Security Threats. QSR reserves the right, in its sole and complete discretion, to suspend Client’s Account and access by Client to the Services without notice if Client's Account is (as determined in the sole discretion of QSR) directly or indirectly involved in creating a security threat, including without limitation a denial of service attack. QSR may reinstate Client’s Account, at QSR’s sole discretion and without any refund of Subscription Fees or other costs, upon resolution of the security threat.
Security Threats. In the event of a terrorist or other security threat, Contractor agrees to follow the procedures set forth below such an event occur in, on or around the Jobsite and Project. In the event of an emergency in, on or around the Jobsite or Project, the Contractor, its employees and all of the Sub-contractors and their respective employees shall communicate with the Owner’s Representative and shall take direction from the Owner’s Representative in addressing any security threat identified, through resolution of the threat. The Contractor shall take all measures needed to secure the Jobsite and Project against any such threats. The Contractor shall assist the Owner’s Representative and any other of Owner’s employees located at the Jobsite or Project, if requested to do so in addressing the security threat. When Contractor or any of its agents or Subcontractors are working in, on or around the Jobsite and/or Project and a potential or actual security threat has been identified, the Contractor and all of its employees, Subcontractors, and all of their respective employees shall follow the guidance of the Owner’s Reprehensive or Owner’s other representatives located in, on or around the Jobsite or Project. The Owner’s employees have been provided with specific policies, procedures and directions designed to address such situations. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to inform its employees, and its Subcontractors of the requirement to contact Owner’s Representative in order to properly address security threats to the Jobsite and Project.
Security Threats. Many of the South Asian states are witnessing conflicts in which ideological, ethnic, communal and political issues are intertwined. In recent years, 75 percent of terrorism related casualties in the world occurred in South Asia. The worst part is that the increasing transnational coordination of the terrorists, insurgents and radical groups has added a critical dimension to the security of nations. These linkages across the border support, encourage, train, arm and often direct terrorists and insurgent groups for their own ends.31 Proxy wars have, consequently, thrown up a number of challenges before the border security agencies. Transgressions along the border were, in the past, often localised in nature and had no major security implications. Now, the pattern of border crimes has changed. The intricate relationship among narcotics smuggling, International Financial Corporation (IFC) rackets, small arms proliferation and terrorist activities now have far-reaching implications for internal security.32 The fanatic religious ideologies help to xxxxxx polarising values in terms of right and wrong, good and evil, which has been coopted by terrorist organisations to convert a “seeker” into a lethal killer. The Islamist militant groups such as Islamic State, Ansarullah Bangladesh, Jama’at-ul Mujahideen Bangladesh (with close links with Afghan jihadis), Harkat-ul- Jehad-al-Islami Bangladesh (with close links with Al-Qaeda) and Hizbut Tohid in Bangladesh have consolidated and expanded their institutional transnational networks.33 Bangladesh’s land has also been used by the Indian northeast insurgent groups like the United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA), Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN), and Muslim United Liberation Tigers of Assam (MULTA), that started getting training in Bangladesh since 1992.34
Security Threats. In our scheme, control unit is trusted. Bio-sensors are honest to keep their keys secret. Devices beyond one specific BAN generally cannot sense personal physiolog- ical information. Even if some devices are able to sense physiological features, they can hardly to be adversaries because if they intend to play as adversaries and obtain the negotiated keys, they should be supposed to be physically close to users, which is easy to discover for general medical users. The security threats faced by a BAN are the adversaries that can transmit incorrect health data to access the medical users or eavesdrop physiological information for health data privacy leak- age. We categorize the security threats into active adver- saries and passive eavesdroppers as follows. (1)
