Professional Judgement Sample Clauses

Professional Judgement. The Employees who are covered under this Agreement shall exercise their professional judgment in taking appropriate actions in situations which could be directly physically hazardous to their own or client's health and safety.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Professional Judgement. Clinicians shall not be required to practice in any manner which places their professional license(s) or certification in jeopardy. In accordance with departmental policy, Chaplains shall not be required to practice in any manner that violates their religious principles or jeopardizes their denominational good standing. Professional judgment issues may be the subject of a complaint.
Professional Judgement. You as a professional consider the victim/perpetrator to be particularly vulnerable or at risk of serious harm or death.
Professional Judgement if a professional has serious concerns about a victim’s situation, they should refer the case to The C MARAC. There will be occasions where the particular context of a case gives rise to serious concerns even if the victim has been unable to disclose the information that might highlight their risk more clearly. This could reflect extreme levels of fear, learning difficulties, cultural barriers to disclosure, or language barriers This judgement would be based on the professional’s experience and/or the victim’s perception of their risk even if they do not meet criteria 2 and/or 3 below.
Professional Judgement. In all instances expert clinical judgement must be used to assess an individual’s ability to understand expectations outlined in the dialysis care agreement (Appendix 1); the risk assessment process (Appendix 4) and any behaviour management actions (Appendices 2&3) before proceeding. Consideration of factors such as learning disability and sensory or cognitive difficulties is required which will be individual to each circumstance. Staff also need to be aware of the patient’s literacy and language skills and any cultural factors. In cases where it is judged that it is not appropriate to follow this SOP, the multi- disciplinary team (MDT) should develop an individualised care plan. Any incidents should still be recorded per local policy and any adjustments to the care plan agreed by the MDT.
Professional Judgement. Comments that reveal or explain the professional judgement or discretionary nature of decision-making by any professional, including the limits of standardized instruments and the importance of holistic or contextual knowledge of the patients. “Yeah the patient, the patient sc,or the behavior that a patient shows, lets the staff know that this person may need something else. SO either by voicing it, or showing it. That they need it. Yeah, Cause we’ve had some patients in here who who would never say they have a mental health issue and yet they’re screening and hollering down the halls, something’s going on with you, so we need to talk about it. You know, uh.” [Staff, Social Services]
Professional Judgement. Judgement that is informed by professional knowledge of curriculum expectations, context, evidence of learning, methods of instruction and assessment, and the criteria and standards that indicate success in student learning. In professional practice, judgement involves a purposeful and systematic thinking process that evolves in terms of accuracy and insight with ongoing reflection and self-correction.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Professional Judgement

  • Final Judgment The Arbitration Award shall be final and binding upon the parties thereto and shall be the sole and exclusive remedy between such parties relating to the Dispute, including any claims, counterclaims, issues or accounting presented to the arbitrators. Judgment upon the Arbitration Award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. To the fullest extent permitted by law, no application or appeal to any court of competent jurisdiction may be made in connection with any question of law arising in the course of arbitration or with respect to any award made except for actions relating to enforcement of this agreement to arbitrate or any arbitral award issued hereunder and except for actions seeking interim or other provisional relief in aid of arbitration proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction.

  • INDEPENDENT MEDICAL JUDGMENT Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement or in the SignatureMD Agreement, Personalized Care Practice retains full and free discretion to, and shall, exercise his/her professional medical judgment on behalf of Program Member with respect to medical services rendered to Program Member, and nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to influence, limit or affect a physician’s independent medical judgment with respect to Personalized Care Practice’s provision of medical services to Program Member and Program Member’s medical treatment.

  • Legal Jurisdiction The agreement shall be deemed to have been concluded in Jodhpur, Rajasthan and all obligations hereunder shall be deemed to be located at Jodhpur, Rajasthan and Court within Jodhpur, Rajasthan will have Jurisdiction to the exclusion of other courts.

  • Legal Action If you are dissatisfied with the determination of your claim, and have complied with applicable state and federal law, you are entitled to seek judicial review. This review will take place in an appropriate court of law. Under state law, you may not begin court proceedings prior to the expiration of sixty (60) days after the date you filed your claim. In no event may legal action be taken against us later than three (3) years from the date you were required to file the claim. For members covered by a group (employer sponsored) health plan, your plan may be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as amended. Under federal law, if your plan is subject to ERISA you may have the right to bring legal action under section 502(a) of ERISA after you have exhausted all appeals available under the plan. That means, for both medical and administrative appeals, federal law requires that you pursue a final decision from the plan, prior to filing suit under section 502(a) of ERISA. For a medical appeal, that final decision is the determination of the appeal. You are not required to submit your claim to external review prior to filing a suit under section 502(a) of ERISA. Consult your employer to determine whether this applies to you and what your rights and obligations may be. If you are dissatisfied with the decision on your claim, and have complied with applicable state and federal law, you are entitled to seek judicial review. This review will take place in an appropriate court of law.

  • TERMS OF THE JUDGMENT 31. If the Settlement contemplated by this Stipulation is approved by the Court, Lead Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel shall request that the Court enter a Judgment, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B.

  • Competent Court The Court of Milan shall have jurisdiction over any dispute arising out of this offer to purchase.

  • Assistance in Litigation or Administrative Proceedings Covered Entity shall provide written notice to Business Associate if litigation or administrative proceeding is commenced against Covered Entity, its directors, officers, or employees, based on a claimed violation by Business Associate of HIPAA, the HIPAA Rules or other laws relating to security and privacy or PHI. Upon receipt of such notice and to the extent requested by Covered Entity, Business Associate shall, and shall cause its employees, Subcontractors, or agents assisting Business Associate in the performance of its obligations under the Contract to, assist Covered Entity in the defense of such litigation or proceedings. Business Associate shall, and shall cause its employees, Subcontractor’s and agents to, provide assistance, to Covered Entity, which may include testifying as a witness at such proceedings. Business Associate or any of its employees, Subcontractors or agents shall not be required to provide such assistance if Business Associate is a named adverse party.

  • AMENDED JUDGMENT If any amended judgment is required under Code of Civil Procedure section 384, the Parties will work together in good faith to jointly submit and a proposed amended judgment.

  • Complaints and Feedback 15.3.1 The primary responsibility for receiving feedback and investigating complaints promptly and thoroughly in respect of the Services will rest with the Provider. The Provider will have procedures in place including but not limited to a complaints framework, which are acceptable to the Department, to gather and act upon feedback and complaints from Learners and/or their representatives and employers and the wider community. The Provider must also keep a log of the complaints received which will be accessible to the Department upon request.

  • LAW APPLICABLE AND COMPETENT COURT 6.1 The Agreement is governed by [insert the national law of the NA].

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.