Results of Assessment Sample Clauses

Results of Assessment. (a) In performance assessment under Article 19A.01, if the Contract Academic Instructor Assessment Committee finds the teaching performance of the Contract Academic Instructor in a course satisfactory, the Contract Academic Instructor shall be eligible to exercise a Right of First Refusal for the course.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Results of Assessment. In recognition of the unique government-to-government relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, FHWA shall take the lead in identifying and establishing consultation with the Indian tribes and Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPO) consistent with 36 CFR § 800.3(c) - (f). If the tribe is agreeable, further consultation may be conducted among the tribe and INDOT.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Results of Assessment. (a) In performance assessment under Article 19B.01, if the Library Assessment Committee finds the professional performance of the Contract Academic Librarian in an assignment satisfactory, the Contract Academic Librarian shall be eligible to exercise a Right of First Refusal for the assignment.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Results of Assessment. (a) In performance assessment under Article 19A.01, if the CAIAC finds the teaching performance of the CAI in a course satisfactory, the CAI shall be eligible to exercise a Right of First Refusal for the course.
Sample 1
Results of Assessment. The full results of the assessment are provided in Appendix One of this document but a summary of the results for each of the delivery Vehicle Options is given below Lead Council Option A lead Council option was ruled out because: • Weak binding commitment between Councils • Non-lead Council Councils have limited strategic control or influence over the lead Council • Difficult to create empowered Shared Service management team with right skills mix • Difficult to create the right Shared Service culture, performance management and incentive arrangements • Lead Council carries significant (operational and reputational) risk Joint Board Option A joint board option was ruled out because: • Statutory nature of board provides very little flexibility for change (during period when change in Public Sector is likely to be significant) • Scottish Government would have significant influence on plans and timing • Extended timescales (12-24months) to set up and change • Expansion options severely constrained Public:Public v Public:Private The assessment between the Public:Public and Public:Private option was relatively finely balanced and it was considered that both would provide an effective option for implementation of the CVSSS. On balance however it was concluded that the Public:Public option was the most pragmatic choice on the basis that it would be: • much quicker to set up and create early momentum and savings • more flexible for adaptable within a changing Public Sector environment • able to contract with Private Sector to bring in necessary skills and expertise • more attractive for staff and trade unions Detailed governance arrangements will require to be developed on the basis of the guiding principles set out in section 3.3. These arrangements will ensure that the Public:Public vehicle has: • democratic oversight and governance; • the required level of operational management autonomy and responsibility; • targets set for the delivery of minimum levels of savings to an agreed timescale.
Sample 1
Results of Assessment i) The Assessment Body shall collect the results of the assessment along with the original assessment sheet (physically and electronically) from the respective Assessors after taking their due signatures and comments. These result sheets as specified to reach SSC within 7 (seven) working days after the completion of the assessment.
Sample 1
Results of Assessment. 5.4.1 Individual Assessment Reports will not be disclosed publicly.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Results of Assessment

  • Audit Results If an audit by a Party determines that an overpayment or an underpayment has occurred, a notice of such overpayment or underpayment shall be given to the other Party together with those records from the audit which support such determination.

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

  • Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1607, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C (Post-9/11 GI Xxxx). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guard, reservist, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1., 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last twenty-two years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer based system of record. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically are minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in a VA estimated annual savings of $26,724,091 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $12,350,000. A cost-benefit analysis is at Attachment 1. In the 32 years since the inception of the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these educational assistance programs have remained significant. The implementation of Chapter 33 has impacted the Chapter 30 program over the past 8 years (fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2017). Statistics show a decrease of 23 percent in the number of persons who ultimately use Chapter 30 from fiscal year 2015 to 2016. The number of persons who use Chapter 33 has consistently been above 700,000 in the past four years. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the number of persons eligible for the education programs.‌

  • Financial Condition There shall have been no material adverse change, as determined by Bank, in the financial condition or business of Borrower, nor any material decline, as determined by Bank, in the market value of any collateral required hereunder or a substantial or material portion of the assets of Borrower.

  • SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The interim financial statements are prepared by using the same accounting policies and methods of computation as were used for the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, except the changes in accounting policies as follows.

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • FINANCIAL STATUS REPORTS (FSRS Except as otherwise provided, for contracts with categorical budgets, Grantee shall submit quarterly FSRs to System Agency by the last business day of the month following the end of each quarter for System Agency review and financial assessment. Grantee shall submit the final FSR no later than forty-five (45) calendar days following the end of the applicable term.

  • Narrative Results i. A description of Xxxxxxx’x billing and coding system(s), including the identification, by position description, of the personnel involved in coding and billing.

  • Reports of Accidents Within 24 hours after Engineer becomes aware of the occurrence of any accident or other event which results in, or might result in, injury to the person or property of any third person (other than an employee of the Engineer), whether or not it results from or involves any action or failure to act by the Engineer or any employee or agent of the Engineer and which arises in any manner from the performance of this Contract, the Engineer shall send a written report of such accident or other event to the County, setting forth a full and concise statement of the facts pertaining thereto. The Engineer shall also immediately send the County a copy of any summons, subpoena, notice, or other documents served upon the Engineer, its agents, employees, or representatives, or received by it or them, in connection with any matter before any court arising in any manner from the Engineer’s performance of work under this Contract.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.