Performance Comparisons Sample Clauses

Performance Comparisons. Table 1 shows a comparative analysis of the computational cost among the related protocols. In addition, even though the proposed protocol has a bit of computational overhead than Xxxxxxx et al.’s protocol,the proposed protocol assures higher security and privacy, and affords resistance to the most well-known attacks, while providing functionality.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Comparisons. Licensee shall not distribute externally or to third parties, any reports or statements that directly compare the speed, functionality or other performance results of the Products with any similar third party products without the prior written approval of Artisan.
Sample 1
Performance Comparisons. In Table 4, we compare the computational cost with related schemes. Th denotes the computation time for the hash function; Tx denotes the XOR operation; TF denotes the fuzzy extraction; TE denotes the ECC multiplication; Tenc denotes the encryption/decryption. The computation cost of ours is a bit higher than [13,14] because of the usage of biometrics and ECC, but it is considered to be operationally viable in WSNs [15,18]. Additionally, our proposed scheme provides the enhanced security functionalities and is secure against various attacks. Table 4. Comparisons of the computation costs. Computation Cost Scheme Registration Login & Authentication Total User 2Th + Tx 9Th + 9Tx 11Th + 10Tx Xxx et al.’s [13] GWN 6Th + 3Tx 8Th + 8Tx 14Th + 11Tx Sensor 0 2Th + 2Tx 2Th + 2Tx User 2Th + Tx 9Th + 5Tx 11Th + 6Tx Xxxxx et al.’s [14] GWN 5Th + 3Tx 10Th + 4Tx 15Th + 7Tx Sensor 0 4Th + Tx 4Th + Tx User Th 3Th + 2Tx + 2TE 4Th + 2Tx + 2TE Xxxx and Xxx’x [15] GWN 2Th + 2Tx 4Th 6Th + 2Tx Sensor 0 3Th + 2TE 3Th + 2TE User Th + TF 10Th + 2Tx + TF + Tenc + 2TE 11Th + 2Tx + 2TF + Tenc + 2TE Xxxx et al.’s [18] GWN 3Th + 3Tx 10Th + Tx + 2Tenc 13Th + 4Tx + 2Tenc Sensor 0 6Th + Tenc + 2TE 6Th + Tenc + 2TE User Th + TF 9Th + 4Tx + TF + 2TE 10Th + 4Tx + 2TF + 2TE Proposed GWN 5Th + 3Tx 11Th + 4Tx 16Th + 7Tx Sensor 0 4Th + Tx + 2TE 4Th + Tx + 2TE
Sample 1
Performance Comparisons. Licensee shall not distribute externally or disclose to any Customer or to any third party any reports or statements that directly compare the speed, functionality or other performance results or characteristics of the Software with any similar third party products without the express prior written consent of ON Semiconductor in each instance; provided, however, that Licensee may disclose such reports or statements to Licensee’s consultants (i) that have a need to have access to such reports or statements for purposes of the license grant of this Agreement, and (ii) that have entered into a written confidentiality agreement with Licensee no less restrictive than that certain NDA.
Sample 1

Related to Performance Comparisons

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Measure The specific representation of a process or outcome that is relevant to the assessment of performance; it is quantifiable and can be documented

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Performance Objectives 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.