Evaluation Summary. The Xxxx will prepare a summary of the evaluation components above, adding in relevant employment information that s/he has observed during the time since the part-time faculty member’s prior evaluation. The Part-Time Evaluation Summary Report form (see Appendix …) will be used for this purpose and will be completed and provided to the part-time faculty member no later than the end of the semester/term. The completed student evaluation forms will not be available to the part-time faculty member at that time, but they will be available, in their entirety, one week after the end of the semester/term. In the Part-Time Evaluation Summary Report, the Xxxx will identify the evaluation as being in one of three categories: satisfactory, less than satisfactory (no impact on re-employment preference), or unsatisfactory. For evaluations that are categorized as less than satisfactory or as unsatisfactory, the summary will include information about what improvements should be made to result in a satisfactory evaluation. For part-time faculty in their third year, the summary must include a statement indicating whether re-employment preference has been granted (see Re-Employment Preference article for more information). For part-time faculty in his/her first year and those who are being considered for re-employment preference, the Xxxx will arrange an individual conference with the part-time faculty member to review the Summary Report and answer questions. In cases in which an individual conference is not required, the part-time faculty member may still request a conference with the Xxxx to discuss the evaluation.
Evaluation Summary. 9.7.1 All final evaluation conferences for permanent, temporary, and probationary (year one) unit members shall be completed by May 1. All final evaluation conferences for probationary (year two) unit members shall be completed by March 1. The evaluator shall transmit a copy to the unit member thirty (30) days prior to the end of the school year and the original to the Superintendent's office to be filed in the unit member's personnel file. Copies must be signed by the evaluator and the evaluatee.
Evaluation Summary. An employee who has completed at least three (3) years of continuous service with the district and who receives a formal written evaluation that concludes that the employee’s performance is in part or, overall unsatisfactory may file a grievance alleging that the evaluation is incomplete, inaccurate, or unjust. The timelines and procedures of Article XV shall apply.
Evaluation Summary. Proposals will be prioritized based on the categories described below. Note: Only shortlisted Offerors will be evaluated and receive points for Interviews. Evaluation Category Points Past Performance Information (Firm, Primary Subcontractor, Project Manager & Systems Engineer) 50 Risk Assessment Plan 175 Value Assessment Plan 125 Interviews (Project Manager & Systems Engineer) 300 Bundling Incentive 50 Alaska Offeror Preference 100 Price 200 Total 1,000
Evaluation Summary. Before the 1st of April, all evaluations for teachers on cycle should be completed, signed and a copy forwarded to Human Resources. If a non-probationary Employee does not agree with the evaluator’s summative evaluation, the Employee may request a review of his/her performance utilizing a team approach. This request must be made in writing to the evaluator within five (5) school days of receipt of the summative evaluation. The review team shall consist of the evaluator and a Xxxxxxxx School District administrator mutually agreed upon by the Employee and the evaluator. If mutual agreement cannot be reached, the Superintendent or his/her designee shall appoint the administrator for the team review. After the review the Employee may grieve the evaluation. The evaluation will be sustained unless it is not based on evaluation criteria, the procedures of this article, or is without basis in fact.
Evaluation Summary. Select ratings for overall job performance from choices given by considering all of the work factors from Sections I and II. Supervisor comments are required if the overall job performance level is unsatisfactory. Employee should answer the questions pertaining to discussion of position description and performance dimensions to be evaluated.
Evaluation Summary. 3.4.1.1 Stakeholders Stakeholder Interest in experiment/trial outcome VoD service provider Evaluate the viability of a FLAME-based infrastructure to better deliver service within the Smart City VoD technology provider Tune and enhance the XXX application platform for VoD to work in Smart Cities Smart City infrastructure owner Evaluate feasibility and prepare infrastructure for a service offering of that kind End users/experimenters Benefit of personalized media streaming services
