VISIBILITY STUDY Sample Clauses

VISIBILITY STUDY. See Location Sketch (Page 3) Train Speed 60 MPH Roadway Speed 55 MPH Required Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) Along Roadway 520 FEET Along Tracks 647 FEET Reqd. Clearing Sight Dist. (CSD) (Along Tracks) 1441 FEET Distances calculated per American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2001, Fourth Edition. QUADRANT CSD (FT) OBSTRUCTION SSD (FT) OBSTRUCTION SE Brush 400 Trees NW Brush 50 Mature Crops SW Brush 100 Trees NE Brush 50 Mature Crops *Note: Automatic flashing light signals and gates (AFLSG) eliminate the need to satisfy minimum Sight Distance criteria. APPROACH GRADES: See Location Sketch (Page 3) DIRECTION/West DIRECTION/East DISTANCE (FT) ELEVATION (FT) GRADE (%) DISTANCE (FT) ELEVATION (FT) GRADE (%) 0 100’ --- 0 100’ --- Distance measured from outermost rail. COMMENTS: See Page 3 for a Location Sketch (Aerial Photo) of the crossing. Staff recommends that the GCPF be used to reimburse CSX 95% of the cost to replace existing Crossbuck/YIELD signs with automatic flashing lights signals & gates, event recorder, remote monitor, and track circuits, and that the CSX pay all remaining installation costs. Staff recommends that the CSX be responsible for all future maintenance and operating costs for the new automatic warning devices. Staff also recommends that the GCPF be used to reimburse South Xxxx Township Road District 100% of the costs to reconstruct the roadway approach grades to meet the minimum requirements of 92 Ill. Ad. Code 1535.204. Staff recommends that the South Xxxx Township should also be responsible for all future maintenance costs associated with the new roadway approaches. The County will be acting as South Xxxx Township’s project manager, and as such has been included as a signatory to this agreement at IDOT’s request. Reflect Xbuck
Sample 1See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
VISIBILITY STUDY. See Location Sketch Train Speed (Maximum) 60 MPH Roadway Speed 30 MPH Required Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) Along Roadway 220 FEET Along Tracks 610 FEET Required Clearing Sight Distance (CSD) (Along Tracks) 1528 FEET Distances calculated per American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2001, Fourth Edition. QUADRANT CSD (FT) OBSTRUCTION SSD (FT) OBSTRUCTION NE * Good * Crops NW * Good * Good SE * Good * Trees & Brush SW * Good * Good *Note: The installation of automatic flashing light signals and gates eliminates the need to satisfy minimum Stopping Sight Distance – Along the Tracks and Clearing Sight Distance criteria. APPROACH GRADES: See Location Sketch DIRECTION: NORTH DIRECTION: SOUTH DISTANCE (FT) ELEVATION (FT) GRADE (%) DISTANCE (FT) ELEVATION (FT) GRADE (%) 0 100.0 --- 0 100.0 --- Please See Exhibit A Page 3 Distance measured from outermost rail. COMMENTS: PROPOSED COST DIVISION IMPROVEMENT GCPF TOWNSHIP ICRR SIGNALS 95% 0% 5%1 APPROACH 100% 0% 0%
Sample 1
VISIBILITY STUDY. See Location Sketch (Page 3) Train Speed MPH Roadway Speed MPH Required Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) Along Roadway FEET Along Tracks FEET Reqd. Clearing Sight Dist. (CSD) (Along Tracks) FEET Distances calculated per American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2001, Fourth Edition. QUADRANT CSD (FT) OBSTRUCTION SSD (FT) OBSTRUCTION NE NW SE SW 50 Trees *Note: Automatic flashing light signals and gates (AFLSG) eliminate the need to satisfy minimum Sight Distance criteria. APPROACH GRADES: See Location Sketch (Page 3) DIRECTION/West DIRECTION/East DISTANCE (FT) ELEVATION (FT) GRADE (%) DISTANCE (FT) ELEVATION (FT) GRADE (%) 0 100’ --- 0 100’ --- Distance measured from outermost rail. COMMENTS: See Page 3 for a Location Sketch (Aerial Photo) of the crossing. Staff recommends that the GCPF be used pay 95% of the cost to replace existing automatic flashing light signals (AFLS) with new automatic flashing lights signals & gates (AFLSG), event recorder, remote monitor, and track circuits, and that the UP pay all remaining installation costs. Staff also recommends that the UP be responsible for all future maintenance and operating costs for the new automatic warning devices. SA 2145 Exh. A, Page 3 Material And Force Account Estimate ICC Estimate Creation Date: 03/01/2021 Number: 133128 Version: 1 Estimate Good Until 03/02/22 Location: ROCK ISLAND IND LD, INDL, 0-1.27 Buy America: Yes Description of Work: BELVIDERE, IL, SOUTH APPLETON ROAD, M.P. 79.44, ROCKFORD INDUSTRIAL LEAD, DOT#174475X, WO#57983, PID#116795, 95% ICC / 5% UPRR) COMMENTS Description QTY UOM Unit LABOR MATERIAL TOTAL UP 05% Agncy 95% Cost SIGNAL Xing - Engineering Design 1 LS 3,734.00 3,734 0 3,734 187 3,547 Xing - 1 Trk CWE w/Gates 1 EA 131,584.00 41,200 90,384 131,584 6,579 125,005 Xing - CAR14/24 (IL) 1 LS 6,482.00 3,840 2,642 6,482 324 6,158 Xing - Install Web and Head Bonds per 1000 TF 2 EA 1,865.00 3,200 530 3,730 187 3,544 Xing - Meter Service 1 LS 20,000.00 0 20,000 20,000 1,000 19,000 Xing - Fill/Rock/Gravel 1 LS 8,000.00 0 8,000 8,000 400 7,600 Xing - Boring 1 LS 10,000.00 0 10,000 10,000 500 9,500 MIPP-C SERVICES Xing - Misc. 1 LS 10,000.00 0 10,000 10,000 500 9,500 Xing - Remove Location 1 LS 2,000.00 2,000 0 2,000 100 1,900 FEDERAL W/O 110.43% (SIG) Xing - Labor Additive 1 LS 59,603.49 59,603 0 59,603 2,980 56,623 Sub-Total = 113,577 141,556 255,133 12,757 242,377 Totals = 113,577 141,556 255,133 12...
Sample 1

Related to VISIBILITY STUDY

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Development Area 10.4. The Development Area shall encompass all Deposits to be produced.

  • System Impact Study An assessment by the Transmission Provider of (i) the adequacy of the Transmission System to accommodate a Completed Application, an Interconnection Request or an Upgrade Request, (ii) whether any additional costs may be incurred in order to provide such transmission service or to accommodate an Interconnection Request, and (iii) with respect to an Interconnection Request, an estimated date that an Interconnection Customer’s Customer Facility can be interconnected with the Transmission System and an estimate of the Interconnection Customer’s cost responsibility for the interconnection; and (iv) with respect to an Upgrade Request, the estimated cost of the requested system upgrades or expansion, or of the cost of the system upgrades or expansion, necessary to provide the requested incremental rights.

  • Study Area The study area focused on the Bulk Power System in South-Eastern New York between Albany and New York City, and voltages underlying systems at 115 kV and above in the lower Xxxxxx Valley (Zones G, H & I). In the PSS™E power flow base case provided by NYISO, facilities rated at 115 kV and above in PSS™E designated areas 6 through 11 are monitored in the study. These areas are: • Capital District • Xxxxxx • Millwood • Xxxxxxxxx • Con Ed • Long Island

  • Development Phase contractual phase initiated with the approval of ANP for the Development Plan and which is extended during the Production Phase while investments in xxxxx, equipment, and facilities for the Production of Oil and Gas according to the Best Practices of the Oil Industry are required.

  • Study Population The study was based at the San Francisco KPNC Anal Cancer Screening Clinic. We enrolled men who were identified as positive for HIV through the Kaiser HIV registry, who were aged ≥ 18 years, who were not diag- nosed with anal cancer before enrollment, and who pro- vided informed consent. In total, 363 men were enrolled between August 2009 and June 2010. The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards at KPNC and at the National Cancer Institute. All partici- pants were asked to complete a self-administered ques- tionnaire to collect risk factor information. Additional information regarding HIV status and medication, sexu- ally transmitted diseases, and histopathology results were abstracted from the KPNC clinical database. For 87 of the 271 subjects without biopsy-proven AIN2 or AIN3 at the time of enrollment, follow-up infor- mation concerning outcomes from additional clinic visits up to December 2011 was available and included in the analysis to correct for the possible imperfect sensitivity of high-resolution anoscopy (HRA).13,15 Clinical Examination, Evaluation, and Results During the clinical examination, 2 specimens were col- lected by inserting a wet flocked nylon swab16 into the anal canal up to the distal rectal vault and withdrawing with rotation and lateral pressure. Both specimens were trans- ferred to PreservCyt medium (Hologic, Bedford, Mass). A third specimen was collected for routine testing for Chla- mydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea. After specimen collection, participants underwent a digital anorectal ex- amination followed by HRA. All lesions that appeared sus- picious on HRA were biopsied and sent for routine histopathological review by KPNC pathologists, and were subsequently graded as condyloma or AIN1 through AIN3. No cancers were observed in this study population. From the first specimen, a ThinPrep slide (Hologic) was prepared for routine Xxxxxxxxxxxx staining and xxxxx- xxxxx. Two pathologists (T.D. and D.T.) reviewed the slides independently. Cytology results were reported anal- ogous to the Bethesda classification17 for cervical cytology except when otherwise noted. The following categories were used: negative for intraepithelial lesion or malig- xxxxx (NILM); ASC-US; atypical squamous cells cannot rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (ASC-H); low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL); HSIL, favor AIN2 (HSIL-AIN2); and HSIL-AIN3. ASC-H, HSIL-AIN2, and HSIL-AIN3 were combined into a single high-grade cytology category for the current analysis. Biomarker Testing Using the residual specimen from the first collection, mtm Laboratories AG (Heidelberg, Germany) performed the p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (‘‘p16/Ki-67 staining’’) using their CINtec Plus cytology kit according to their specifications. A ThinPrep 2000 processor (Holo- gic) was used to prepare a slide, which then was stained according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The CINtec Plus cytology kit was then applied to the unstained cytol- ogy slide for p16/Ki-67 staining. On the second collected specimen, Roche Molecular Systems (Pleasanton, Calif) tested for HR-HPV, includ- ing separate detection of HPV-16, and HPV-18 DNA, using their cobas 4800 HPV test. To prepare DNA for the cobas test, automated sample extraction was per- formed as follows: 500 lL of the PreservCyt specimen was pipetted into a secondary tube (Falcon 5-mL polypropyl- ene round-bottom tube, which measured 12-mm-by-75- mm and was nonpyrogenic and sterile). The tube was capped, mixed by vortexing, uncapped, placed on the x-480 specimen rack, and loaded onto the x-480 sample extraction module of the cobas 4800 system. The x-480 extraction module then inputs 400 lL of this material into the specimen preparation process. The extracted DNA was then tested as previously described.16 NorChip AS (Klokkarstua, Norway) also tested the second specimen for HPV-16, -18, -31, -33, and -45 HPV E6/E7 mRNA using their PreTect HPV-Proofer assay according to their specifications. All testing was per- formed masked to the results of the other assays, clinical outcomes, and patient characteristics.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.