Outcome Targets Sample Clauses

Outcome Targets. Outcome targets will be expected to include the following, and will be developed with the successful Service Provider/s. Descriptor Target Evidence Monitoring Education, employment, training and volunteering Percentage of young people in employment, education, training and for 16+ hours per week 90% Case files Monitoring returns Participation & Leisure Percentage of young people participating in constructive activities 100% Case files Monitoring returns Outcomes star Percentage of young people that have had an increase in their overall outcomes star score each quarter 80% Case files Monitoring returns Percentage of young people using the 100% Case files Monitoring returns Descriptor Target Evidence Monitoring outcome star tool Move on % of service users moving on in a positive and planned way 100% Case files Monitoring returns
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Outcome Targets. (1) Evaluation Indicators (Operation and Effect Indicators) Indicators Target (2014, 2 years after project completion) Average traffic volume per day over 42,186 one year (vehicles/day) Reduction of travel time (million 2,519 rupees/year) Saving of transportation costs 2,797 (million rupees/year) Reduction of traffic accidents 131 (million rupees/year) Targets are set assuming the construction of the southern section (Kaduwela-Kottawa). (2) Number of Beneficiaries 433,080 people (3) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) (Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR)) Based on the following assumptions, this project’s Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) is set at 13.0%. Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) Costs: Project costs (excluding costs of land acquisition, tax), operation and maintenance costs Benefits: Saving of travel costs, saving of travel time, reduction in traffic accidents Project Life: 15 years
Outcome Targets. A sustainable transport system that meets the needs of a growing city region economy. Halt the decline in public transport patronage - potential indicator - no. of public transport journeys (to be confirmed when LTP completed) Reduced average journey times to Leeds and Manchester (Target to be developed via local/national dialogue)
Outcome Targets. (1) Evaluation Indicators (Operation and Effect Indicator) Indicator Baseline Target (2005) (2012 [three years after completion of project]) Facility utilization rate (%) (Note 88.14% 100% or less 1) Load rejection (MW) (Note 2) 78MW (overall) 0MW Voltage drop ratio (%) (Note 3) 81% (average) 100%±10% (Note 1) Average values for existing substations targeted by this project. For the facility utilization rate concerning newly installed substations, the utilization rates for substations currently providing electrical power to the same areas are used. It is
Outcome Targets.  Applications to the University from target groups.  Intake to the University from target groups.  Change in perception of higher education for participants and schools and colleges.  Impact on achievement for participants and schools and colleges.  Progression rates for participating schools and colleges.  Participation rates by postcodes of intake of the participating schools and colleges. The University is already communicating with other local HEIs regarding collaboration on evaluation activity where appropriate. The Realising Opportunities Scheme will be evaluated at a national project level.
Outcome Targets. ◼ Applications to the University from target groups. ◼ Intake to the University from target groups. ◼ Change in perception of higher education for participants and schools and colleges. ◼ Impact on achievement for participants and schools and colleges. ◼ Progression rates for participating schools and colleges. ◼ Participation rates by postcodes of intake of the participating schools and colleges. The University is already communicating with other local HEIs regarding collaboration on evaluation activity where appropriate. The Realising Opportunities Scheme will be evaluated at a national project level.
Outcome Targets. (1) Evaluation Indicator (Operation and Effect Indicator) (2) Internal Rate of Return (Financial/ Economic Internal Rate of Return) Not applicable
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Outcome Targets. (1) Quantitative effects 1) Performance Indicators (Operation and Effect Indicators) Indicator Target section Baseline (2011 Actual) Target (2018) 【2 years after the Project completionAnnual average daily traffic (vehicle/day) Tarlac IC - Aliaga IC - 13,147 Average time required (minute/vehicle) Cabanatuan - Balintawak 134 (Aliaga, via Central Luzon Expressway) 186(via Philippines - Japan Friendship Highway) 113(via Central Luzon Expressway and Central Luzon Link Expressway) Travel cost reduction due to Cabanatuan - Balintawak - 11 reduction in travel time (00 million peso/year) As a reference indicator, the number of offices in the Central Luzon region(Region III)will be monitored (79,445 as in 2009).
Outcome Targets. (1) Quantitative effects 1) Operation and Effect Indicator Indicator Original (2008) (※1) Target (2020)(※1) 【3 years after completion of the project】 Actual Irrigated Area (※2) (ha) 25,362 35,670 (Wet season/dry season) (※ 3) Yield(xxxxx)(t/ha) 3.30~4.55 (Wet season) 2.80~4.30 (Dry season) 5.00 (Wet season) 4.80 (Dry season) Volume of Production (paddy) (t/year) 181,230 297,266 Irrigation Service Fee Collection Efficiency (%) 14~91 (Wet season) 30~91 (Dry season) Increase by 10% (Wet season/dry season) (※ 3)
Outcome Targets. (1) Evaluation Indicators (Operation and Effect Indicators) Indicators Targets (2015, 2 years after project completion) Number of loans (cases) 75,000 Total amount of approved loans (rupee) 2,000,000,000 Percentage of targeted beneficiaries (end users) who are taking 90% on loans for the second time (or more) (%) Rate of repayment by settlement date (%) 90% Percentages of beneficiaries who rise above the poverty line 50% (2) Number of beneficiaries Total of 315,000 people
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!