- Technical review of the project Sample Clauses

- Technical review of the project. 1. The Commission may initiate a technical review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the duration of the project in order to verify that the project is being or has been carried out in accordance with the conditions governing this grant agreement, in particular with respect to the Description of Work (Annex I). The technical review shall assess the work carried out under the project by, among other things, evaluating the project reports and deliverables, the proper use of resources in particular with respect to efficiency and effectiveness, the management of the project and the expected impact. The technical review shall be deemed to be initiated on the date of receipt by the coordinator of the relevant notification sent by the Commission. The technical review procedure shall be carried out on a confidential basis. 2. For the technical review, the Commission may be assisted by independent experts. The Commission shall take appropriate steps to ensure that such experts treat confidentially the data that are communicated to them. Prior to the technical review, it shall communicate to the coordinator the identity of the experts who are intended to assist it. It shall take account of any objection on the part of beneficiaries based on legitimate interests. 3. Technical reviews may be carried out remotely at the experts’ home or place of work or involve sessions with project representatives either at the Commission premises or at the premises of beneficiaries. The Commission or the external experts may have access to the locations and premises where the work is being carried out and to any document concerning the work. 4. The beneficiaries shall make available to the Commission and any external experts all detailed information and data that may be requested by it or the experts for the technical review. 5. A report on the technical review of the project shall be sent to the coordinator. The latter may communicate observations to the Commission within a month of receiving it. The Commission may decide not to take into account any observations conveyed after that deadline. 6. On the basis of the conclusions of the technical review, the Commission shall take all appropriate measures which it considers necessary, including the rejection of any reports and deliverables, the termination of the agreement pursuant to Article II.10 and II.11 and the reduction of the grant pursuant to Article II.25(5).
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
- Technical review of the project. 1. The Commission may initiate a technical review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the duration of the project in order to verify that the project is being or has been carried out in accordance with the conditions governing this grant agreement, in particular with respect to the Description of Work (Annex I). The technical review shall assess the work carried out under the project by, among other things, evaluating the project reports and deliverables, the proper use of resources in particular with respect to efficiency and effectiveness, the management of the project and the expected impact. The technical review shall be deemed to be initiated on the date of receipt by the coordinator of the relevant notification sent by the Commission. The technical review procedure shall be carried out on a confidential basis. 2. For the technical review, the Commission may be assisted by independent experts. The Commission shall take appropriate steps to ensure that such experts treat confidentially the data that are communicated to them. Prior to the technical review, it shall communicate to the coordinator the identity of the experts who are intended to assist it. It shall take account of any objection on the part of beneficiaries based on legitimate interests. 3. Technical reviews may be carried out remotely at the experts’ home or place of work or involve sessions with project representatives either at the Commission premises or at the premises of beneficiaries. The Commission or the external experts may have access to the locations and premises where the work is being carried out and to any document concerning the work.
Sample 1Sample 2
- Technical review of the project. 1. The Commission, or any representative authorised by it, may initiate a technical review up to the agreement completion date in order to verify that the project is being or has been carried out in accordance with the conditions governing this agreement. The technical review procedure shall be carried out on a confidential basis. 2. In the framework of the technical review the Commission may be assisted by independent experts. It shall take appropriate steps to ensure that such experts treat confidentially the data that are communicated to them. Prior to such meetings, it shall communicate to the coordinator the identity of the experts who are intended to assist it. It shall take account of any objection on the part of beneficiaries based on legitimate interests. 3. The Commission or any authorised representative may have access to the locations and premises where the work is being carried out, and to any document concerning the work, and may request the submission of documents under the same identical conditions as those set out in Article II.18(2). 4. Beneficiaries shall provide appropriate assistance to the Commission or the independent experts assigned by the Commission. 5. A report on the technical review of the project shall be sent to the coordinator. The latter may communicate observations to the Commission within a month of receiving it. The Commission may decide not to take into account the observations conveyed after that deadline. 6. On the basis of the conclusions of the review, the Commission shall take all appropriate measures which it considers necessary, including the rejection of any deliverables which were previously approved pursuant to Article II.4, the termination of the agreement pursuant to Article II.9 and the reduction of the grant or any pre-financing pursuant to Article II.17.2 (c).
Sample 1
- Technical review of the project. II.20.1 The Commission, or any representative authorised by it, may initiate a technical review at any time throughout the period of implementation of the agreement until the balance is paid in order to verify that the action is being or has been carried out in accordance with the conditions in this agreement. In the framework of the technical review, the Commission may be assisted by independent experts. The technical review procedure shall be carried out on a confidential basis. II.20.2 The beneficiaries undertake to allow Commission staff and any authorised representative (including any experts assisting the Commission in the review) the appropriate right of access to sites and premises where the action is carried out and to all the information, including information in electronic format, needed in order to conduct the technical review. II.20.3 Prior to the carrying out of the technical review, the Commission shall communicate to the co-ordinator the identity of the authorised representatives (including any experts assisting the Commission) who are intended to perform the review. It shall take account of any objection on the part of beneficiaries based on legitimate interests. II.20.4 Beneficiaries shall provide appropriate assistance to the Commission or its authorised representatives (including any experts assisting the Commission). II.20.5 A report on the technical review of the action shall be sent to the co- ordinator. The latter may communicate his observations to the Commission within a month of receiving it. The Commission may decide not to take into account the observations conveyed after that deadline. SIGNATURES For the co-ordinator: For the Commission eGovernance Academy Frans de Bruïne Xxxx XXXXX and/or Xx Xxxx XXX Director, ICT for Citizens and Businesses Done at date Done at Brussels, In duplicate in English Annex I Description of Work A. Title page Proposal acronym: TID+ Proposal full title: Enabling citizen’s initiative to eParticipation
Sample 1
- Technical review of the project. 1. The Commission may initiate a technical review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the duration of the project in order to verify that the project is being or has been carried out in accordance with the conditions governing this grant agreement, in particular with respect to the Description of Work (Annex I). The technical review shall assess the 7 OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p. 2. 8 OJ L 136, 31.5.1999. 9 OJ L 136, 31.5.1999 work carried out under the project by, among other things, evaluating the project reports and deliverables, the proper use of resources in particular with respect to efficiency and effectiveness, the management of the project and the expected impact. The technical review shall be deemed to be initiated on the date of receipt by the coordinator of the relevant notification sent by the Commission. The technical review procedure shall be carried out on a confidential basis. 2. For the technical review, the Commission may be assisted by independent experts. The Commission shall take appropriate steps to ensure that such experts treat confidentially the data that are communicated to them. Prior to the technical review, it shall communicate to the coordinator the identity of the experts who are intended to assist it. It shall take account of any objection on the part of beneficiaries based on legitimate interests. 3. Technical reviews may be carried out remotely at the experts’ home or place of work or involve sessions with project representatives either at the Commission premises or at the premises of beneficiaries. The Commission or the external experts may have access to the locations and premises where the work is being carried out and to any document concerning the work. 4. The beneficiaries shall make available to the Commission and any external experts all detailed information and data that may be requested by it or the experts for the technical review. 5. A report on the technical review of the project shall be sent to the coordinator. The latter may communicate observations to the Commission within a month of receiving it. The Commission may decide not to take into account any observations conveyed after that deadline. 6. On the basis of the conclusions of the technical review, the Commission shall take all appropriate measures which it considers necessary, including the rejection of any reports and deliverables, the termination of the agreement pursuant to Article
Sample 1

Related to - Technical review of the project

  • Geotechnical Engineer « »« » « » « » « » « »

  • Synchronization, Commissioning and Commercial Operation 4.1.1 The Power Producer shall give at least fifteen (15) days written notice to the SLDC / ALDC / DISCOM as the case may be, of the date on which it intends to synchronize the Power Project to the Grid System. 4.1.2 Subject to Article 4.1.1, the Power Project may be synchronized by the Power Producer to the Grid System when it meets all the connection conditions prescribed in the Grid Code and otherwise meets all other Indian legal requirements for synchronization to the Grid System. 4.1.3 The synchronization equipment and all necessary arrangements / equipment including Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) for scheduling of power generated from the Project and transmission of data to the concerned authority as per applicable regulation shall be installed by the Power Producer at its generation facility of the Power Project at its own cost. The Power Producer shall synchronize its system with the Grid System only after the approval of GETCO / SLDC / ALDC and GEDA. 4.1.4 The Power Producer shall immediately after each synchronization / tripping of generator, inform the sub-station of the Grid System to which the Power Project is electrically connected in accordance with applicable Grid Code. 4.1.5 The Power Producer shall commission the Project within SCOD. 4.1.6 The Power Producer shall be required to obtain Developer and/ or Transfer Permission, Key Plan drawing etc, if required, from GEDA. In cases of conversion of land from Agricultural to Non-Agriculture, the commissioning shall be taken up by GEDA only upon submission of N.A. permission by the Power Producer. 4.1.7 The Power Producer shall be required to follow the Forecasting and Scheduling procedures as per the Regulations issued by Hon’ble GERC from time to time. It is to clarify that in terms of GERC (Forecasting, Scheduling, Deviation Settlement and Related Matters of Solar and Wind Generation Sources) Regulations, 2019 the procedures for Forecasting, Scheduling & Deviation Settlment are applicable to all solar generators having combined installed capacity above 1 MW connected to the State Grid / Substation including those connected via pooling stations.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Contractor Project Manager The Contractor Project Manager shall serve, from the Effective Date, as the Contractor project manager and primary Contractor representative under this Agreement. The Contractor Project Manager shall (i) have overall responsibility for managing and coordinating the performance of Contractor’s obligations under this Agreement, including the performance of all Subcontractors; and (ii) be authorized to act for and bind Contractor and Subcontractors in connection with all aspects of this Agreement. The Contractor Project Manager shall respond promptly and fully to all inquiries from the JBE Project Manager.

  • Training Program It is agreed that there shall be an Apprenticeship Training Program, the provisions of which are set forth in Exhibit "D", which is attached hereto and forms part of this Agreement.

  • Construction Phase Services 3.1.1 – Basic Construction Services

  • Commissioning Commissioning tests of the Interconnection Customer’s installed equipment shall be performed pursuant to applicable codes and standards. The ISO and Connecting Transmission Owner must be given at least five Business Days written notice, or as otherwise mutually agreed to by the Parties, of the tests and may be present to witness the commissioning tests.

  • REVIEW OF WORK The Consultant shall permit the City, its agents and/or employees to review, at any time, all work performed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement at any stage of the work;

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract. a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors and suppliers and lessors of their EEO obligations under this contract. b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to ensure subcontractor compliance with their EEO obligations.

  • Configuration Management The Contractor shall maintain a configuration management program, which shall provide for the administrative and functional systems necessary for configuration identification, control, status accounting and reporting, to ensure configuration identity with the UCEU and associated cables produced by the Contractor. The Contractor shall maintain a Contractor approved Configuration Management Plan that complies with ANSI/EIA-649 2011. Notwithstanding ANSI/EIA-649 2011, the Contractor’s configuration management program shall comply with the VLS Configuration Management Plans, TL130-AD-PLN-010-VLS, and shall comply with the following:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!