Traffic Analysis. The [ ] shall require a developer to submit a Traffic Impact Analysis Checklist (Exhibit B, attached) and a Channelization Plan Checklist (Exhibit D, attached) as part of the developer’s development application. See Section
5.1. At a minimum, the traffic analysis shall consist of Section 1 of the checklist, fully completed and signed by the developer. The STATE may only require a traffic study consistent with Section 2 of the checklist if one of the following two conditions is met: (1) the development generates more than [NEGOTIABLE: e.g., 50 PM] peak-hour trips; or, (2) the development will add [NEGOTIABLE: e.g., ten (10)] or more PM peak-hour trips to an LOS "F" intersection or HAL location. Only the STATE may waive the requirement for traffic analysis studies.
a. STATE will use [ ] approved trip reduction credits for TDM measures in determining traffic impacts on State transportation facilities.
b. STATE may request supplemental information and analysis as necessary to determine development impacts, if any, on State transportation facilities. Supplemental information may include explanatory information, detailed documentation or further analysis to clarify or expand on data provided in the traffic analysis.
Traffic Analysis. Conduct traffic analysis and studies as requested. Assess existing and proposed facilities to demonstrate their impacts on traffic operations. Tasks provided can encompass a varying scale of studies from qualitative justifications to full detailed reporting and modeling depending on the City’s needs.
Traffic Analysis. The ENGINEER shall perform work for the Mobility Authority to analyze up to three scenarios using the year 2040 T&R forecasts developed by the T&R consultant. This task will generally include volume development for the AM and PM peak hours, developing corridor models, and compiling and comparing the results. Task 1: Volume Development Utilizing area traffic counts and the 24-hour volumes from the T&R study prepared by the T&R Consultant, the ENGINEER will develop a line diagram depicting AM and PM peak hour volumes. • Line diagram depicting AM and PM peak hour volumes.
Traffic Analysis. Xxxxxxx will use the published existing ADT from available County maps. Xxxxxxx will coordinate with CMAP to obtain 2030 traffic projections.
Traffic Analysis. 1.1.1.1 High level analysis and related discussion;
1.1.1.2 Facilitation of two meetings to discuss transportation;
1.1.1.3 Document relationships involved with transportation issues – coordination between Missoula County, District, and Montana Department of Transportation;
Traffic Analysis. 13 The traffic operation analyses to support the environmental air quality and noise studies for the Dos Lagos 14 segment is done under a separate contract. The findings from that traffic study will be incorporated into the 15 CEQA analysis for the Dos Lagos segment of Temescal Canyon Road.
Traffic Analysis. 18 The traffic operation analyses will support the environmental air quality study and noise study for Temescal 00 Xxxxxx Xxxx Improvements between I-15/Temescal Canyon interchange and X-00/Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx 00 interchange. Temescal Canyon Road would be widened to be a 4-lane roadway between following three 21 segments, which will be described and analyzed as separate projects within one comprehensive traffic 22 analysis report: 23
24 1. Xxxxxx Canyon Road to 0.7 miles north 25 2. Xxxxx Road to Dos Lagos Drive
Traffic Analysis. Consultant shall perform traffic analysis for all traffic count locations, and identify deficiencies and the year the deficiency is expected to occur. Operational analysis for all facilities, regardless of jurisdiction, must include: o v/c ratio o LOS o queuing o turning movements All traffic volumes must use the 30th Highest Hour. All traffic count analysis must be submitted to TPAU, WOCPM, City, and RVMPO.
Traffic Analysis. Consultant shall prepare a traffic analysis on the Preferred Scenario to assess the impacts on the transportation system. Consultant shall use the TPAU provided outputs of the BMPO regional travel demand model maintained by TPAU to prepare the traffic analysis. The traffic analysis must be post processed and must measure impacts against both the revised performance measures and adopted standards. Consultant shall allow three (3) weeks for output after a model request has been submitted and verified for completeness. Consultant shall use the Model Request Form available at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/ODOT/TD/TP/Pages/Tools.aspx#modeling. The planning horizon year is the most current BMPO model year to provide consistency with other local and regional planning efforts. Consultant shall prepare Transportation Analysis Zone data and network changes for the Preferred Scenario model run. The analysis must use the BMPO travel demand model that is available at the time the model request is made. The Project must not delay for revisions to the existing or future BMPO models. For City roadways, the Consultant shall follow the City Roundabout Design Guidelines which includes analysis criteria for intersections. The City has developed roundabout capacity analysis methods based on the system of roundabouts in the City - xxxx://xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/index.aspx?page=173. Consultant shall provide all traffic analysis work in electronic format (as Synchro, HCS+, or Micro Station, etc. files).
1. Consultant shall prepare Final Traffic Analysis Report based on City and APM review comments on the draft.
Traffic Analysis. Consultant will complete a traffic analysis to meet the requirements of Deschutes County Code 18.116.310. Specific tasks will include:
1. Determine eligibility of access road per Table P-3 of the AIP Handbook. Summarize alternatives analysis conducted in the EA and identify rationale for additional airport access point and eligibility for funding under AIP guidelines. Submit to FAA for review and comment.
2. Develop trip generation and trip distribution estimates for the proposed development.
3. Based on the assumed trip generation and trip distribution, identify the necessary study intersections for inclusion in the transportation impact analysis. For the purposes of this scope and budget, we are assuming two intersections will be studied. Additional intersections will require revisions to the scope and budget.
4. Complete a Scoping Memorandum that documents key assumptions of the transportation analysis, including trip generation, trip distribution, and study intersections. This memorandum will be submitted to the internal team for review prior to discussion with Deschutes County. This scope and budget may be revised based on the feedback from Deschutes County on that memorandum.
5. Conduct weekday p.m. peak period (4:00-6:00 p.m.) traffic counts at up to two study intersections.
6. Review 5 years of crash history at the study intersections.
7. Conduct a site visit to assess available sight distance at the proposed site access location with XxXxxxx Road.
8. Evaluate traffic operations during the following conditions: Existing conditions Build-out year (with and without development) Build-out year + 5 years with development o Evaluate right-turn lane and left-turn lane warrants for the proposed development. o Evaluate need for mitigation measures. Propose measures as necessary. o Document findings in a draft memorandum that will be submitted to the internal team for review.
9. Finalize memorandum based on team feedback.
10. Prepare and make a summary presentation to Deschutes County staff or Commissioners.
11. Respond to County comments and provide revise reports as required.
