Reviewers Sample Clauses

Reviewers. D1 The Council shall, for the purposes of peer review, appoint such number of Reviewers as may be agreed from time to time between the Council, the Scottish Legal Aid Board and the Scottish Government D2 The recruitment and re-appointment process will follow the procedure to be agreed by the Committee. Recruitment and re-appointment panels will include a member of each of the three representative constituencies of the Committee. D3 Each Reviewer shall be a solicitor and shall undertake the initial and ongoing training prescribed by the Committee. D4 The terms and conditions of appointment of Reviewers will be as agreed from time to time between the Council, the Board and the Scottish Government. D5 The Council will publish a list of Reviewers and keep this updated.

Reviewers. Noora Yli-Huumo Xxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxx APPENDIX 1 Salary Settlement

Reviewers. Reviewers must have an approved account before they can review the documentation submitted by a Gold Standard project activity.

Reviewers. To expedite the review process, authors must recommend four potential reviewers, with a PhD degree, and experts in the topic, who are not members of their institution(s) and have published at least one article in the last two years. Two of the proposed reviewers must be from a different country from the principal author´s country.

Reviewers. 35 Each Appraiser and Appraisal Reviewer must be certified by the Arizona Board of Appraisers as

Reviewers. This document has been reviewed by the following:

Reviewers. This document has been reviewed by the following: Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Information Governance Consultant, NHS Arden and GEM CSU Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Head of Information Governance Service, NHS Arden and GEM CSU Xxxx Xxxxxx, Head of Data, Development and Integration, NHS Arden and GEM CSU Xxxx Xxxxxxx, Director of Information and It Services, NHS Arden and GEM CSU Xxxx Xxxxxx, Strategy and Planning Officer, NHS Leicester City CCG LLR IM&T Project Board on 12/03/2015 Xxxxxx X’Xxxxx, Caldicott Guardian, NHS East Leicestershire and Rutland, CCG Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, Caldicott Guardian, NHS West Leicestershire CCG Xxxx Xxxxx, Caldicott Guardian, NHS Leicester City CCG Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Local Medical Committee on 10/06/2015 1Personal Confidential Data (PCD) - As per Caldicott 2, ‘Personal’ includes the Data Protection Act definition of personal data, plus data relating to the deceased. ‘Confidential’ includes both information ‘given in confidence’ and ‘that which is owed a duty of confidence’ and is adapted to include ‘sensitive’ as defined in the Data Protection Act.

Reviewers. Xxxxx Xxxxx, Utah Water Resources; Xxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxx, Xxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, CWCB; Xxx Xxxxxx, Environmental Representative, Recovery Implementation Committee; Xxx Xxxxx, Water Users Representative; Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx, The Nature Conservancy; Xxx Xxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxx, Recovery Program

Reviewers. As Reviewer, you are responsible for: a) undertaking the appropriate SRDS training prior to holding any review meetings. b) ensuring you are fully briefed on departmental and relevant University objectives and priorities so that any discussions with reviewees are set in that context. c) making arrangements for the review meeting (giving at least two weeks notice). You should take care to ensure that the location for the meeting is appropriate and free from interruptions. You should allow at least one hour for the meeting. d) considering the reviewee’s self-review (which should be submitted to you at least one week prior to the meeting). e) ensuring the meeting is open, supportive and constructive, and that all issues raised by the reviewee prior to and during the meeting are discussed. You should ensure that any individual objectives agreed with the reviewee, and that any identified development needs, are in line with departmental priorities and objectives. When conducting the meeting you should also seek to be open-minded, encouraging and positive; ask open-ended questions in order to allow the reviewee to express themselves fully; recognise achievements and offer feedback on the reviewee’s contribution; seek to address concerns or problems in a constructive way. f) ensuring that all the forms are completed, signed and submitted to the Head of Department, within two weeks of the meeting. g) ensuring feedback is provided to the reviewee as appropriate, i.e. on decisions relating to development needs (see Section C.2) and/or on recommendations from the Departmental Review Panel (see Section 5). h) ensuring that you follow up any agreed action points within the agreed timescale; if this cannot be done, you should inform the reviewee and/or the Head of Department as appropriate.

Reviewers. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, CO Xxxx XxXxxx, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL XI. References Xxxxxxx, X.X. and X.X. Xxxxx. 2000. Response of the Green River fish community to construction and re- regulation of Flaming Forge Dam, 1962–1996. Final Report of Colorado State University Larval Fish Laboratory to Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program, Denver, Colorado