Validation of Annual Evaluation Summary Form Sample Clauses

Validation of Annual Evaluation Summary Form. The teacher shall receive the teacher’s annual evaluation summary form during a meeting with their building principal prior to the last five (5) working days of the school year. All sections of the Annual Evaluation Summary Form must be completed, with the exception of the Student Growth and Achievement section and the Overall rating, prior to the last five (5) working days of the school year. However, if a teacher’s overall rating will be less than effective, the principal shall schedule a conference with that teacher. Whenever a principal indicates a rating of “unsatisfactory” on any subsection of the Annual Evaluation Summary Form, they shall describe the deficiency. Any Annual Evaluation Summary Form that receives an overall “unsatisfactory” rating shall require the principal to develop a professional development plan in conjunction with the teacher. The teacher will sign the completed Annual Summary Evaluation Form upon receipt and will receive a copy for his/her personal records. A teacher’s signature is evidence that he/she has read the report, but this does not necessarily signify agreement. In the “Comments” section, a teacher may state that he/she disagrees if this is the case, and may attach a written rebuttal. Any teacher may attach additional information or comments to the form. Any such additions must be attached to the original form and kept on file. An appeals process shall be developed by the joint EPIC committee to address the PGPs, Student Growth and Achievement scores and Evaluation Instrument Rating.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Validation of Annual Evaluation Summary Form

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Finalization of Evaluation A Written Report 1 Before the evaluation cycle is final, and not later than May 10, a copy of the formal written evaluation report shall be given to the teacher and a conference shall be held between the teacher and the evaluator.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.