Community Feedback d) The accomplishment of tasks agreed upon as part of any work plan written in conjunction with the leaders of the District safety committee.
Community Feedback. It is further agreed that the City will provide comparable crime information for the City as a whole to facilitate the evaluation to include what proportion of activities City-wide occur on Housing Authority property.
Community Feedback. Throughout the NEPA study, there has been overwhelming support for a direct multimodal connection between Crystal City and DCA. During each public engagement period, the vast majority of individuals surveyed indicated they would use a CC2DCA connection if constructed. When defining their priorities, respondents strongly favored a potential connection that is safe, quick, direct, and connects other transportation modes. During the latest public engagement cycle, which focused on the public review of the Environmental Assessment and Programmatic Agreement, individuals had an opportunity to comment directly on the proposed terms of the Programmatic Agreement. Many of the comments received focused solely on the Environmental Assessment. However, a small number of individuals did provide comments on the Programmatic Agreement. While still supportive of the overall project, these comments conveyed concerns with the design review commitments between Arlington County and the National Park Service as specified in the Programmatic Agreement.
Community Feedback. As a proud member of the community, UGM values comments and suggestions from our neighbours and strives to be a responsible, helpful pillar of the DTES while providing a comprehensive continuum of care. Suggestions and complaints are welcome, both of which UGM commits to carefully review. UGM will reply to each suggestion and complaint in a timely manner as spelled out in the complaint process on page 6. Use contact the information below to reach UGM at any time: Online: xxx.xxx.xx/xxxxxxxxx By telephone: 000.000.0000 By email: xxxxxxxxx@xxx.xx By mail: Community Relations Coordinator c/o Union Gospel Mission 000 Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, XX X0X 0X0 Of note: UGM’s Xxxxxxx Street facility now has 24-hour emergency contact information posted on the reception area doors (on Xxxxxxx side of the building). Complaint Process UGM’s President, Community Relations Coordinator (CRC) or delegate will address and resolve day-today concerns from the community as they arise and will work with local community policing operations when appropriate. UGM commits to respond to community complaints through the following process:
Community Feedback. 9 out of 10 respondents to the Living in Lancashire survey, consider their local area to be safe and over half believe this compares favourably to the national picture. Whilst 4 out of 5 tell us that anti-social behaviour isn't a problem in their area, we continue to improve our approach in providing support for the most vulnerable in our communities. Our Challenge Our ambition is to deliver stronger services. We will use the reality of diminishing resources as an opportunity to focus our efforts to work more effectively and efficiently. It is vital that we identify the key issues that cause harm to our communities, which we will do by working in partnership to ensure we achieve the greatest impact. Our evidence base repeatedly identifies a number of key issues which continue to impact across the county, including: Anti-Social Behaviour Child Sexual Exploitation Domestic Abuse Road Safety Violent Crime For a breakdown of local breakdown of issues, see xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx Crime and anti-social behaviour are symptoms of underlying behaviours that are determined by a number of contributory and causal factors or determinants. The key factors identified are: Alcohol and Drugs Reoffending Interpersonal Violence Health Deprivation Partners across the public and voluntary, community and faith sectors (VCFS) are meeting the challenge of reduced budgets and shrinking resources whilst at the same time experiencing a rising demand for service. Ensuring connectivity between organisations and taking the right action the first time has never been more important in working with our communities to address harm, reduce vulnerability and prevent escalation to statutory services. As such we need a partnership landscape that addresses shared priorities, reduces duplication and brings added value. It is apparent that we need to move away from addressing 'symptoms' and take timely action to address root causes. These factors must be addressed in order to have any long-term impact on crime and anti-social behaviour, with complementary delivery at the appropriate level. The Living in Lancashire survey shows that whilst most communities consider their local area to be safe, there remains a significant worry regarding issues affecting their quality of life (e.g. noise and general nuisance).
Community Feedback. Key Themes Overall, feedback from the community was generally neutral to positive – with an expressed desire to proceed with the project. • Alternative Bus Options • Bicycle Infrastructure • Communities as “Pass-Through” • EIR and Environmental Concerns • Grade Separation • Project Costs and Allocation of Funds • Regional and Local Connectivity • Train Infrastructure • Train Station Options • Train Technology • Transit Oriented Development • Noise and Vibration Transportation Public Sector Coordination Name Jurisdiction/Area of Interest Caltrain Caltrain Business Plan, Redwood City Station, HSR Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) Fremont Centerville Station Capitol Corridor (Amtrak) Coast Sub, Ardenwood Station Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Union City Station, Xxxxx Connection Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Commuter rail option, Coast Sub / Niles Sub / Oakland Sub Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Plan Bay Area 2050 process Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) Southern Alameda County Integrated Rail Plan CalSTA and Caltrans State Rail Plan coordination, Northern California 16 Mega Region coordination of rail projects Resource Agencies Coordination Name Areas of Interest State Historic Preservation Office National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 Consultation State Lands Commission State lands lease agreement US Environmental Protection Agency Clean Water Act and Section 309 (Clean Air Act) review of NEPA documents US Fish & Wildlife Service Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation and Biological Opinion, Depredation Permit, Encroachment Permit Xxx Xxxxxxx SF Bay Wildlife Refuge Encroachment permit, owner of parcels within 300 feet of alignment US Coast Guard Bridge permits, technical design assistance SF Bay Conservation and Development Commission 401 Water Quality Certification and other permits for construction US Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 14 or Individual Permit, Section 10 Permit, Joint Aquatic Resource Permit Application National Marine Fisheries Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation and Biological Opinion, Essential Fish Habitat Consultation, and Incidental Harassment Authorization/Letter of Stakeholder Name Key Issues Tri-Cities (Fremont, Newark, Union City) Proposed and planned projects related to development, corridors, and stations and connection to existing rail providers Fremont Connection to existing rail providers Newark Coordination with planned projects Union City Connection to Union City ...
Community Feedback. It is further agreed, to facilitate the evaluation, the City will provide comparable crime information for the City as a whole to facilitate the evaluation to include what proportion of activities City-wide occur within or near the Omni CRA Area.
Community Feedback. Provide any feedback from your ridership and the broader community.
