Search Strategy. The search strategy followed MOOSE (Stroup, Berlin, Xxxxxx, et al, 2000) and PRISMA (Moher, Xxxxxxxx, Tetzlaff, et al, 2009) reporting guidelines and the review protocol is registered with the PROSPERO database of systematic reviews (registration number CRD42011001281). 18 bibliographic databases were searched from their respective dates of inception to 31st March 2011, using a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and text words (see Box 1 for a list of the databases). Terms for domestic violence were adapted from published Cochrane protocols and previous literature reviews (Xxxxxx & Xxxxx, 2006; Xxxxxxxx & Xxxx, 2007; Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx, et al, 2002). Search terms for mental disorders were adapted from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2008) (see Appendix 1 for a full list of search terms). No language restrictions were used and potentially eligible papers were translated and assessments conducted using the English translated versions. These searches were supplemented by citation tracking (i.
Search Strategy. The following databases were systematically searched from August 2013 until May 2015: OVID including MedLine, EMBASE and PsychInfo, Pubmed and Web of Science. The following terms were used in the keyword search of abstracts and titles (internet or online or web-based or website or mobile) AND (bipolar disorder or manic depression or manic depressive illness or manic-depressive psychosis or psychosis or schizophr* or psychotic). Additionally, hand-searching was performed on five key journals (Schizophrenia Bulletin, Schizophrenia Research, Journal of Medical Internet research, Telemedicine and e-health, Psychiatric Services) along with the reference lists of included primary studies. The term ‘adherence’ was purposely not included in the search terms as this would significantly limit the number of included studies. Most studies do not include references to reported adherence in the title or abstract (Xxxxx et al., 2014).
Search Strategy. Using the electronic search strategy, we identified 377 articles whose titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion (Figure 2.1). Twelve met inclusion criteria (13-24). An additional 3 articles meeting inclusion criteria were found by searching reference lists (25-27), and a fourth was found by searching for articles citing included articles (28). Three of these four studies were likely not found by the electronic search strategy because results for several birth defects were presented in the article and NTDs were not specifically mentioned in the abstract (25, 26, 28). In the fourth, the word “weight” was used in the title and abstract, and words “body mass index” and “obesity” were only included in the full text of the article (27). Characteristics of the 16 included studies are shown in Table 2.2. Most studies used a case-control design, were conducted in the United States, used birth defect surveillance as a source of cases, and obtained information on BMI from maternal self-report. There were 13 studies of NTDs (13-18, 20-23, 25, 27, 28), 6 studies of xxxxx bifida (15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 28), and 5 studies of anencephaly (16, 18, 22, 23, 28) in which infants of obese mothers were compared to those of normal weight mothers, and 15 studies of NTDs (13-23, 25-27), 7 studies of xxxxx bifida (15, 16, 18, 20-23), and 6 studies of anencephaly (16, 18, 20-23) in which infants of obese mothers were compared to those of non-obese mothers. All studies published after 2000 used a BMI cutpoint of 30 kg/m2 for obesity, except one that used a cutpoint of 27 kg/m2 (26). Studies published in 2000 and prior used cutpoints of 28 kg/m2 (25), 29 kg/m2 (15, 19, 20, 24), 31 kg/m2 (21), and 32 kg/m2 (27) for obesity. When obese mothers were compared to normal weight mothers, we found a weak association between prepregnancy obesity and anencephaly (summary OR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.58; Figure 2.2, Table 2.3). The association was stronger when using non-obese mothers as the reference group (summary OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07-1.70, Figure 2.3). Restricting only to studies that had contributed to both meta-analyses did not change results; the association was again stronger when using the dichotomized version of obesity (Table 2.4). For xxxxx bifida, the association was stronger when using non-obese compared to normal weight mothers as the reference group (summary OR using normal weight reference group: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.29, Figure 2.4; summary OR using non-obese reference group: 1...
Search Strategy. The choice of databases (PubMed, GoogleScholar, JSTOR, and EBSCO) may be a limitation of this systematic literature review. Additionally, the rapidly evolving impact bond and innovative financing fields may result in the systematic review quickly becoming outdated. Subsequent similar analyses and theses occurring after 2019 should redo the systematic literature search to ensure they capture the most up-to-date information. The search terms used also may have skewed the literature review and resulting evidence base to capture more resources and literature on DIBs rather than SIBs. The search terms used focused more on researching impact bonds applied in LMIC contexts or the global health context and had less search terms focused on the US, UK, or other high-income contexts more apt to use SIBs. In future reviews, a broader or more comprehensive list of search terms may be used if SIBs are a key target and theme.
Search Strategy. The search terms used were: (Acquired OR Trauma*) AND (Frontal AND (Damage OR Lesion OR Injury) AND ((Emotion* OR Affect* OR (Complex OR Social AND Emotion* OR Affect*) OR (Sad* OR Happ* OR Disgust OR Anger OR Angry OR Fear* OR Surprise)) AND (Perception OR Perceive OR Detection OR Processing OR Recog*).
Search Strategy. The Contractor shall identify both published and unpublished models. The Contractor shall search the following databases to identify published studies: Xxxxxxx; EMBASE; Biological Abstract; PsychINFO; Sociofile; Social Science Citation Index; CINAHL; Dissertation Abstracts; XXXX, Psychological Abstracts, Xxxxxxxx databases. The Contractor shall use the following sources to identify unpublished studies: NSPCC library and database, The Cochrane Library, Current Controlled Trials, and the Register of the Medical Editors Trial Amnesty. Authors of papers included in the review will be also be contacted to identify unpublished research. The Contractor shall also undertake a search of the internet. The Contractor shall examine reference lists of articles identified through database searches and bibliographies of systematic and non-systematic review articles to identify further relevant studies. The Contractor shall hand search relevant journals (e.g. Child Abuse and Neglect; Child Abuse Review; Children and Youth Services etc), seek advice from national bodies, Governmental (DfE, DH) and non-governmental (NSPCC, Barnardos), and also approach key authorities in the field (x.x. Xxxx Xxxxx; Xxx Xxxxxxx; Xxxxxx Xxxxx; Xxxxxx Xxxxxx), and other judicial and legal contacts (e.g. Xxxx XX, Xxxx J, XxxXxxxxxx J) in order to locate all models that are being used, and any research studies on their effectiveness. The Contractor shall adapt the search terms used to identify relevant studies for use in the different databases. No methodological terms will be included to ensure that all relevant papers are retrieved.
Search Strategy. A review of the literature exploring the role of the nurse undertaking activities and interventions associated with different healthcare settings including A&E was conducted using the methodological framework described by Xxxxxx and X’Xxxxxx (2005). The framework commences with identifying the research question, followed by identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting the data and finally collating, summarising and assembling the findings. Central to the scope was the utilisation of 5 electronic databases: CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature); BNI (British Nursing Index); MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane database (January 1991 – June 2015). The search commenced from January 1991 as this coincided with the publication of several prominent documents (National Association for the Welfare of Children in Hospital (NAWCH) 1991, DH 1991a, DH 1991b) which revisited the needs of children since the initial child health recommendations in the Xxxxx report (Ministry of Health1959). The year 1991 was also followed by several influential documents relating specifically to children’s A&E care (The Audit Commission 1996, RCPCH 1999). Different databases were selected because they contained the largest and most comprehensive indexing of nursing literature and were recommended by the United States (US) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, along with the United Kingdom (UK) Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) and Cochrane Collaboration (Eden et al 2011). The scoping review involved a structured search utilising MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms and free text pertaining to children’s A&E nursing. Key search terms such as ‘nurse, child, paediatric/pediatric, A&E, emergency department, activities, interventions’ were combined using Boolean combinations to search the selected databases. Other descriptors such as ‘tasks’, ‘duties’, ‘roles’ and ‘skills’ were also utilised during the search. This was followed by hand searching the reference lists of all relevant papers for further studies. Additional primary sources were identified through the reference list of those articles selected. The titles and abstracts of all published and unpublished studies identified between January 1991 and June 2015 were assessed. It was also deemed important to consider those publications not in English; however, due to time constraints and cost, only publications available in English language were included. The title and abstracts of 4,820 papers ...
Search Strategy. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Xxxxx et al., 2009). The protocol was registered on PROSPERO on 28th November 2017 (registration number: CRD42017082423). The final search was carried out on 21st November 2019 in Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception using the following search strategy: • violen* OR aggressi* • risk OR risk assessment OR predict* OR antecedent • inpatient OR hospitali?ed OR mental OR psych* OR forensic OR secur* • dynamic OR fluctuat* OR imminent A grey literature search was undertaken through BASE, and reference lists of identified papers were searched for additional relevant studies. Two authors (BG and RT) independently screened studies by titles and abstracts and reviewed the full text to assess eligibility. Any inconsistencies were discussed until consensus was achieved. Data extraction for all identified studies was performed by BG, with RT independently extracting data from 25% of identified studies. Extracted data, consisting of the study country, participant demographics, study design and methodology, and aggressive outcomes, were cross- checked between both authors to ensure accuracy. Where relevant information was not reported in the text, the authors were contacted to request this information. For quantitative studies, all risk factors were extracted irrespective of their significance to investigate whether the relevance of specific risk factors differed across samples. Where studies reported risk factors which appeared to refer to the same overarching domain, but whose terminology differed due to the measure used (e.g. ‘mental state’ and ‘mental health’), these were grouped under one risk factor.
Search Strategy. A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed scientific literature was conducted in August 2016 to identify studies that provide evidence relating to the effectiveness, costs and cost-effectiveness of SS or similar programs provided by pharmacists to individuals living in the community. Four electronic databases were searched for original research papers describing systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or comparative studies, as shown in Table 3.2. The search of Medline, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the Cochrane Library was unrestricted by date and was searched up to 23rd August 2016. The specific search terms used to identify relevant literature are outlined in Appendix 3. The Health Systems Evidence database (McMaster Health Forum) and databases maintained by Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies1 were also searched to identify relevant literature. A search of pharmacy organisations2 and the grey literature was also performed to identify previous evaluations of the SS initiative in Australia, and similar community pharmacist-led programs from other jurisdictions. The reference lists of evaluation reports were examined to identify studies not otherwise found in the literature searches.
1 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) at AHRQ; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) at CADTH Reports; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) at NICE, UK
2 Including Pharmacy Guild of Australia; Pharmaceutical Society of Australia; and Australian Association of Consultant Pharmacy.
Search Strategy. Searches of electronic databases Embase, Scopus, Ovid Medline, Pubmed, Web of knowledge and Web of science using the following search terms/key words in combination with Boolean operators: Biomarkers Fat Fat intake Adipose tissue Fatty acids FFQ Plasma Plasma phospholipids Lipids Food diary Recall Plasma TAG Erythrocytes PL Buccal cells Cholesteryl ester Duplicate diets Weighed intake
