Research Recommendations Sample Clauses

Research Recommendations. F.5.1. Receipt: ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ may from time to time provide research reports and recommendations to the Client, but is under no obligation to do so. Where ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ does provide such research reports and recommendations, the Client acknowledges that it may not receive them at the same time as other customers of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Research Recommendations. This three-phase study concluded that: • WB-67 was the most common heavy truck observed and its use as a design vehicle is warranted. • Generating heavy truck fleets by location produces the best model in VISSIM. • If time and resources permit, the Priority rule is the preferred method for gap acceptance modeling in VISSIM. • Critical gaps of 5.4s - 6.4s should be considered when modeling heavy trucks in simulation. • Modifying the geometry of roundabouts can lead to enhancements for heavy trucks. However, project context should be the primary consideration. • Roundabout metering affects heavy truck speed, metering devices are most influential if placed 115 to 230-ft in advance of the yield markings.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Research Recommendations. These recommendations must include a discussion of topics for future study, including an indication of why the author thinks they are relevant to park management and reference to any known sources that might be useful for this future research.
View Source
Research Recommendations. Further longitudinal research into the synergistic effects of climate and sedentarization is necessary to map out impacts on livelihood assets in greater detail in order to identify additional intervention points. One specific area the provides rich potential for study is the exploration of gender impacts of these co-occurring transitions. Previous research indicates the impacts of climate change on food security are highly specific to gender and that pre-existing social stratifications have the potential to be worsened due to the impacts of climate change (▇▇▇▇▇▇, et al., 2015; ▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 2014). Better understanding of gendered burdens will ensure that the interventions designed to address livelihood challenges take into account the unique needs of women and girls. Previous research done by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al propose effects on pathogens, hosts, vectors, and infectious disease epidemiology itself due to changing climates (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., 2009). However, disease dynamics are highly complex with many interrelated anthropogenic and natural elements. Thus, it has been hard to predict the location and timing of these anticipated outbreaks, making their prevention increasingly challenging. These challenges highlight the need for increased animal disease surveillance systems in areas with significant vector-borne diseases. Moving forward, further research into developing surveillance systems to protect cattle health will prove essential for protecting this valuable resource which is intimately linked with many of the elements needed for sustainable livelihoods. ▇▇▇▇▇, A., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, M. (1996). Pastoralist life-styles and development paradigms: The contradictions and conflict (Rep.). Nairobi. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇, T., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2012). Climate change, violent conflict and local institutions in Kenya’s drylands. Journal of Peace Research, 49(1), 65-80. doi:10.1177/0022343311427344 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, R., ▇▇▇▇▇, R., ▇▇▇▇▇▇, M., ▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2005). The use of community-based animal health workers to strengthen disease surveillance systems in Tanzania. Revue Scientifique Et Technique De ▇▇▇▇, 24(3), 921-932. doi:10.20506/rst.24.3.1620 ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (1999). Toward a virtuous circle. Health, Nutrition, and Population. doi:10.1596/0- 8213-4557-5 ▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2012). Is Proactive Adaptation to Climate Change Necessary in Grazed Rangelands? Rangeland Ecology & Management, 65(6), 563-568. doi:10.2111/rem-d-1...
View Source

Related to Research Recommendations

  • Company Board Recommendation (a) Subject to the terms of Section 6.3(b) and Section 6.3(c), the Company Board shall recommend that the holders of Company Shares accept the Offer, tender their Company Shares to Acquisition Sub pursuant to the Offer and, if required by the applicable provisions of Delaware Law, adopt this Agreement (the “Company Board Recommendation”). (b) Neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) fail to make the Company Board Recommendation to the holders of the Company Shares, (ii) withhold, withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent, or publicly propose to withhold, withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent, the Company Board Recommendation, (iii) adopt, approve, recommend, endorse or otherwise declare advisable the adoption of any Acquisition Proposal (it being understood that, only with respect to a tender offer or exchange offer, taking a neutral position or no position (other than in a communication made in compliance with Rule 14d-9(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal shall be considered a breach of this clause (iii)), or (iv) resolve, agree or publicly propose to take any such actions (each such foregoing action or failure to act in clauses (i) through (iv) being referred to herein as an “Company Board Recommendation Change”). Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, if, at any time prior to the Appointment Time, the Company Board receives a Superior Proposal or there occurs an Intervening Event, the Company Board may effect a Company Board Recommendation Change provided that (i) the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that the failure to effect a Company Board Recommendation Change would reasonably be expected to be a breach of its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law, and in the case of a Superior Proposal, the Company Board approves or recommends such Superior Proposal; (ii) the Company has notified Parent in writing that it intends to effect a Company Board Recommendation Change, describing in reasonable detail the reasons, including the material terms and conditions of any such Superior Proposal and a copy of the final form of any related agreements or a description in reasonable detail of such Intervening Event, as the case may be, for such Company Board Recommendation Change (a “Recommendation Change Notice”) (it being understood that the Recommendation Change Notice shall not constitute a Company Board Recommendation Change for purposes of this Agreement); (iii) if requested by Parent, the Company shall have made its Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith with Parent’s Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the three (3) Business Day period following delivery by the Company to Parent of such Recommendation Change Notice; and (iv) if Parent shall have delivered to the Company a written proposal capable of being accepted by the Company to alter the terms or conditions of this Agreement during such three (3) Business Day period, the Company Board shall have determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel), after considering the terms of such proposal by Parent, that a Company Board Recommendation Change is still necessary in light of such Superior Proposal or Intervening Event in order to comply with its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law. Any material amendment or modification to any Superior Proposal will be deemed to be a new Superior Proposal for purposes of this Section 6.3. The Company shall keep confidential any proposals made by Parent to revise the terms of this Agreement, other than in the event of any amendment to this Agreement and to the extent required to be disclosed in any Company SEC Reports. (c) Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit the Company Board from (i) taking and disclosing to the Company Stockholders a position contemplated by Rule 14e-2(a) under the Exchange Act or complying with the provisions of Rule 14d-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and (ii) making any disclosure to the Company Stockholders that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that the failure to make such disclosure would reasonably be expected to be a breach of its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law; provided, however, that in no event shall this Section 6.3(c) affect the obligations of the Company set forth in Sections 6.2 and 6.3; and provided, further, that any such disclosure will be deemed to be a Company Board Recommendation Change unless the Board of Directors publicly reaffirms the Company Board Recommendation within five Business Days of such disclosure.

  • Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our country-by-country analysis, 197 of the AEWA populations are already well-monitored both for population size and trend. Our prioritisation method allowed focusing on the AEWA conservation and management priorities (Priorities 1-2) and to consider cost effectiveness and feasibility (Priorities 3-6). Theoretically, the two- third target of the AEWA Strategic Plan can be just attained by focusing on the development of monitoring activities for Priority 1-5 populations (i.e. leaving out the 168 more widespread Priority 6 populations that would require more species-specific monitoring methods. Most of the Priority 1-5 populations would require improvement of the IWC though regional schemes focusing on the West Asian / East African flyway with possibly three subregional components in the Central Asia, Arabia and Eastern and Southern Africa. In the latter region, improvements in Tanzania and Mozambique are particularly important. In the Black Sea - Mediterranean - Sahelian flyway the focus should be primarily on the Sahel countries and especially on increasing the consistency of annual counts. The quality of monitoring is already better in the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. In the East Atlantic, the ongoing capacity-building activities should continue and the consistency and representativity of site coverage should be further strengthened in most countries. Angola would require a major capacity improvement but primarily for the intra-African migrants on inland wetlands. It is also clear that the targets of the AEWA Strategic Plan cannot be achieved without complementing the IWC with periodic aerial surveys both in Western Africa as well as in Eastern and Southern Africa, by setting up a periodic offshore waterbird monitoring scheme in the Caspian Sea and by focusing in each country on a relatively small number of breeding bird species strategically selected in this report.

  • Board Recommendation The Acquiror Company Board, by unanimous written consent, has determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Acquiror Company’s stockholders and has duly authorized this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION 2. Staff conducted an investigation of the Respondent’s activities. The investigation disclosed that the Respondent had engaged in activity for which the Respondent could be penalized on the exercise of the discretion of the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1 of By-law No. 1. 3. Staff and the Respondent recommend settlement of the matters disclosed by the investigation in accordance with the terms and conditions set out below. The Respondent agrees to the settlement on the basis of the facts set out in Part IV herein and consents to the making of an Order in the form attached as Schedule “A”. 4. Staff and the Respondent agree that the terms of this Settlement Agreement, including the attached Schedule “A”, will be released to the public only if and when the Settlement Agreement is accepted by the Hearing Panel.

  • SUPPLIER PUBLICATIONS Any marketing materials in relation to this Framework Agreement that that Supplier produces must comply in all respects with the Branding Guidance. The Supplier will periodically update and revise such marketing materials.