University strategies Reviewing Existing Facilities Sample Clauses

University strategies Reviewing Existing Facilities. CQUniversity will continue to be responsive to the changing needs of students and contemporary program delivery. Planning of facilities requirements will be interdependent with the operational plans of University business units – particularly those involved with the direct delivery of teaching and ancillary services to students. Present-day learning styles require a mix of physical environments which differ from those which were operated by the University 10 – 20 years ago. A focus on collaborative learning, group/social engagement, access for student-owned mobile devices, audio-visual requirements and the fast pace of technological change is contributing to a noticeable challenging shift in the types of facilities the University needs to provide. Programs and research areas are being developed by the University in disciplines which in many cases require specialist spaces and equipment for technically-oriented course delivery. Innovative approaches will continue to be developed where specialist requirements in like disciplines can be grouped together, technologies can be implemented for remote access and future or changing requirements can be accommodated on an as-needs basis with little difficulty. CQUniversity will regularly seek student, staff and community feedback both in a holistic (University wide) manner, as well as relating to individual projects and key associated cohorts. This collaborative approach to facilities review and project delivery will continue to ensure the contemporary expectations of all stakeholders are met in a balanced manner. A strategic view of facilities planning will be undertaken at the management level of the University through the executive committee structure, continued master planning at campus level and the implementation of a comprehensive Strategic Asset Management Framework and Plan (SAMF/P). In combination with academic input these will drive a suitable mix of facilities at all locations including metropolitan and regional operations. Renewal and capital delivery will therefore be driven by the availability of funding resulting from the University’s program changes and grant applications including Structural Adjustment. Daytime Space Utilisation Rates CQUniversity will have an infrastructure, systems and policy driven approach to space management, which will drive efficiencies in utilisation across the campus portfolio. CQUniversity understands that the provision of capital infrastructure either by new build or refu...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to University strategies Reviewing Existing Facilities

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

  • Professional Development Reimbursement Management will provide reimbursement for approved professional development expenses for Lieutenants and Sergeants. Funds may be used for the purpose of improving job performance, maintaining and increasing proficiency, preparing Lieutenants and Sergeants for greater responsibility, or increasing promotional opportunities. Management must approve of the specific professional development request in advance. Denial will require written notification to the requesting Lieutenant or Sergeant.

  • Independent Development Receiving Party may currently or in the future be developing information internally, or receiving information internally, or receiving information from other parties that may be similar to the Disclosing Party's Confidential Information. Accordingly, nothing in this Agreement will be construed as a representation or inference that Receiving Party will not develop or have developed products or services, that, without violation of this Agreement, might compete with the products or systems contemplated by the Disclosing Party's Confidential Information.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Statewide HUB Program Statewide Procurement Division Note: In order for State agencies and institutions of higher education (universities) to be credited for utilizing this business as a HUB, they must award payment under the Certificate/VID Number identified above. Agencies, universities and prime contractors are encouraged to verify the company’s HUB certification prior to issuing a notice of award by accessing the Internet (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/tpasscmblsearch/index.jsp) or by contacting the HUB Program at 000-000-0000 or toll-free in Texas at 0-000-000-0000.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.