Plan for Improvement. A. When an evaluation score classifies a certificated teacher as ineffective (or developing or lower for two consecutive evaluation periods), the teacher must be placed on a Plan for Improvement and a written preliminary notice of inadequacy of classroom performance shall be issued to the teacher unless the teacher meets the criteria for an exception as set forth in Governing Board Policy GCO.
Plan for Improvement. An evaluation report shall be issued upon the completion of an evaluation and shall:
Plan for Improvement. An employee deemed to have serious deficiencies in his or her performance may be placed on a Plan for Improvement (Plan) at any time during the work year. Plans for Improvement are serious documents that constitute a declaration that unless sufficient improvement in performance is observed within the plan period, loss of employment may result. Employees may request AEIOU representation. A Plan shall be effective not less than sixty (60) calendar days and for not more than six (6) months. A Plan shall contain, at a minimum, the following:
Plan for Improvement. Concerns may be addressed with a written plan for improvement that indicates reasonable correction measures, expectations, duration of the plan, reasonable measures of attainment and administrative assistance that will be provided. Unsatisfactory expectations not noted in the employee’s subsequent evaluations shall mean the expectations have been met.
Plan for Improvement. Employees that receive a Verbal, Written or Final Written Warning will discuss a plan for improvement with their immediate supervisor. The employee and the immediate supervisor will meet at least one (1) additional time to discuss progress. The employee may have Association representation at follow-up meetings.
Plan for Improvement. On receipt of a notice of unsatisfactory performance, a Contractor is required to submit, to the notifying Contracting Body or other I-Flair Members who have issued similar secondary notice, as well as a copy provided to the Framework Administrator, a plan for improvement, which sets out the steps that the Contractor is committed to implement in any future Call-Off Contracts, in order to ensure that improved and satisfactory performance will be delivered in respect of any / all future Call-Off Contracts. Failure by the Contractor to provide such plan for improved performance within two calendar months, will result in the suspension applying, becoming permanent, for the Term of the Framework Agreement. On receipt from the Contractor of any such plan for improvement, the notifying Contracting Body, and other I-Flair Members who have issued secondary notice, must give reasonable consideration to the Contractor‟s planned improvements. Such notifying Contracting Body is entitled (but not required) to consult with any other I-Flair Members which have issued similar secondary notice based on the same evidenced unacceptable performance, in order to arrive at a collective view. Each notifying Contracting Body or I-Flair Member, having received a plan for improved performance from a suspended Contractor, is required to provide a formal response to the Contractor within two calendar months of receipt of the Contractor‟s plan for improvement, such response to be copied to the Framework Administrator. Failure, on the part of the Contracting Body to respond within this period, will result in the lifting of the Contractor‟s suspension, by default. Each notifying Contracting Body, acting independently or collaboratively, may, at its sole discretion, determine whether the Contractor‟s plan for improvement provides sufficient reassurance, so as to enable the suspension to be lifted. Where a Contractor‟s plan for improvement is accepted by a notifying Contracting Body or other I- Flair Members who have issued secondary notice, then that Contracting Body / I-Flair Member must issue a further notice (within 2 calendar months) to the Contractor, confirming the acceptance of the plan for improvement and confirming the removal of the suspension. Such notice to be copied to all other I-Flair Members and to the Framework Administrator. Where a Contractor‟s plan for improvement is considered by a notifying Contracting Body or other I- Flair Members who have issued secondary notice, ...
Plan for Improvement. If adequate progress has not been made after a reasonable time following being informed of the nature of the deficiencies, the supervisor may place the administrator on a written Plan for Improvement (Plan) regardless of whether the evaluation has been completed. The Plan shall be based on evidence of performance deficiency (ies) in one or more ISLLC standards as outlined in the administrator’s current evaluation instrument. The Plan shall be in writing and designed to instruct and guide the administrator so that the deficiency (ies) can be rectified. The Plan for Improvement will provide clear direction for the administrator and also provide evidence of support in order to assist the administrator. The supervisor shall meet with the administrator regularly, preferably once a month, at the administrator’s site, to review progress on the Plan. If adequate progress has been made on the Plan, the administrator will be removed from the Plan. If, after a minimum of forty-five (45) instructional days, the administrator has not made adequate progress on the Plan, the supervisor has the option of extending the Plan, or recommending non- renewal of the employment contract. Non-Renewal or Dismissal for Performance Deficiencies Non-renewal or dismissal of an administrator shall be in accordance with state and federal statute. Additionally, non-renewal or dismissal of an administrator for performance deficiencies pursuant to the performance evaluation procedure set forth in this regulation will also include the opportunity for the Administrator to receive the performance improvement conversations set forth above and a formal Plan for Improvement before an administrator's contract can be non-renewed pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-503 for performance deficiencies except in the following cases:
Plan for Improvement. 7.4.3. The Contractor shall incorporate the results of Grievances and Fair Hearings into its quality management plan and address any trends in a quality improvement plan.
Plan for Improvement. 1. If the immediate supervisor determines certain practices carried out by the teacher in the classroom do not meet the criteria and one (1) or more criteria is marked NS, the immediate supervisor shall provide a written explanation of the specific criteria in need of improvement. The immediate supervisor shall develop a plan for improvement to be implemented by the teacher. The teacher shall have the opportunity to provide input into the plan. The purpose of a plan for improvement is to assist a teacher in correcting poor performance or conduct identified by the immediate supervisor and marked as not satisfactory and should be designed to provide a structure for improvement. In developing a plan for improvement, the immediate supervisor shall establish a reasonable time for improvement, not to exceed two months, taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the teacher’s performance or conduct. The immediate supervisor shall make a reasonable effort to assist the teacher in correcting the poor performance or conduct. The immediate supervisor shall provide ongoing feedback to the teacher. The teacher is responsible for correcting the less than satisfactory performance. (6/14/10)
Plan for Improvement. 8.1 If a Plan for Improvement is recommended by the evaluator, such plan shall be developed by the evaluator and the teacher within ten (10) working days, if it is not developed at the time of the Evaluation Conference.
