Scenario B. Fast fluid transport
Scenario B. Scenario B was similar to the first one, but aiming at testing the availability and functionality of an alignment service, and a workflow usage within Taverna. Here, the validator got more difficulties, although the scenario is validated. Only one criterion (Req-TEC- 0106 – Format compliance) is reported as not fulfilled, contrary to the developer who had no problems. The external validator gives a few comments. More than one aligner is available through the registry and it was not clear which one to be selected. Moreover, although some documentation is available through Spinet, the documentation in Taverna was not sufficient enough to be able to use the service in a workflow. The validator had to look for information on the Internet, then chose to use the bsa aligner although it is not listed as a PANACEA tool in the catalogue, but was nevertheless integrated. Using the Spinet interface, bsa run correctly (although, from time to time, bsa failed without returning any error through the Spinet), but the final output was not PANACEA compliant.
Scenario B. Holiday: Friday = Observed, Saturday = Actual (non-premium) Schedule: Monday through Friday Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Straight Pay 8 8 8 8 Overtime Pay 8 (4 hrs) 1.5 x Pay* 8 (12 hrs) 8 (12 hrs) Holiday Pay 8
Scenario B. You have been assigned to a mentor who is of a race different from you. You find yourself uncomfortable and sense that your mentor is also feeling awkward. Your mentor does share his/her experiences and strategies on how to approach issues so that you do feel you are gaining something from this relationship. However, you frequently disagree with some of his/her suggested approaches and you find yourself increasingly frustrated. You believe the issue to be that your mentor has a problem with talking about your ethnic/racial background. • Will you address the issue or let it go? If you let it go, what will you do instead? • Is there anything you could have done early on to avoid this situation? • What concerns do you have about being mentored by someone of a different Race/culture or gender? • Are the concerns the same for each one of you? You and your mentor have been communicating frequently and enjoying the naturalness of the relationship and you both have great chemistry together. You have agreed to meet during the day but early on your mentor calls and informs you that s/he is unable to meet as scheduled but suggests meeting after work at a local restaurant. You meet and your conversation goes well, as usual and the atmosphere is relaxed. At some point in the conversation, your mentor talks about how much s/he enjoys this relationship but s/he does so in a way that leads you to think that his/her interest in you is becoming more personal than professional. • What are you going to do? • How will this affect your relationship from this point? • How will you handle this if both of you are single? • How would you react if the mentor reveals that s/he is gay/lesbian? • Are there circumstances when you feel that a mentor and mentoree can pursue a more intimate relationship without it affecting their mentoring?
Scenario B. Within the scope of this SOW, it is the understanding of the parties that Customer’s influence over the determination of the means and purposes of processing of Dataset Personal Data qualifies it as a data controller in respect of such processing. The provisions in Appendix 2 shall apply to such processing. SCENARIO C: Within the scope of this SOW, it is the understanding of the parties that Customer’s influence over the determination of the means and purposes of processing of Dataset Personal Data qualifies it as a data controller in respect of such processing. The provisions in Appendix 2 shall apply to such processing. By selecting the appropriate Scenario, the data protection terms that apply is determined in relation to personal data that is not business contact data of the parties. See the description of the Scenarios on page 2 above for further details. Additional terms (if any) (See MSA Guidance Notes) [insert details of any additional terms that apply (if any)]
Scenario B. Roma model
Scenario B. Within the scope of this SOW, it is the understanding of the parties that Customer’s influence over the determination of the means and purposes of processing of Dataset Personal Data qualifies it as a data controller in respect of such processing. The provisions in Appendix 2 shall apply to such processing. SCENARIO C: Within the scope of this SOW, it is the understanding of the parties that Customer’s influence over the determination of the means and purposes of processing of Dataset Personal Data qualifies it as a data controller in respect of such processing. The provisions in Appendix 2 shall apply to such processing. Additional terms (if any) (See MSA Guidance Notes) [insert details of any additional terms that apply (if any)] By signing below, each party confirms that it has read and understood the terms of this SOW and agrees to be bound by such terms from the SOW Commencement Date.
Scenario B. Clinical data and images were previously collected in different research projects and are used in the neuGRID e-infrastructure, with two different possibilities:
1. the data are collected in neuGRID
2. the data are used, but not collected, in neuGRID In this scenario, informed consent and anonymization issues have already been handled in some way in the original research protocols.
Scenario B. 1
i) previous research protocol gives the possibility that data collected be included in other datasets/neuGRID;
ii) previous research protocol rules out the possibility that data collected be included in other datasets/neuGRID;
iii) previous research protocol does not take into account the possibility that data collected be included in other datasets/neuGRID In case i) the collection of the data in neuGRID is possible In case ii) the collection of data in neuGRID is not possible In case iii) the collection of data in neuGRID is possible under some conditions.
