Regional Review Clause Samples

The Regional Review clause establishes a process for evaluating and assessing activities, performance, or compliance within specific geographic areas or regions. Typically, this clause outlines the criteria, frequency, and responsible parties for conducting such reviews, which may include periodic audits, performance assessments, or compliance checks tailored to the unique circumstances of each region. Its core practical function is to ensure that regional operations meet agreed-upon standards and objectives, allowing for targeted oversight and the identification of region-specific issues or improvements.
Regional Review. Regional review of process involving DHB/Blood service employer representatives, union representative and delegates undertaken. 1. Select venue and date. 2. Gather all relevant data required for the meeting. This will include staff submissions, past progression documentation, Contract details, and Staff anniversaries. The Team leaders must have prepared a detailed list of the staff and which staff he or she has identified should be considered for a progression step. 3. An alphabetical list of these staff members is progressed through with the appropriate Section Head supporting either their considered claim for progression or the claim of the staff member is presented or both. Each staff member that is considered is benchmarked against others in a similar role both within their department and in other departments. 4. Once discussion has taken place a decision is made whether the staff member is to go up and by how much. In some cases if the decision is not that clear and perhaps early on in the proceeding then a note may be made to revisit this person at the completion of the scientists. During this process any anomalies or modifications required to the progression documentation are noted so that they can be implemented in the next version of the criteria. 5. Each staff member is discussed as above until the list is complete. 6. Any staff member that the committee was unsure about how to progress will now be reviewed. 7. The Human Resource representative retains a detailed master list of proposed changes. 8. Following completion of the meeting a full list of eligible staff and proposed step changes is prepared and passed on to the appropriate manager for final checking and sign off and then for HR/Payroll to action as appropriate A. Supervision of a Section/Management or a Department
Regional Review. To review and coordinate federal, state, and local programs of regional importance.
Regional Review. Regional review of process involving DHB/Blood service employer representatives, union representative and delegates undertaken. PROGRESSION MEETING FLOW CHART Insert/delete as appropriate Select venue and date. Gather all relevant data required for the meeting. This will include staff submissions, past progression documentation, Contract details, and Staff anniversaries. The Team leaders must have prepared a detailed list of the staff and which staff he or she has identified should be considered for a progression step. An alphabetical list of these staff members is progressed through with the appropriate Section Head supporting either their considered claim for progression or the claim of the staff member is presented or both. Each staff member that is considered is benchmarked against others in a similar role both within their department and in other departments. Once discussion has taken place a decision is made whether the staff member is to go up and by how much. In some cases if the decision is not that clear and perhaps early on in the proceeding then a note may be made to revisit this person at the completion of the scientists. During this process any anomalies or modifications required to the progression documentation are noted so that they can be implemented in the next version of the criteria. Each staff member is discussed as above until the list is complete. Any staff member that the committee was unsure about how to progress will now be reviewed. The Human Resource representative retains a detailed master list of proposed changes. Following completion of the meeting a full list of eligible staff and proposed step changes is prepared and passed on to the appropriate manager for final checking and sign off and then for HR/Payroll to action as appropriate CAREER PROGRESSION - SCIENTISTS
Regional Review. 8.1 This Agreement shall be filed for review with the Southern Maine Regional Planning Commission at least thirty days prior to the date of legislative action by any of the parties. Title 30-A M.R.S.A. § 2342(6).
Regional Review 

Related to Regional Review

  • Annual Reviews Within thirty (30) days after each annual anniversary of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Company shall review Employee’s performance of his duties pursuant to this Agreement and advise Employee of the results of that review. In connection with each such review, the Company shall evaluate whether any increase in Employee’s compensation under Section 2, below, is appropriate.

  • Annual Review The Board of Directors during the Contract Period shall review annually, or at more frequent intervals which the Board of Directors determines is appropriate, the Executive’s compensation and shall award the Executive additional compensation to reflect the Executive’s performance, the performance of the Company and competitive compensation levels, all as determined in the discretion of the Board of Directors.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • External Review In the event of a final internal Adverse Benefit Determination, a Claimant may be entitled to an external review of the Claim. This request must be submitted in writing on an External Review Request form within 120 days of receipt of the Adverse Benefit Determination. The external reviewer will render a recommendation within 45 calendar days unless the request meets expedited criteria, in which case it will be resolved in no later than 72 hours. The external reviewer’s recommendation will be binding. The external reviewer will notify the Claimant of its decision in writing, and the Plan will take action as appropriate to comply with such recommendation. For detailed information about the external review process, please contact ▇▇▇▇▇’s Member Engagement Center.

  • Department Review The parties shall resolve disputes through written submission of their dispute to the Department’s Contract Manager. The Department shall respond to the dispute in writing within ten (10) Business Days from the date that the Department’s Contract Manager receives the dispute. The Department’s decision shall be final unless a party provides the other party with written notice of the party’s disagreement with the decision within ten (10) Business Days from the date of the Department’s decision. If a party disagrees with the Department’s decision, the party may proceed to subsection (b) below.