Public Review and Comment Sample Clauses

Public Review and Comment. These policies for administering Centers of Excellence grants were published and made available for public review and comment for a minimum of forty five (45) days. These policies were adopted after consideration of all meaningful input from the public, including broad- based participation from individuals, businesses, Tribal nations, and non-profit organizations. Public comments on these policies were accepted from February 12, 2015 – Friday, April, 17 2015, via email to: xxxxxxx@xx.xxx, or via regular mail to: CPRA, Attn: Xxxxx Xxxx, P.O. Box 44027, Baton Rouge, LA 70804.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Public Review and Comment. The City of Richmond shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to seek and consider the views of the public in a manner that reflects the nature and complexity of the undertaking and its effects on historic properties. The City shall post a list of all complete and active projects on Planning and Preservation website on a monthly basis. Upon request any member of the public can review the complete record of any undertaking. The City will accept written comments from the public on both individual undertakings and the administration of the Agreement. The City shall consider and address all requests from a member of the public to review or reconsider determinations of eligibility for an undertaking in consultation with the SHPO. The City shall take written comments from the public on an undertaking into account in completing the Section 106 review. As a part of consultation, the City shall forward copies of public comments to the SHPO and consulting parties. Public comments pertaining to adverse effects shall be governed by Stipulation VI (B). The City shall respond in writing to written comments received on the administration of this Agreement, providing copies to the SHPO and consulting parties.
Sample 1Sample 2
Public Review and Comment. The Trustee Council shall determine which records are appropriate, or legally required to be made available, for public review comment, in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. For each record to be released upon such a determination, the Trustee Council shall determine the media or format and the procedures to be followed, including the dates and length of any public comment period, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Nothing in this paragraph shall apply to a Trustee's response to request for designated privileged documents from parties and non-parties as described in Section XI of this Agreement.
Sample 1
Public Review and Comment. The FSP was available for public review and comment from May 7, 2018 to July 6, 2018 at the Xaxli'p Community Forest Corporation office at 0000 Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx. The FSP was also posted to the XCFC web site. One public meeting was held: XCFC hosted an open house at Xaxli’p on MoFLNRO staff provided their comments by telephone conversation and follow up email on . Written comments received during the advertisement period have been considered in the “Submission for Approval”. The written comments, as well as a summary of changes to the draft FSP, are included in Appendix C - “Review and Comment”.
Sample 1
Public Review and Comment. The City of Roanoke shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to seek and consider the views of the public in a manner that reflects the nature and complexity of the undertaking and its effects on historic properties, per the SOP. Upon request, any member of the public can review the complete record of any undertaking. The City will accept written comments from the public on individual undertakings, determinations of eligibility, and the administration of the Agreement. As a part of consultation, the City shall forward copies of public comments to the SHPO and consulting parties. Public comments pertaining to adverse effects shall be governed by Stipulation VI (B). The City shall respond in writing to written comments received, providing copies to the SHPO and consulting parties.
Sample 1

Related to Public Review and Comment

  • Review and Appeal 1. Each Party shall ensure that the importers in its territory have access to administrative review within the customs administration that issued the decision subject to review or, where applicable, the higher authority supervising the administration and/or judicial review of the determination taken at the final level of administrative review, in accordance with the Party's domestic law. 2. The decision on appeal shall be given to the appellant and the reasons for such decision shall be provided in writing. 3. The level of administrative review may include any authority supervising the customs administration of a Party.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • Review and Approval The Supplier confirms and agrees that it shall apply to receive ISR's written consent, wherever ISR's consent, explicitly or implied, is required according to this Agreement. This requirement and the provision of ISR consent, shall not derogate in any way from Supplier's responsibilities and liabilities under this Agreement, and ISR shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever in connection with the review (whether or not there are objections) and/or with any approval given to, or denied from, Supplier, with respect to any matter and/or document, including but without limitation, drawings, designs (at all phases), plans, tests or otherwise.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!