Results of Assessment. (a) In performance assessment under Article 19A.01, if the Contract Academic Instructor Assessment Committee finds the teaching performance of the Contract Academic Instructor in a course satisfactory, the Contract Academic Instructor shall be eligible to exercise a Right of First Refusal for the course.
Results of Assessment. In recognition of the unique government-to-government relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, FHWA shall take the lead in identifying and establishing consultation with the Indian tribes and Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPO) consistent with 36 CFR § 800.3(c) - (f). If the tribe is agreeable, further consultation may be conducted among the tribe and INDOT.
Results of Assessment. (a) In performance assessment under Article 19B.01, if the Library Assessment Committee finds the professional performance of the Contract Academic Librarian in an assignment satisfactory, the Contract Academic Librarian shall be eligible to exercise a Right of First Refusal for the assignment.
Results of Assessment. (a) In performance assessment under Article 19A.01, if the CAIAC finds the teaching performance of the CAI in a course satisfactory, the CAI shall be eligible to exercise a Right of First Refusal for the course.
Results of Assessment. The full results of the assessment are provided in Appendix One of this document but a summary of the results for each of the delivery Vehicle Options is given below Lead Council Option A lead Council option was ruled out because: • Weak binding commitment between Councils • Non-lead Council Councils have limited strategic control or influence over the lead Council • Difficult to create empowered Shared Service management team with right skills mix • Difficult to create the right Shared Service culture, performance management and incentive arrangements • Lead Council carries significant (operational and reputational) risk Joint Board Option A joint board option was ruled out because: • Statutory nature of board provides very little flexibility for change (during period when change in Public Sector is likely to be significant) • Scottish Government would have significant influence on plans and timing • Extended timescales (12-24months) to set up and change • Expansion options severely constrained Public:Public v Public:Private The assessment between the Public:Public and Public:Private option was relatively finely balanced and it was considered that both would provide an effective option for implementation of the CVSSS. On balance however it was concluded that the Public:Public option was the most pragmatic choice on the basis that it would be: • much quicker to set up and create early momentum and savings • more flexible for adaptable within a changing Public Sector environment • able to contract with Private Sector to bring in necessary skills and expertise • more attractive for staff and trade unions Detailed governance arrangements will require to be developed on the basis of the guiding principles set out in section 3.3. These arrangements will ensure that the Public:Public vehicle has: • democratic oversight and governance; • the required level of operational management autonomy and responsibility; • targets set for the delivery of minimum levels of savings to an agreed timescale.
Results of Assessment i) The Assessment Body shall collect the results of the assessment along with the original assessment sheet (physically and electronically) from the respective Assessors after taking their due signatures and comments. These result sheets as specified to reach SSC within 7 (seven) working days after the completion of the assessment.
Results of Assessment. 5.4.1 Individual Assessment Reports will not be disclosed publicly.
