Reviewers. D1 The Council shall, for the purposes of peer review, appoint such number of Reviewers as may be agreed from time to time between the Council, the Scottish Legal Aid Board and the Scottish Government D2 The recruitment and re-appointment process will follow the procedure to be agreed by the Committee. Recruitment and re-appointment panels will include a member of each of the three representative constituencies of the Committee. D3 Each Reviewer shall be a solicitor and shall undertake the initial and ongoing training prescribed by the Committee. D4 The terms and conditions of appointment of Reviewers will be as agreed from time to time between the Council, the Board and the Scottish Government. D5 The Council will publish a list of Reviewers and keep this updated.
Reviewers. Noora Yli-Huumo Xxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxx APPENDIX 1 Salary Settlement
Reviewers. 35 Each Appraiser and Appraisal Reviewer must be certified by the Arizona Board of Appraisers as
Reviewers. 8.1. This clause 8 applies where Reviewer Administration Services are included in the list at Page 1 of this Agreement.
8.2. Where the Supplier is requested to provide Reviewer Administration Services, the Supplier will provide ACC with a list of individuals who have indicated to the Supplier their interest in acting as Reviewers. ACC will provide a Letter of Engagement to each Reviewer acceptable to it. The Letter of Engagement will set out that ACC engages the Reviewer to undertake Review Services in accordance with Part 5 of the AC Act until the Reviewer indicates otherwise to the Supplier (the Supplier will then notify the same to ACC).
8.3. The Supplier shall ensure that Reviewer Services are provided only by the Reviewers who have received and agreed to a current Letter of Engagement with ACC.
8.4. The Supplier may, at any time during the Term, notify ACC of the names of additional individuals who have indicated to the Supplier their interest in providing Review Services. ACC will arrange a Letter of Engagement to be provided to each of the additional individuals.
Reviewers. As Reviewer, you are responsible for:
a) undertaking the appropriate SRDS training prior to holding any review meetings.
b) ensuring you are fully briefed on departmental and relevant University objectives and priorities so that any discussions with reviewees are set in that context.
c) making arrangements for the review meeting (giving at least two weeks notice). You should take care to ensure that the location for the meeting is appropriate and free from interruptions. You should allow at least one hour for the meeting.
d) considering the reviewee’s self-review (which should be submitted to you at least one week prior to the meeting).
e) ensuring the meeting is open, supportive and constructive, and that all issues raised by the reviewee prior to and during the meeting are discussed. You should ensure that any individual objectives agreed with the reviewee, and that any identified development needs, are in line with departmental priorities and objectives. When conducting the meeting you should also seek to be open-minded, encouraging and positive; ask open-ended questions in order to allow the reviewee to express themselves fully; recognise achievements and offer feedback on the reviewee’s contribution; seek to address concerns or problems in a constructive way.
f) ensuring that all the forms are completed, signed and submitted to the Head of Department, within two weeks of the meeting.
g) ensuring feedback is provided to the reviewee as appropriate, i.e. on decisions relating to development needs (see Section C.2) and/or on recommendations from the Departmental Review Panel (see Section 5).
h) ensuring that you follow up any agreed action points within the agreed timescale; if this cannot be done, you should inform the reviewee and/or the Head of Department as appropriate.
Reviewers. As requested by MCC in writing from time to time, LEC will also engage an independent Reviewer. LEC will select the Reviewer(s) in accordance with the Mt. Coffee M&E Framework. LEC will enter into an agreement with each Reviewer, in form and substance acceptable to MCC, that sets forth the roles and responsibilities of the Reviewer with respect to the review or evaluation, including access rights, required form and content of the applicable review or evaluation and other appropriate terms and conditions (the “Mt. Coffee Reviewer Agreement”).
Reviewers. As used in this Agreement, the term “Reviewers” refers collectively and individually to Contractor and Subcontractor, including their employees, subcontractors and agents who are contracted to perform services for the Secretary’s Risk Assessment Study. No Reviewer currently employed by a Vendor or a business competitor of a Vendor shall have access to the Confidential Information.
Reviewers. Each Reviewer shall be remunerated by the Society at a rate agreed from time to time between the Council and the Board.
Reviewers. Faculty who serve as reviewers shall receive a stipend of $300 upon 15 completion of the review process and submittal of the completed review summary to 16 the Vice President of Instruction. A faculty member will not serve on more than two 17 (2) review committees each academic year. 19 SECTION J GENERAL PROVISIONS
21 1. The provisions of this article are exempt from the grievance procedure outlined 22 elsewhere in this contract.
