Voting Protocols Sample Clauses

Voting Protocols a. Each voting member may cast one vote on all questions, orders, resolutions, and ordinances coming before the board of directors. b. A majority of all voting members of the board of directors are a quorum for the transaction of business. c. The affirmative vote of a majority of all voting members present at any meeting at which a quorum is present shall be necessary and, except as otherwise provided, is sufficient to carry a motion, resolution, ordinance, or proposition before the board of directors. d. After a vote of members is taken, a weighted vote may be called by the voting members of any three jurisdictions. e. When applicable, votes shall be weighted as follows: Tier I Oklahoma City (1) 1 26% Tier I Oklahoma City (2) 1 26% Tier II Norman 1 14% Tier II Edmond 1 14% Tier III Moore 1 6.6% Tier III Midwest City 1 6.6% Tier III Del City 1 6.6% f. The following matters require approval by a 67% weighted vote: • Pledge assets • Approve budget • Major service change • Determine tax rate to be placed on ballot • Call for the governing bodies of the municipalities comprising the Authority to put a referendum on ballot g. A motion to approve the acquisition, construction, or operation of a rail line must receive the affirmative vote of 67% of the weighted vote including a majority of representatives of member cities through which the rail line traverses. h. A motion to approve the acquisition of a transit provider and associated liability and assets must receive the affirmative vote of 67% of the weighted vote including a majority of representatives of member cities in the service area. i. A motion to issue debt must receive the affirmative vote of 67% of the weighted vote. In addition, the indebtedness must be approved by a 2/3 vote of the governing body of 2/3 of the Beneficiaries of the Trust; provided, however, that a municipal beneficiary with a governing body consisting of fewer than seven members shall be required to approve the issuance of debt by a 3/5 vote of the governing body. j. After each decennial census beginning in 2030, the governing boards of the Beneficiaries shall review the apportionment of the board of directors and associated voting protocols to make such adjustments, if any, as may be appropriate to account equitably for the population and sales tax distribution among the member jurisdictions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Voting Protocols. A majority of the membership of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Approval of proposed actions requires a simple majority vote of the full Board of Directors except as provided herein.
Voting Protocols. A majority of the membership of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Approval of proposed actions requires a minimum of four (4) affirmative votes, except as provided herein. The following actions shall require a supermajority: (i) initiation of litigation in the name of the Agency, , (ii) adoption or amendment of the Agency’s Bylaws; (iii) amendments to the Agency’s Qualifying Region; (iv) admission of any new Party to the Agency; (iv) expulsion of any Party which is not in default of this Agreement and not in violation of the ordinances, policies, resolutions, rules or regulations of the Alliance. The following actions shall require unanimous consent: (i) issuance of bonds or other form of indebtedness obligating the Agency for an amount in excess of $75,000; (ii) disproportionate allocation of costs as articulated in Article 15.
Voting Protocols. A majority of the membership of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business (e.g., four present members of the seven member Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum). Approval of proposed actions requires a simple majority vote of the Board of Directors present at a meeting of the Board of Directors except as provided herein. Any action which would affect any one of the Authority's Insurance Programs shall additionally require the affirmative vote of a majority of those Board of Directors members who represent the Party participating in that Insurance Program. Enactment of any of the Board of Directors actions enumerated below shall require a supermajority vote of the Board of Directors. A supermajority is five of the seven members of the Board of Directors regardless of the number of voting members who are present at the Board of Directors meeting. Matters subject to supermajority vote are:

Related to Voting Protocols

  • Voting Procedures Subject to the cost allocation procedures set forth in Section 3 hereof, LIFE COMPANY will distribute all proxy material furnished by AVIF to Participants to whom pass-through voting privileges are required to be extended and will solicit voting instructions from Participants. LIFE COMPANY will vote Shares in accordance with timely instructions received from Participants. LIFE COMPANY will vote Shares that are (a) not attributable to Participants to whom pass-through voting privileges are extended, or (b) attributable to Participants, but for which no timely instructions have been received, in the same proportion as Shares for which said instructions have been received from Participants, so long as and to the extent that the SEC continues to interpret the 1940 Act to require pass through voting privileges for Participants. Neither LIFE COMPANY nor any of its affiliates will in any way recommend action in connection with or oppose or interfere with the solicitation of proxies for the Shares held for such Participants. LIFE COMPANY reserves the right to vote shares held in any Account in its own right, to the extent permitted by law. LIFE COMPANY shall be responsible for assuring that each of its Accounts holding Shares calculates voting privileges in a manner consistent with that of other Participating Insurance Companies or in the manner required by the Mixed and Shared Funding exemptive order obtained by AVIF. AVIF will notify LIFE COMPANY of any changes of interpretations or amendments to Mixed and Shared Funding exemptive order it has obtained. AVIF will comply with all provisions of the 1940 Act requiring voting by shareholders, and in particular, AVIF either will provide for annual meetings (except insofar as the SEC may interpret Section 16 of the 1940 Act not to require such meetings) or will comply with Section 16(c) of the 1940 Act (although AVIF is not one of the trusts described in Section 16(c) of that Act) as well as with Sections 16(a) and, if and when applicable, 16(b). Further, AVIF will act in accordance with the SEC's interpretation of the requirements of Section 16 (a) with respect to periodic elections of directors and with whatever rules the SEC may promulgate with respect thereto.

  • Voting Procedure The Trust shall be authorized to solicit, and a Shareholder shall be entitled to submit a proxy ballot containing the voting instructions of such Shareholder, in person, or by U.S. mail, overnight mail, express mail, telephone, electronic mail, telefacsimile, telegraph, internet or other electronic media, provided however, that the Sponsor or an officer of the Trust may limit or delineate the types of media and methods by which a Shareholder may submit voting instructions. On any matter any Shareholder may vote part of the shares in favor of the proposal and refrain from voting the remaining shares or vote them against the proposal, but if the Shareholder fails to specify the number of shares which the Shareholder is voting affirmatively, it will be conclusively presumed that the Shareholder’s approving vote is with respect to the total shares that the Shareholder is entitled to vote on such proposal.

  • Protocols Each party hereby agrees that the inclusion of additional protocols may be required to make this Agreement specific. All such protocols shall be negotiated, determined and agreed upon by both parties hereto.

  • Protocol The attached Protocol shall be an integral part of this Agreement.

  • Signaling protocol The Parties will interconnect their networks using SS7 signaling where Technically Feasible and available as defined in GR 905 Telcordia Standards including ISDN User Part (ISUP) for trunk signaling and TCAP for CCS-based features in the Interconnection of their networks. All Network Operations Forum (NOF) adopted standards shall be adhered to. Where available, CenturyLink signaling services to link its Signaling Transfer Points (STPs) for CLEC switches which connect to CenturyLink’s STPs via “A” links or for CLEC’s STPs to connect to CenturyLink’s STPs via “D” links which are dedicated to the transport of signaling for local Interconnection, may be ordered from the CenturyLink Tariff.

  • Voting Provisions As a condition precedent to entering into this Agreement, at the request of the Company, Purchaser shall become a party to any voting agreement to which the Company is a party at the time of Purchaser’s execution and delivery of this Agreement, as such voting agreement may be thereafter amended from time to time (the “Voting Agreement”), by executing an adoption agreement or counterpart signature page agreeing to be bound by and subject to the terms of the Voting Agreement and to vote the Shares in the capacity of a “Common Holder” and a “Stockholder,” as such terms may be defined in the Voting Agreement.

  • Policies and Procedures i) The policies and procedures of the designated employer apply to the employee while working at both sites. ii) Only the designated employer shall have exclusive authority over the employee in regard to discipline, reporting to the College of Nurses of Ontario and/or investigations of family/resident complaints. iii) The designated employer will ensure that the employee is covered by WSIB at all times, regardless of worksite, while in the employ of either home. iv) The designated employer will ensure that the employee is covered by liability insurance at all times, regardless of worksite, while in the employ of either home. v) The designated employer shall have exclusive authority over the employee’s personnel files and health records. These files will be maintained on the site of the designated employer.

  • Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By October 31, 2017, the School will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly-added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the School to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the School, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternates are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the School’s online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the School will officially adopt, and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.

  • Hearing Procedures The hearing shall be held at the earliest convenient date, taking into consideration the established schedule of the Board or hearing officer and the availability of the CSEA representative, counsel and witnesses. The parties shall be notified of the time and place of the hearing after ensuring availability of all necessary parties. The employee shall be entitled to appear personally, produce evidence, and have CSEA representation. The employee shall be entitled to a public hearing if he/she demands it when the Board is hearing the appeal. 18.12.1 The complainant may also be represented by counsel. The procedure entitled "Administrative Adjudication" commencing with Government Code 11500 shall not apply to any such hearing before the Board or a hearing officer. Neither the Board nor a hearing officer shall be bound by rules of evidence used in California courts. Informality in any such hearing shall not invalidate any order or decision made or approved by the hearing officer or the Board. 18.12.2 All hearings shall be heard by a hearing officer (who shall be an attorney licensed in the State of California) except in those cases where the Board determines to hear the appeal itself. In any case in which the Board hears the appeal, the Board may use the services of its counsel or a hearing officer in ruling upon procedural questions, objections to evidence, and issues of law. However, the Board must employ separate counsel from the one presenting the case for the complainant. 18.12.3 If the appeal is heard by the Board, the Board shall affirm, modify or revoke the recommended personnel action. 18.12.4 If the appeal is heard by a hearing officer, he/she shall prepare a proposed decision in a form that may be adopted by the Board as the decision in the case. A copy of the proposed decision shall be received and filed by the Board and furnished to each party within ten days after the proposed decision is filed by the Board. After furnishing the proposed decision to each party, the Board may: 18.1.4.1 Adopt the proposed decision in its entirety. 18.1.4.2 Reduce the personnel action set forth in the proposed decision and adopt the balance of the proposed decision. 18.1.4.3 Reject a proposed reduction in personnel action, approve the disciplinary action sought by the complainant or any lesser penalty, and adopt the balance of the proposed decision. 18.1.4.4 Reject the proposed decision in its entirety. 18.12.5 If the Board rejects the proposed decision in its entirety, each party shall be notified of such action and the Board may decide the case upon the record including the transcript, with or without the taking of additional evidence, or may refer the case to the same or another hearing officer to take additional evidence. If the case is so assigned to a hearing officer, he/she shall prepare a proposed decision, as provided in item Section 18.12.4 above, upon the additional evidence and the transcript and other papers which are part of the record of the prior hearing. A copy of this proposed decision shall be furnished to each party within 10 days after the proposed decision is filed by the Board. 18.12.6 In arriving at a decision or a proposed decision on the propriety of the proposed disciplinary action, the Board or the hearing officer may consider the records of any prior disciplinary action proceedings against the employee in which a disciplinary action was ultimately sustained and any records that were contained in the employee's personnel files and introduced into evidence at the hearing.

  • Testing Procedures Testing will be conducted by an outside certified Agency in such a way to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability by using the techniques, chain of custody procedures, equipment and laboratory facilities which have been approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. All employees notified of a positive controlled substance or alcohol test result may request an independent test of their split sample at the employee’s expense. If the test result is negative the Employer will reimburse the employee for the cost of the split sample test.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!