Post-Tenure Review Timeline Sample Clauses

Post-Tenure Review Timeline. Consistent with Cascadia’s culture of assessment, faculty shall take part in periodic Post-Tenure Reviews. Tenured faculty shall undertake Post-Tenure Review during the fourth and eighth years following the awarding of tenure and afterwards, on a five- year cycle. However, faculty may defer a Post-Tenure Review process for one (1) academic year with the approval of the Chief Academic Officer or designee in circumstances such as:
Sample 1Sample 2See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Post-Tenure Review Timeline. By the end of the eighth week of spring quarter, the appropriate Xxxx for Student Learning or designee will inform each of the faculty members who are to be reviewed (Reviewee) during the following academic year. No later than the 4th week of the following fall quarter, the Review Team shall be formed. The Post-Tenure Review will start in fall quarter and generally culminate no later than the seventh (7th) week of spring quarter. The Post-Tenure Review process deadlines may be extended by mutual consent of the Review Faculty and the Review Team as long as the Post-Tenure Review is completed within one year of the originally-scheduled completion date. The following chart summarizes the timeline: Action Date By Whom Reviewee notified By end of the 8th week of spring quarter in prior year Xxxx Review Team formed No later than the end of the 4th week of Fall quarter Xxxx and 2 Tenured Faculty on Review Team First meeting of the Review Team By the end of the 5th week of fall quarter Reviewee and Review Team Classroom observations During fall and winter quarter Review Team Self-Evaluation to Post-Tenure Review Team By end of the 2nd week of spring quarter Reviewee First Draft, Post-Tenure Review Team Report to Reviewee By the end of 4th week of the spring quarter Review Team Final Copy of Post-Tenure Review Team Report to Reviewee By the end of the 6th week of spring quarter Review Team Final Copy of Review Team Report (including classroom observation reports and Reviewee Self-Evaluation) and Optional Response Submitted to CAO By the end of 7th week of spring quarter Review Team and Reviewee CAO Response By the end of the 9th week of spring quarter CAO
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)

Related to Post-Tenure Review Timeline

  • Post-Tenure Review For the purpose of maintaining and improving effectiveness, tenured faculty members shall be evaluated and shall submit reports as described in this Article. The Xxxx/designee and/or Athletic Director/designee shall submit written comments in response to written reports submitted by faculty members in accordance with this Article.

  • POST-REVIEW DISCOVERIES If, during the implementation of an undertaking, a previously unidentified property that may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register is encountered, or a known historic property may be affected in an unanticipated manner, the Agency Official shall follow 36 C.F.R. § 800.13(b).

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Timeline Contractor must perform the Services and deliver the Deliverables according to the following timeline: • •

  • Ongoing Review and Revisions As set forth in Section 35.7, the Parties have agreed to the coordination and exchange of data and information under this Agreement to enhance system reliability and efficient market operations as systems exist and are contemplated as of the Effective Date. The Parties expect that these systems and the technology applicable to these systems and to the collection and exchange of data will change from time to time throughout the term of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the objectives of this Agreement can be fulfilled efficiently and economically only if the Parties, from time to time, review and, as appropriate, revise the requirements stated herein in response to such changes, including deleting, adding, or revising requirements and protocols. Each Party will negotiate in good faith in response to such revisions the other Party may propose from time to time. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall require any Party to reach agreement with respect to any such changes, or to purchase, install, or otherwise implement new equipment, software, or devices, or functions, except as required to perform this Agreement.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Synchronisation Commissioning and Commercial Operation 8.1 The Developer shall provide at least forty (40) days advanced preliminary written notice and at least twenty (20) days advanced final written notice to ESCOM of the date on which it intends to synchronize the Power Project to the Grid System.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.