Specific Claims Sample Clauses
Specific Claims. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, nothing in this Agreement precludes a Maa-nulth First Nation from pursuing claims in accordance with Canada’s Specific Claims Policy.
Specific Claims. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, nothing in this Agreement precludes Yale First Nation from pursuing claims in accordance with Canada’s Specific Claims Policy.
Specific Claims. The only Warranties which shall apply in relation to:
(a) property matters shall be those set out in Part VIII of Schedule 2;
(b) Environmental Matters shall be those set out in Part IX of Schedule 2;
(c) intellectual property matters and Intellectual Property Rights shall be those set out in paragraph 9 of Part VI of Schedule 2;
(d) information technology systems matters shall be those set out in paragraph 11 of Part VI of Schedule 2;
(e) employment matters shall be those in Part XI of Schedule 2;
(f) pensions matters shall be those set out in Part XII of Schedule 2; and
(g) Tax shall be the Tax Warranties set out in Part XIII of Schedule 2.
Specific Claims. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Final Agreement, nothing in the Final Agreement will preclude Kitselas from pursuing any claims that fall within the scope of Canada’s Specific Claims Policy, in accordance with that policy, the Specific Claims Tribunal Act, or in court.
Specific Claims. 2.6.1 For greater certainty, nothing in the Final Agreement will affect the right of the Algonquins of Pikwàkanagàn First Nation to bring an action in court or file a claim under the Specific Claims Policy arising from any act or omission of Canada in relation to the administration of Pikwàkanagàn Indian Reserve No. 163 or Indian moneys or other assets of the First Nation under the Indian Act.
Specific Claims. The following documentation must be submitted to CBP in order for a drawback claim to be processed under this subpart. Missing documentation or incorrect or incomplete informa- tion on required customs forms or supporting documentation will result in an incomplete drawback claim.
(i) Manufacturing drawback claim. The following must be submit- xxx in connection with a claim for direct identification manufacturing drawback or substitution manufacturing drawback:
(A) A manufacturing drawback ruling number;
(B) CBP Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent, or the import entry number;
(C) Evidence of exportation and satisfactory evidence of the pay- ment of duties in Canada or Mexico. Satisfactory evidence must include the Canadian or Mexican customs entry number and the amount of duty paid to Canada or Mexico;
(D) Waiver of right to drawback. If the person exporting to Canada or Mexico was not the importer or the manufacturer, written waivers executed by the importer or manufacturer and by any intervening person to whom the good was transferred must be submitted in order for the claim to be considered complete; and
(E) An affidavit of the party claiming drawback stating that no other drawback claim has been made on the designated goods, that such party has not provided an exporter’s certification of origin per- taining to the exported goods to another party except as stated on the drawback claim, and that the party agrees to notify CBP if the party subsequently provides such an exporter’s certification of origin to any person.
(ii) Unused merchandise drawback claim under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1). The following must be submitted in connection with a drawback claim covering a good eligible for unused merchandise drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1):
(A) The foreign entry number and date of entry, the HTSUS clas- sification for the foreign entry, the amount of duties paid for the foreign entry and the applicable exchange rate. For goods in the same condition, a certification from the claimant that provides as follows: ‘‘Same condition—The undersigned certifies that the merchandise herein described is in the same condition as when it was imported under the import entry(s) and further certifies that this merchandise was not subjected to any process of manufacture or other operation except the allowable operations as provided for by regulation.’’;
(B) Information sufficient to trace the movement of the imported goods after importation;
(C) In-bond application submitted pu...
Specific Claims. I did not consider the Defendant’s witnesses to be independent. One of them claimed he began to do masonry work on a completely empty lot. This could not have been true. Xx. Xxxxxxx assisted the Defendant in his inflated claim for removal of debris. I believe he was paid no more than $1,500.00. I will allow the Claimant’s claim for $21,066.27 for electrical works. This lady paid $60,000.00 for electrical work but so far has not had the work approved by the relevant authorities – the Electrical Inspectorate. It is true that her own electrician did not get that done but he was hired to do corrective work. I accept his evidence as to what he considered unworkmanlike features of the work
Specific Claims. The following documentation, for the drawback claims specified below, must be submitted to CBP in order for a drawback claim to be processed under this subpart. Missing docu- mentation or incorrect or incomplete information on required cus- toms forms or supporting documentation will result in an incomplete drawback claim.
Specific Claims. The following documentation, for the drawback claims specified below, must be submitted to CBP in order for a drawback claim to be processed under this subpart. Missing documentation or incorrect or incomplete information on required customs forms or supporting documentation will result in an incomplete drawback claim.
Specific Claims. Genentech may, at its sole discretion and expense, file and prosecute a patent application that specifically claims [***]. In the event Genentech decides to do so, Genentech shall consult with Sangamo regarding such patent application and consider any comments from Sangamo, taking into account Sangamo’s business and intellectual property objectives regarding ZFNs. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary (including, without limitation, Section 4.2), Genentech shall solely own any patent applications filed pursuant to this Section 4.4(a) and any patents issued therefrom.