Remediation Evaluation Sample Clauses

Remediation Evaluation. Remediation Evaluation is a means of providing direct assistance to a non-probationary teacher whose performance is unsatisfactory in areas such as, but not limited to, student control, planning, disregard of District curriculum, and negative interaction with students. The Remediation Evaluation process is intended to provide ways to assist the teacher in overcoming identified deficiencies and returning to a satisfactory performance. If performance is not returned to a satisfactory level during the established time frame, the Superintendent may direct that the process be extended or may recommend to the District's Board of Education that the teacher be dismissed from employment pursuant to the Teacher Employment, Compensation and Dismissal Act of 1990. However, compliance with this Remediation Evaluation process shall not be a condition precedent to commencement of a dismissal action based upon a ground or grounds other than unsatisfactory performance as described above. Before a teacher is placed in the Remediation Evaluation process, the teacher's performance will be identified by the principal as being unsatisfactory through the regular evaluation process and the teacher will have failed to satisfactorily perform a written plan for improvement within the timeline set forth in the plan. Such unsatisfactory performance will be the basis for the Remediation Evaluation process which may follow. The Remediation Evaluation is set forth in the Notebook described in Article 17.3 above.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Remediation Evaluation g. If a department does not provide an eligible Faculty member who holds preferred re-employment status under 13.2.2 (e) with the same or similar Faculty load, the Department Chair shall provide the reasons per Article
Sample 1Sample 2
Remediation Evaluation. A part time Faculty member who receives an overall “needs improvement” review shall be provided by the Peer Review team with recommendations and reasonable assistance for improvement. If the overall rating is “needs improvement,” the Peer Review team will create and forward a remediation plan to the appropriate Xxxx/Area Manager for review and approval. The Peer Review team finalizes the remediation plan and presents the plan to evaluatee. A remediation review to assess the performance of the Faculty member shall be conducted the next time the evaluatee is assigned a class. The remediation review shall be conducted by the same evaluators of the original review and one additional evaluator not on the original team. The additional evaluator will be proposed by the evaluatee with approval by the Xxxx/Area Manager.
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Remediation Evaluation

  • Remediation The Charter School shall provide remediation in required cases pursuant to State Board of Education Rule 160-4-5-.01 and No Child Left Behind, subject to any amendment, waiver or reauthorization thereof

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Focused Evaluation The Focused Evaluation is used when a teacher is not evaluated using the Comprehensive Evaluation process, and will include evaluation of one of the eight state criteria (student growth impact required). If a non-provisional teacher has scored at Proficient or higher the previous year, they may be moved to Focused Evaluation. The teacher may remain on the Focused Evaluation for five (5) years before returning to the Comprehensive Evaluation. The teacher or the evaluator can initiate a move from the Focused to the Comprehensive Evaluation. A decision to move a teacher from a Focused to a Comprehensive Evaluation must occur by December 15.

  • Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Development of a transportation project must comply with applicable environmental laws. The party named in article 1, Responsible Parties, under AGREEMENT is responsible for the following:

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Environmental Remediation Failure to remediate (or pursue the remediation process with due diligence and good faith) within the time period required by law or governmental order, (or within a reasonable time in light of the nature of the problem if no specific time period is so established), environmental problems in violation of Applicable Law related to Properties of the Borrower and/or its Subsidiaries where the estimated cost of remediation is in the aggregate in excess of Seventy-Five Million Dollars ($75,000,000), in each case after all administrative hearings and appeals have been concluded.

  • Remediation Plan If deficiencies or weaknesses are cited on the evaluation form, the evaluator, working with the evaluatee, shall develop a written remediation plan for the purpose of assisting the evaluatee to improve. The remedial action plan shall be attached to the evaluation document and shall contain:

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.