Panel Decision on Appeal Sample Clauses

Panel Decision on Appeal. Upon receipt of the teacher’s written notice of Summative Rating Appeal Form, the Evaluation Review Panel will conduct an expedited review of the basis for the appeal. The decision of the panel is final and not subject to further review. The panel shall notify the appealing teacher, original evaluator, and Administrator for Human Resources, in writing of its decision to uphold or revoke the “unsatisfactory” rating within fifteen (15) workdays after its receipt of the written notice of appeal. The 15-day review process begins with the receipt of the written notice of appeal. Supporting materials are due to the Review Panel by the 5th day of this review period. ● Upon conclusion of an unsuccessful appeal, the thirty (30) day timeline for the remediation plan will begin. ● If the Evaluation Appeal Panel revokes an “unsatisfactory” rating, the teacher will be assigned a “needs improvement” rating and a professional development plan will be developed in accordance with Section 24A, with the thirty-day timeline to develop the professional development plan beginning on the day the teacher is notified of the assignment of the needs improvement rating. Summative Rating Appeal Form Teacher’s Name: Date: School and Position: Evaluating Administrator’s Name: Date of Summative Rating/Summative Evaluation Meeting: Date of Follow-up Meeting (optional): Please detail below the reason/reasons why the “unsatisfactory” rating is erroneous and identify any factors or evidence to support the basis for appeal. Evidence may include rebuttals to written feedback. Feel free to add additional pages and attach any and all documentation/evidence which would assist the panel in making an informed decision. I would like to request the following District 39 administrator who is a qualified evaluator to participate in the Evaluation Review Panel: I understand and agree that by signing this document the timeline for the development and commencement of the remediation plan is suspended pending the conclusion of the appeal process. Upon conclusion of an unsuccessful appeal, the timeline for the remediation plan will begin. Teacher’s Signature Date APPENDIX C
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Panel Decision on Appeal. Upon receipt of the teacher’s written record of the rating, the panel of qualified evaluators will conduct an expedited review of the basis for the appeal. The panel shall notify the parties in writing of its decision to uphold or revoke the unsatisfactory rating within ten (10) teacher workdays after receipt of the written record of the rating. The panel’s determination is reached with a majority vote. If a majority vote to overturn the rating is not reached, the original rating stands. The decision of the panel is final. If the Appeal Panel votes to nullify the rating, a district administrator and the Association president will make a presentation to the exclusive bargaining committee representing the Association and the administration who will then bargain a new rating. Upon conclusion of the appeals process, a formal letter will be written by the panel as an addendum to the summative evaluation that outlines the decision of the appeals process.

Related to Panel Decision on Appeal

  • Decision Making The JDC shall make decisions unanimously, with each Party’s representatives collectively having one (1) vote and at least one (1) representative from each Party participating in such decision. In the event the JDC determines that it cannot reach an agreement regarding a decision within the JDC’s authority, then, within *** Business Days after such determination: (a) for any matter that is not a Critical Issue *** shall have the final decision making authority on such matter; and (b) for any matter that is a Critical Issue, the matter shall be referred to FivePrime’s Chief Executive Officer (or designee) and HGS’ Chief Executive Officer (or designee) for resolution. If such executives cannot resolve the matter within *** Business Days, then the Chief Executive Officer of *** (or designee) shall have the final decision making authority on such matter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Development Plan shall not be amended, without FivePrime’s prior written approval (which approval may be withheld in FivePrime’s sole discretion), to: (i) increase or materially change the nature of FivePrime-Conducted Trials or Other FivePrime-Conducted Activities; or (ii) require FivePrime to continue any FivePrime-Conducted Trial if FivePrime, in its reasonable judgment, decides not to continue such trial for any business, scientific, safety, efficacy, enrollment or ethical reason, provided that, in the event FivePrime so decides to discontinue such trial, HGS shall have no further obligation to reimburse FivePrime under Section 4.2(d) except with respect to costs *** INDICATES MATERIAL THAT WAS OMITTED AND FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT WAS REQUESTED. ALL SUCH OMITTED MATERIAL WAS FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. already incurred by FivePrime prior to such discontinuation and any and all standard close out costs incurred thereafter, and HGS shall have the right to continue such trial by itself at its expense. When *** make a final determination under this Section 3.4, that final determination must be consistent with the terms of this Agreement.

  • Shared Decision Making 33-1 Purpose The purpose of a shared decision making program is to create an atmosphere in which decision making is a collegial, shared, process that fosters an exchange of ideas and information necessary for effective professional practice and for improved student performance. The Association and District agree to continue pursuing jointly the implementation of legitimately recognized school councils as a foundation of a shared decision-making program. All provisions of this Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect throughout the process.

  • Hearing Decision The decision of the Board shall be in writing and shall contain findings of fact and the personnel action approved, if any. The findings may reiterate the language of the pleadings or simply refer to them. The decision of the Board shall be certified to the Superintendent or designee who recommended the personnel action, and he/she shall enforce and follow this decision. A copy of the decision shall be delivered to the appellant or his/her designated representative personally or by registered mail. The decision of the Board shall be final.

  • Automated decisions For purposes hereof “automated decision” shall mean a decision by the data exporter or the data importer which produces legal effects concerning a data subject or significantly affects a data subject and which is based solely on automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to him, such as his performance at work, creditworthiness, reliability, conduct, etc. The data importer shall not make any automated decisions concerning data subjects, except when:

  • Initial Decision Maker The Architect will serve as the Initial Decision Maker pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017, unless the parties appoint below another individual, not a party to this Agreement, to serve as the Initial Decision Maker. (If the parties mutually agree, insert the name, address and other contact information of the Initial Decision Maker, if other than the Architect.) « » « » « » « »

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Final Decisions The Contracting Officer will issue a final decision as required by 33.211 if—

  • Hiring Decisions Contractor shall make the final determination of whether an Economically Disadvantaged Individual referred by the System is "qualified" for the position.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.