Order of Importance Sample Clauses

Order of Importance. All evaluation factors other than price are significantly more important than price. Within Past Performance, all subfactors are about equal. The Government reserves the right to make an award to other than the Offeror who submits the lowest overall evaluated price, using a Best Value trade-off analysis method of procurement. Offerors must receive a rating of at least Acceptable on all factors to be eligible for award.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Order of Importance. Small Business Reserve: Factors A and B (Non-Price), when combined, are significantly more important than Factor C (Price).
Sample 1
Order of Importance. The Technical Factor is more important than the Cost Factor. The Cost Factor is significantly more important than Small Business Participation Factor. The non-Cost Factors, when combined, are significantly more important than the Cost Factor.
Sample 1
Order of Importance. All evaluation factors other than price when combined are significantly more important the price. Within the non-price factors, Technical is significantly more important than the Small Business Utilization Factor. The Government reserves the right to make the award to an Offeror other than the Offeror that submits the lowest overall evaluated price, using a Best Value trade-off analysis method of procurement. Offerors must receive a rating of Acceptable or better on all factors to be eligible for award.
Sample 1
Order of Importance. All evaluation factors other than price when combined are significantly more important the price. Within the non- price factors, Technical is significantly more important than the Small Business Utilization Factor. The Government reserves the right to make the award to an Offeror other than the Offeror that submits the lowest overall evaluated price, using a Best Value trade-off analysis method of procurement. Offerors must receive a rating of Acceptable or better on all factors to be eligible for award. Offerors are required to provide sufficient information concerning facility capability/capacity in order to demonstrate ability to meet the required delivery date outlined in FAR 52.211-8. The technical proposal must include the following 3 subfactors: (1) current Work in Progress (WIP) report; (2) Milestone Plan, and (3) Subcontractor/Teaming arrangements. The offeror will be evaluated to determine the extent the offeror has the facility capability and capacity to meet the proposed delivery date. The Technical proposals will be rated as follows: Adjectival Rating Description Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional technical approach and understanding of the requirements to meeting the required delivery date, with an appropriate planning schedule and capacity, it contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low. Good Proposal indicates a thorough technical approach and understanding of the requiremnets to meeting the required delivery date, with an appropriate planning schedule and capacity, it contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate. Acceptable Proposal meets the technical requirements and indicates an adequate approach to meeting the required delivery date, with an appropriate planning schedule and capacity and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate technical approach to meeting the required delivery date, with an appropriate planning schedule and capacity and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high. Proposal is unawardable. Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the technical requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable. Rating Description Low Has little potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Normal contractor effort and normal Government moni...
Sample 1
Order of Importance. All evaluation factors other than price when combined are significantly more important than price. Past performance is significantly more important than Small Business Participation. Within Past Performance, the importance of all evaluation factors is approximately equal. The Government reserves the right to make the award to an Offeror other than the Offeror that submits the lowest overall evaluated price, using a Best Value trade-off analysis method of procurement. Offerors must receive a rating of Acceptable or better on all factors to be eligible for award. Evaluation Factors and Sub-factors: The Government intends to award to the responsible Offeror that proposes the best value to the Government, based on the evaluation of these factors and sub-factors: • Past Performance Factor o Sub-Factor 1: Quality o Sub-Factor 2: Timeliness of Delivery • Small Business Utilization Factor • Price Factor The Government will find Offerors that do not propose on all above factors and sub-factors non-compliant and remove them from the pool. Offerors will submit proposals in accordance with Section L.
Sample 1

Related to Order of Importance

  • Order of Layoff Employees shall be laid off in order of seniority pursuant to Government Code Sections 19997.2 through 19997.7 and applicable State Personnel Board and Department of Personnel Administration rules.

  • Order of Business The order of business at all meetings of stockholders shall be as determined by the chairman of the meeting.

  • Order of Disclosure If a court or a Government Authority or entity with the right, power, and apparent authority to do so requests or requires any Party, by subpoena, oral deposition, interrogatories, requests for production of documents, administrative order, or otherwise, to disclose Confidential Information, that Party shall provide the other Parties with prompt notice of such request(s) or requirement(s) so that the other Parties may seek an appropriate protective order or waive compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the absence of a protective order or waiver, the Party may disclose such Confidential Information which, in the opinion of its counsel, the Party is legally compelled to disclose. Each Party will use Reasonable Efforts to obtain reliable assurance that confidential treatment will be accorded any Confidential Information so furnished.

  • Order of Recall As vacancies occur, employees will be recalled to available work in the order of the seniority providing skill; competence and ability are considered substantially equal in the judgment of the Employer. Subject to the above qualifications, an employee on layoff shall be offered reinstatement to vacant positions prior to any employees being newly hired and after any appropriate internal transfers as further set forth in this section. Employees regularly assigned to a specific unit, department or facility will be given preferential consideration for transfer to other shifts or positions in that unit, department or facility over all other employees except more senior employees returning from layoff status to their previous unit and shift or position and department/facility. If any offer of recall is accepted, the employee shall be deemed recalled and be removed from the recall roster. Any recall of employees out of seniority will be communicated to the Union representative in advance of the recall.

  • Project Meetings The Contractor shall attend a preconstruction conference and shall participate in regularly scheduled Project meetings.

  • Order of Precedence For purchase transactions under this Contract, the order of precedence shall be as follows: this Contract; Appendix A, Standard Terms and Conditions For Products and Related Services Contracts; Appendix B, Vendor’s Historically Underutilized Businesses Subcontracting Plan; Appendix C, Pricing Index; Exhibit 1, Vendor’s Response to RFO DIR-TSO-TMP-398, including all addenda; and Xxxxxxx 0, XXX XXX-XXX-XXX-000, including all addenda; are incorporated by reference and constitute the entire agreement between DIR and Vendor governing purchase transactions. In the event of a conflict between the documents listed in this paragraph related to purchases, the controlling document shall be this Contract, then Appendix A, then Appendix B, then Appendix C, then Exhibit 1, and finally Exhibit 2. In the event and to the extent any provisions contained in multiple documents address the same or substantially the same subject matter but do not actually conflict, the more recent provisions shall be deemed to have superseded earlier provisions.

  • NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC EVENTS AND MEETINGS 2 A. CONTRACTOR shall notify ADMINISTRATOR of any public event or meeting funded in 3 whole or in part by the COUNTY, except for those events or meetings that are intended solely to serve 4 clients or occur in the normal course of business. 5 B. CONTRACTOR shall notify ADMINISTRATOR at least thirty (30) business days in advance 6 of any applicable public event or meeting. The notification must include the date, time, duration, 7 location and purpose of the public event or meeting. Any promotional materials or event related flyers 8 must be approved by ADMINISTRATOR prior to distribution. 9

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Production of Witnesses At all times from and after the Distribution Date, upon reasonable request: (a) FTD shall use commercially reasonable efforts to make available, or cause to be made available, to any member of the UOL Entities, the directors, officers, employees and agents of any member of the FTD Entities as witnesses to the extent that the same may reasonably be required by the requesting Party (giving consideration to business demands of such directors, officers, employees and agents) in connection with any legal, administrative or other proceeding in which the requesting Party may from time to time be involved, except in the case of any action, suit or proceeding in which any member of the FTD Entities is adverse to any member of the UOL Entities; and (b) United Online shall use commercially reasonable efforts to make available, or cause to be made available, to any member of the FTD Entities, the directors, officers, employees and agents of any member of the UOL Entities as witnesses to the extent that the same may reasonably be required by the requesting Party (giving consideration to business demands of such directors, officers, employees and agents) in connection with any legal, administrative or other proceeding in which the requesting Party may from time to time be involved, except in the case of any action, suit or proceeding in which any member of the UOL Entities is adverse to any member of the FTD Entities.

  • Protocol The attached Protocol shall be an integral part of this Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!