Types of Reviews. Faculty Members shall have the following types of reviews: • Performance and developmental reviews • Tenure and promotion reviews
Types of Reviews. Career growth increments (Article 19.10.1) Annual Reviews for renewal of tenure track (Article 19.10.2) Reviews for tenure (Article 19.10.3) Four-year review for academic staff with tenure (Article 19.10.4) Review for Department Head (Article 19.10.5) Formal review for promotion (Article 19.10.6) Reviewing members who are on Sabbatical, Secondment, or Leave (Article 19.10.7)
Types of Reviews. We defined reviews as a systematic review or meta-analysis. In instances where it was not explicitly stated, we considered a review to be systematic if it employed a detailed methodological search strategy with specified electronic databases and search terms. Forms of GBV Although GBV has many forms, we focused on five types: 1) child abuse/ maltreatment,
Types of Reviews a. A standard review is one that takes place every two (2) years at the Assistant and Associate rank and every three (3) years at the Librarian rank.
Types of Reviews. Career growth increments (Article 19.10.1) Annual Reviews for renewal of tenure track (Article
Types of Reviews. The IRO(s) and HCA appropriate internal resources or directed external resources shall annually perform the reviews described in the audit work plans (“workplans”) attached to, and incorporated by reference into, this CIA. The workplans address the following areas: (1) Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs); (2) Laboratory Billing; (3) Outpatient Prospective Payment; and (4) Physician Relationships. The workplans require reviews of systems and processes in place at HCA and its facilities, and of claims submitted by HCA and paid by Federal health care programs (the physician relationship workplan includes review of physician relationships rather than claims). The reviews of claims more specifically described in the workplans fall into two general categories: (1) probe samples of a set number of claims (with no pre-determined statistical confidence or precision parameters); and (2) full samples of claims from which an overpayment amount can be projected to the total population of claims in question within pre-determined statistical confidence and precision parameters. HCA and the IRO will evaluate the IRO work plans annually based upon prior year results. If appropriate, HCA will submit revised IRO work plan(s) to the OIG for its review and action.
Types of Reviews. The IRO will conduct three separate reviews annually. One will be an annual review of Olsten's xxxxxxxx and submissions (and the underlying services provided) to all Federal health care programs to determine compliance with all applicable statutes, regulations, and policies (billing engagement). The second will be a review to determine whether Olsten is in compliance with the terms of this CIA (compliance engagement). The third will be a review of Olsten's cost report processes and procedures and a review of any procedures or processes implemented by Olsten to address recommendations by the Fiscal Intermediary as part of the Fiscal Intermediary's annual review of Olsten's cost reports.
Types of Reviews. The IRO(s) and HCA appropriate internal resources or directed external resources shall annually perform the reviews described in the audit work plans ("workplans") attached to, and incorporated by reference into, this CIA. The workplans address the following areas: (1) Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs); (2) Laboratory Billing; (3) Outpatient Prospective Payment; and (4) Physician Relationships. The workplans require reviews of systems and processes in place at HCA and its facilities, and of claims submitted by HCA and paid by Federal health care programs (the
Types of Reviews. The Independent Review Organization will conduct the reviews consistent with the IRO workplan attached as Schedule B, and made part of this Agreement.
Types of Reviews. Career growth increments (Article 19.10.1) Annual Reviews for renewal of probation (Article 19.10.2) Reviews for permanency (Article 19.10.3) Four-year review for academic staff with permanency (Article 19.10.4) Review for Department Head (Article 19.10.5) Formal review for promotion (Article 19.10.6) Reviewing members who are on Sabbatical, Secondment, or Leave (Article 19.10.7)
