Tenure Review Process. In general, the tenure review process consists of a number of different activities. They include observations, evaluation of professional duties and responsibilities, candidate’s self- assessment, and appropriate meetings with the ITRC and the candidate. The following explains the specific activities required to be completed in each of the eight semesters of the tenure review process.
Tenure Review Process. The purpose of the tenure review process is to ensure that College of the Redwoods provides students with the most knowledgeable, talented, creative, professional, and student-oriented faculty available. The four-year probationary period provides sufficient time for probationary tenure-track faculty to understand the expectations for tenure, to develop the skills and acquire the experience necessary to participate successfully in the educational process, to use the District’s and other resources for professional growth, and to become a fully- participating and effective member of the college’s professional community. The process should promote professionalism and enhance academic growth by providing a useful, comprehensive assessment of all areas of performance.
Tenure Review Process. A review of the candidate’s past contributions and an evaluation of the candidate’s promise of satisfactory future contributions to the University shall be based on the departmental statement of normally expected activities and expectations for progress toward promotion and tenure (as in Article 9.3a(9) and precede a departmental recommendation on whether to grant tenure to a faculty member. This review shall take place during Fall term. It is the responsibility of each individual to inspect his/her files periodically and at the time of application for tenure to assure that it includes all pertinent information that he/she wishes used as evidence of performance in the three (3) areas of teaching, scholarship, and service. All persons who review candidates for tenure shall review the applicant's Official Personnel File, support materials, and the applicant's application before making a decision or recommendation. The sole repository for tenure materials is the Office of Human Resources. In general, the University will provide the tenure appointment only to those who are judged to have given consistent evidence of quality performance and promise during the probationary period. The department chairperson shall initiate a review and shall consult with the tenured members of the department faculty and, if applicable, with the chairperson(s) of the academic department(s) in which the faculty member is cross-appointed. If the department has fewer than three (3) tenured faculty members to serve as a tenure review committee, the faculty in consultation with the xxxx and the tenure candidate shall identify another department or departments in a related discipline to supply the necessary tenured faculty members to serve as a review committee. The chairperson shall convene a meeting of the tenured faculty specified above, at which the tenure candidate shall be given the opportunity to appear, to present information, and to answer questions regarding his/her tenure candidacy. The chairperson’s consultation shall also include requests for written recommendations from departmental tenured faculty: a) supporting tenure, b) opposing tenure, or c) abstaining or declining to respond. As a part of his/her recommendation, the chairperson shall inform the xxxx of the number of faculty making each recommendation. The tenure candidate shall also be informed of the number of persons making each recommendation. By September 30, the department chairperson shall make a separate recom...
Tenure Review Process. 12.3.1 A candidate for tenure must make the request for tenure no earlier than the winter/spring semester of the fourth academic year and no later than the beginning of the winter/spring semester of the fifth year.9 The candidate initiates the process by submitting a Case Statement (see 12.3.7) to the Xxxx and the Chair of the Standing Committee, describing what the faculty member has done to meet the tenure standards and attaching the member’s scholarship. The statement should be submitted by February 1st in the year that the faculty member requests review for tenure.
Tenure Review Process. 9.1 The timelines in the evaluation process are essential to a fair, professional and objectively administered process and should be adhered to. However, in unusual cases, dates may need to be extended and doing so will not constitute an abridgement of a probationary faculty member’s rights. Lack of planning or difficulty adhering to the evaluation schedule due to workload or scheduling conflicts will not be considered an “unusual case” justifying such an extension. If an extension is deemed necessary, the specific reason(s) will be put in writing, signed by the evaluation team members and the probationary faculty member, and included with the evaluation documents.
Tenure Review Process
