Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.
Target Population The Grantee shall ensure that diversion programs and services provided under this grant are designed to serve juvenile offenders who are at risk of commitment to Department.
Goal The goals of the Department’s grants are to:
Targets a) Seller’s supplier diversity spending target for Work supporting the construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date is ____ percent (___%) as measured relative to Seller’s total expenditures on construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date, and;
Development Milestones In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7.1, LICENSEE specifically commits to achieving (either itself or through the acts of a SUBLICENSEE) the following development milestones in its diligence activities under this AGREEMENT: (a) (b).
Multi-year Planning Targets Schedule A may reflect an allocation for the first Funding Year of this Agreement as well as planning targets for up to two additional years, consistent with the term of this Agreement. In such an event, the HSP acknowledges that if it is provided with planning targets, these targets:
Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.
Targets and Milestones For the purposes of this Access Agreement, the University of Bristol will assess progress in widening participation against a combination of progress measures which, between them, are designed to assess: The specific impact of a number of key outreach initiatives. Year on year progress in diversifying our applicant and student population. Bearing in mind the range of outreach activities which we plan to offer, we intend to measure year on year progress in attracting a wider pool of applicants by focusing on each of the following categories: Applicants from low performing schools Mature applicants Applicants from low participation areas Applicants from socio-economic groups 4-7 Applicants from minority ethnic groups Disabled applicants Local applicants Progress measures for each of these categories are provided at Appendix Five. As far as possible, these have been calculated taking account of the expected impact of a number of specific outreach initiatives (the Access to Bristol scheme, summer school programme and personal adviser scheme), each of which also has more detailed performance targets associated with them (also detailed at Appendix Five). Our assumption is that increases in the percentage of applications from under represented groups will not be achieved at the expense of applications from more traditional markets. To achieve the specified increases, we will therefore also need to increase the absolute number of applications from under- represented groups (and so the overall number of applications to the University). Only two of these categories have any bearing on our admissions process, which provides for school performance and mature applicant status to be taken into account as part of a holistic selection process. For this reason, measurement of the University’s intake profile will be focused on these categories only. All progress measures will be re-calculated annually to reflect assessment of our progress to date. In addition, it should be noted that we intend to carry out further research, for example, to better understand the impact of educational standards in the Bristol area on our ability to progress at the specified rates; we may need to adjust the progress measures contained in this agreement for future years to reflect the findings. We also hope to develop measures to assess the contribution of our collaborative activity to widening participation to the Higher Education sector as a whole but, as we are still in the early stages of agreeing our approach to this, it is too early to articulate these measures.
Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards. Section 200.301 provides guidance to Federal agencies to measure performance in a way that will help the Federal awarding agency and other non-Federal entities to improve program outcomes.