Xxx et al. Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-00328-N (N.D. Tex.) (the “Xxxxxxx Litigation”), or Xxxxx, et al. v. Independent Bank, et al., Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-00675 (S.D. Tex.) (the “Xxxxx Litigation”) (the Rostain Litigation, the Xxxxxxx Litigation, and the Xxxxx Litigation are referred to collectively herein as the “Litigation”). PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Movants have filed an Expedited Request for Entry of Scheduling Order and Motion to Approve Proposed Settlement with Trustmark, to Approve the Proposed Notice of Settlement with Trustmark, to Enter the Bar Order, and to Enter the Rule 54(b) Final Judgment and Bar Order (the “Motion”), filed in SEC x. Xxxxxxxx Int’l Bank, Trustmark Settlement Exhibit A Ltd., No. 3:09-cv-0298-N (N.D. Tex.) (the “SEC Action”). Copies of the Settlement Agreement, the Motion, and other supporting papers may be obtained from the Court’s docket in the SEC Action (ECF No. ), and are also available on the websites of the Receiver (xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx) and the Examiner (xxx.xxx-xxx.xxx/xxxxxxxx- stanford-financial-group/). Copies of these documents may also be requested by email, by sending the request to Xxxx Xxxxxxxx at xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx; or by telephone, by calling (000) 000-0000. All capitalized terms not defined in this Notice of Settlement and Bar Order Proceedings are defined in the Settlement Agreement, attached as Exhibit 1 of the Appendix to the Motion. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Motion requests that the Court approve the Settlement and enter a bar order permanently enjoining, among others, Interested Parties,1 including Stanford Xxxxxxxxx,0 Xxxxxxxxxx,0 Xxxxxxxxx,0 and Joint Liquidators5 from pursuing Settled Claims,6 including claims you may possess, against Trustmark.
Xxx et al. (2018) estimated that there were 425 million cases of diabetes (8.8%) among adults aged 20–79 years in 2017. When the age range was extended to 18–99 years, this figure increased to 451 million (8.4%). However, by 2045, it is estimated that diabetes will affect 629 million people in the age group 20–79 years (9.9%), and 693 million in the age range 18–99 years (9.9%). Diabetes prevalence varies by age group, gender, World Bank income group, and geographical region. Xxx et al.,(2018) found that diabetes prevalence peaks at 22% in the 75–79 age group in high-income countries, at 19% in the 60–74 age group in middle-income countries and at 8% among the 55–64 age group in low-income countries. Diabetes prevalence is threefold greater in high-income countries than in low-income countries among 65–69-year-olds.
Xxx et al. Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-0328 (N.D. Tex.) (the “Xxxxxxx Litigation” brought by individual plaintiffs herein referred to collectively as the “Xxxxxxx Investor Plaintiffs”) arise from a series of events leading to the collapse of Stanford International Bank, Ltd. (“SIBL”) and other companies owned or controlled by Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx (with SIBL, the “Stanford Entities”).2 On February 16, 2009, this Court appointed Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx to be the Receiver for the Stanford Entities. (ECF No. 10). After years of investigation, the Plaintiffs believe that they have identified claims against a number of third parties, including Trustmark, which Plaintiffs allege enabled the Stanford Ponzi scheme. In the Rotstain Litigation, the plaintiffs assert claims against Trustmark and other defendants for (1) aiding, abetting, or participation in violations of the Texas Securities
Xxx et al. 2007]. The generally enhanced availability of remote sensing data after major events may thereby provide a good starting point for sustainable, well planned image acquisition campaigns.
Xxx et al. (Fed Ct. No. T-867-05) and Canada has appealed that judgment;
Xxx et al presented a novel approach to model and understand the relationships between customers and some web service providers [12].They attached a clear and concise definition of SLA in a highly competitive business environment where service providers are interested in gaining a good understanding of the relationship between what they could promise in an SLA and what their IT infrastructure is capable of delivering. This paper also mentioned some components of SLA such as purpose, parties, validity period, scope, SLA objectives, penalties, optional services, exclusions and administration. Finally, their research ends up with some web service composition with SLA modeling. Furthermore, they focused on information collection and analysis at the creation stages of SLAs and their result suggested that having information of impact of various service levels on business process would give SLA negotiators, human managers or automatic components, a clear picture of pros and cons of various SLOs in an SLA. This paper also introduced Dynamic service ranking concepts, which means that service providers rank its services based on customer’s real time needs. Also this ranking is done and available only for the customer who needs to sort out a web service from same service provider.
Xxx et al. DIV. ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------ DOMINION OKLAHOMA TEXAS PARTNERSHIP V. 02-02049 U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT, OPEN ENRON NORTH AMERICA, ET AL S.D. OF NEW YORK, MANHATTAN ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------ XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX, ON BEHALF OF THE ENRON H-01-4128 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, OPEN CORP. SAVINGS PLAN AND ITS PARTICIPANTS, S.D. OF TEXAS, HOUSTON PLAINTIFF, V. ENRON CORPORATION, AN DIV. OREGON CORPORATION, XXXXXX X. XXXXXX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS # ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------ XXXXXXX XXXXX, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF 2001-54069 151ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OPEN ENRON CORP., PLAINTIFF X. XXXXXX X. COURT, XXXXXX COUNTY, BELFER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND ENRON TEXAS CORP., NOMINAL DEFENDANT # ------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------------- ------------ In re: ENRON CORP. Debtor, Case No. 01-16034 Entity # 2 SOFA EXHIBIT
Xxx et al. S SCHEME In this section, we describe the various phases of X.X.Xxx et al [3] scheme, which are (i) medical server registration phase, (ii)user registration phase, (iii) login phase, (iv) authenticationand session key agreement phase. The notations used ate providedin Table 1. Table 1: Notations and their meanings Symbol Description Pi ith user/patient MRS Medical registration server MSj jth medical server (1 ≤ j ≤ m) PSk kth physician server (1 ≤ k ≤ p) PPIDi Identity of Pi PPWi Password of Pi PBi Personal biometrics of Pi MSIDj Identity of MSj PSIDk Identity of PSk KMRS Secret key of the MRS KMSj Secret key of MSj KPMjk Shared secret key between PSk and MSj RPi Random nonce generated by Pi RMSj Random nonce generated by MSj RPSk Random nonce generated by PSk TPi Current time-stamp generated by Pi TMSj Current time-stamp generated by MSj TPSk Current time-stamp generated by PSk Δt Maximum transmission delay, expected time interval for transmission delay or expected network delay time h(·) Collision-free one-way hash function H (·) Biohashing function [27, 35] Gen(·) Fuzzy extractor generation algorithm Rep(·) Fuzzy extractor reproduction algorithm σi Biometric key of Pi τi Biometric public parameter of Pi εt Error tolerance threshold P⊕Q Bitwise XORed of data P with data Q P||Q Data P concatenates with data Q The proposed scheme consists of six phases: (i) predeploymentphase, (ii) registration phase, (iii) login phase,(iv) authentication and key agreement phase, (v) passwordchange phase and (vi) dynamic node addition phase.
