the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. This project will demonstrate a method on how the farmer will be able to decide either to use or avoid inputs (irrigation, fertilizers, pesticides etc.) in a most efficient way, without risking the annual production. The focus is on the resource consumption reduction side of CE, and the results will be both qualitatively and quantitatively, considering the resources’ efficiency in agricultural sector.

  • Design Review At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.