Validating Capabilities Sample Clauses

Validating Capabilities. Exercises examine and validate capabilities-based planning across the Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response, and Recovery mission areas. The extensive engagement of the whole community, including but not limited to examining the needs and requirements for individuals with disabilities, individuals with limited English proficiency, and others with access and functional needs, is essential to the development of an effective and comprehensive exercise program. Exercises are designed to be progressive – increasing in scope and complexity and drawing upon results and outcomes from prior exercises and real- world incidents – to challenge participating communities. Consistent with Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program guidance and tools, the National Exercise Program (NEP) serves as the principal exercise mechanism for examining national preparedness and measuring readiness. Exercises should align with priorities and capabilities identified in a multi-year TEP.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Validating Capabilities. A. INTEGRATED PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (IPP) The Sub-Recipient shall develop and maintain an Integrated Preparedness Program (IPP) that identifies a combination of exercises and associated training requirements that address priorities and build gaps identified in the Integrated Preparedness Program Workshop (IPPW) and builds from training gaps identified in the county assessment process. The IPP is designed to consolidate the training and exercise that will be undertaken by any and all stakeholders within the State of Florida in an effort to maximize opportunities to coordinate, collaborate, and improve effectiveness of each stakeholder’s (the Whole Community) capacity/capability when responding or assisting in the response to, recovery from, and mitigation of impacts from any of the “All Hazards” threats. Training and exercises play a crucial role in this strategy, providing the State with a means of attaining, practicing, validating, and improving core capabilities. In order to demonstrate successful completion of task 3 for quarter 4, the Recipient must submit the following items to the Staff Development Training Consultant: DELIVERABLES • The County 2023-2025 IPP by February 1, 2022 and submit to Xxx Xxxxx, Staff Development Training Consultant at email: Xxx.Xxxxx@xx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx Phone: (000) 000-0000. Reporting Requirements: Xxxxxxx 0 Xxxxxxx 0 Xxxxxxx 0 Xxxxxxx 0 XX XX Deliverables Due NA Supporting Documentation: Submission of IPP by Division Training and Exercise Section not later than February 1, 2022.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Validating Capabilities. A. INTEGRATED PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (IPP) The Sub-Recipient shall develop and maintain an Integrated Preparedness Program (IPP) that identifies a combination of exercises and associated training requirements that address priorities and build gaps identified in the Integrated Preparedness Program Workshop (IPPW) and builds from training gaps identified in the county assessment process. The IPP is designed to consolidate the training and exercise that will be undertaken by any and all stakeholders within the State of Florida in an effort to maximize opportunities to coordinate, collaborate, and improve effectiveness of each stakeholder’s (the Whole Community) capacity/capability when responding or assisting in the response to, recovery from, and mitigation of impacts from any of the “All Hazards” threats. Training and exercises play a crucial role in this strategy, providing the State with a means of attaining, practicing, validating, and improving core capabilities.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Validating Capabilities. A. MULTI-YEAR TRAINING AND EXERCISE (MYTEP) The Sub-Recipient shall develop and maintain a Multi-Year Training Exercise Plan (MYTEP) that identifies a combination of exercises and associated training requirements that address priorities and build gaps identified in the Training and Exercise Plan Workshop (TEPW) and builds from training gaps identified in the county assessment process. The MYTEP is designed to consolidate the training and exercise that will be undertaken by any and all stakeholders within the State of Florida in an effort to maximize opportunities to coordinate, collaborate, and improve effectiveness of each stakeholder’s (the Whole Community) capacity/capability when responding or assisting in the response to, recovery from, and mitigation of impacts from any of the “All Hazards” threats. Training and exercises play a crucial role in this strategy, providing the State with a means of attaining, practicing, validating, and improving core capabilities.
Sample 1Sample 2
Validating Capabilities. Grantees should develop long-term training and exercise priorities that examine, validate and/or address the gaps identified through their annual THIRA and SPR by developing a multi-year Training and Exercise Plan (TEP). A TEP that is developed from a Training and Exercise Planning Workshop (TEPW) provides a roadmap to accomplish the multi-year priorities identified by elected and appointed officials and whole community stakeholders. These priorities help curriculum and exercise planners design and develop a progressive program of training and exercises that build, sustain, and deliver core capabilities. In addition to training activities aligned to and addressed in the TEP, all EMPG Program funded personnel shall complete the following training requirements and record and maintain proof of completion:  National Incident Management System (NIMS) Training, IS 100, IS 200, IS 700, and IS 800, and  Other Independent Study courses identified in FEMA Professional Development Series. Previous versions of the IS courses meet the NIMS training requirement. All EMPG funded personnel shall participate in no fewer than three exercises in a 12-month period (identified by Ohio EMA as July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018). Sub-recipients are responsible for tracking EMPG funded employees’ participation in exercises to be documented on both the work plan and a locally created exercise tracking checklist. A progressive, multi-year exercise program enables organizations to participate in a series of increasingly complex exercises, with each successive exercise building upon the previous one while also taking into account prior lessons learned. Regardless of the exercise type, each exercise within the progressive series is linked to a set of common program priorities and designed to test associated capabilities.
Sample 1
Validating Capabilities. Recipients should develop long-term training and exercise priorities that examine, validate and/or address capability targets identified through their annual THIRA and or capability gaps identified through their annual SPR. Recipients should also review and consider areas for improvement identified from real-world events and exercises, and national areas for improvement identified in the most recent National Preparedness Report when developing exercise priorities. The Training and Exercise Program (TEP) should consider the risks and capability requirements described in the THIRA along with the guidance provided by elected and appointed officials to identify and set training and exercise program priorities and develop a multi-year schedule of exercise events and supporting training activities to meet those priorities. A TEP that is developed from a Training and Exercise Planning Workshop (TEPW) provides a roadmap to accomplish the multi-year priorities identified by elected and appointed officials and whole community stakeholders. These priorities help curriculum and exercise planners design and develop a progressive program of training and exercises that build, sustain, and increase the ability to deliver core capabilities. Information related to TEPs and TEPWs can be found on the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) website at xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/exercise.
Sample 1

Related to Validating Capabilities

  • Testing Capabilities 7.2.2.10.2.1 LIS Acceptance Testing is provided where equipment is available, with the following test lines: seven-digit access to balance (100 type), milliwatt (102 type), nonsynchronous or synchronous, automatic transmission measuring (105 type), data transmission (107 type), loop-around, short circuit, open circuit, and non-inverting digital loop-back (108 type), and such other acceptance testing that may be needed to ensure that the service is operational and meets the applicable technical parameters.

  • Personnel Capabilities The Applicant should list down personnel of minimum qualification as specified in the Qualification Criteria

  • Packet Switching Capability 4.5.1 The packet switching capability network element is defined as the function of routing or forwarding packets, frames, cells or other data units based on address or other routing information contained in the packets, frames, cells or other data units.

  • Capabilities A. The Parties agree that the DRE must possess the legal, technical, and financial capacity to:

  • Local Circuit Switching Capability, including Tandem Switching Capability 4.2.1 Local circuit switching capability is defined as: (A) line-side facilities, which include, but are not limited to, the connection between a loop termination at a main distribution frame and a switch line card; (B) trunk-side facilities, which include, but are not limited to, the connection between trunk termination at a trunk-side cross-connect panel and a switch trunk card; (C) switching provided by remote switching modules; and (D) all features, functions, and capabilities of the switch, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the basic switching function of connecting lines to lines, line to trunks, trunks to lines, and trunks to trunks, as well as the same basic capabilities made available to BellSouth’s customers, such as a telephone number, white page listings, and dial tone; and (2) all other features that the switch is capable of providing, including but not limited to customer calling, customer local area signaling service features, and Centrex, as well as any technically feasible customized routing functions provided by the switch. Any features that are not currently available but are technically feasible through the switch can be requested through the BFR/NBR process.

  • Inputs 921 The following resources constitute a suitable, but neither exhaustive nor normative suite of the process inputs:

  • Repair Testing At the time of repair of a LIS trunk group, at no additional charge, tests will be performed to ensure that the service is operational and meets the applicable technical parameters.

  • SPECIALIZED SERVICE REQUIREMENTS In the event that the Participating Entity requires service or specialized performance requirements not addressed in this Contract (such as e- commerce specifications, specialized delivery requirements, or other specifications and requirements), the Participating Entity and the Supplier may enter into a separate, standalone agreement, apart from this Contract. Sourcewell, including its agents and employees, will not be made a party to a claim for breach of such agreement.

  • Operational Flexibility Each designated airline may, on any or all flights and at its option:

  • Hardware and Software Requirements In order to access and retain Disclosures electronically, you must satisfy the following computer hardware and software requirements: access to the Internet; an email account and related software capable of receiving email through the Internet; a web browser which is SSL-compliant and supports secure sessions, and hardware capable of running this software.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.