Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxxxxxxx on the methods used in the assays. Neither Xx. Xxxx nor Xx. Xxxx will participate in the actual assays of the patient samples, or in the preparation of the report. The samples from the second (#003) and third (#004) patient have been collected by the Xxxx Xxxxxxx. As soon as there is approval from SLU, these samples will be sent to Xx. Xxxxxxxxxxx at SLU, and will be assayed.
Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx (Xx. Xxxx Xxx Man Xxxxx as alternate Director), and three independent non-executive Directors, namely, Mr. Ma Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xx. Xxxxxx Xxx-isres and Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx.
Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xx. X. X. Xxxxxxx, who have been identified to me as investigators with the U.S. fluclear Regulatory Comnission. .I make this statement with no threats or promises having been made. I am the plant General rianager for Automtion Industries _ .I have been Plant Manager for (10) years., I reside~' at| , Phoenixville, Penn - Around the fiovember 1980 time frame, I first became aware of the possibility that the injuries on ~ ' ' hai nd may have been due to exposure resulting from cleaning sources;; Xxxxxxx, i also thought that the injuries may have been caused from something else outside the job. Around this same time I hired a new man,( .and I took ' for the job. I subsequently (continued to checkih/aonffdopfecriloedaincainlygtososuereceifs and h it was getting better. At this time I did not know that! )was having the same problem with his hand. If I would have known for sure at this time that the flRC, b{ut I ~ just wan' t sure.' hand were definitely a result of exposure, I would On 29 January 1981,| rcame to me, showed me his hands and I told him that his hands appeared to have the same problem as did| lhands. That night I took some medical books home explaining radiation exposure. On Friday the both had ra[diation exposure. i was having problems with his hands. On Friday the 30th I called Dr. aRowgaerre (Xxxxxxxxx to set up an appointment to have him se' e(I had already drafted a letter to report the incident to i1RC and I read tN wire to Xx. Xxxxxxxxx over the phone. Xx. Xxxxxxxxx told me to hold off sending the- wire until he could look at them. I also called Xxxx (Xxxx) Xxxxxx, President of AI, Xxxxxx Division, who told me to get them the best medical attention available and confirmed that I had to report the incident to i1RC. * The changes that I made regarding the cleaning of snurces were a direct result of recommendation as to how to decrene exposure. It also increased xxx (suspicion tha't[ started about one month ago. * were a result of exposure. These changes were We had a 11RC inspection in mid-January 1981 and the reason I did not mention the puposinsitbhileitycoonfveexrpsaotsiounrewtioth[the' inspector. haInndnwo awsabyedcidauI seevethr eteqlluaensytioofn employees not to say anything about exposure to the fiRC inspectors. mwyas never . -- _ . . - -
Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xx. X. Fuchs) and the Comite National Consultaif d’Ethique (represented by Prof. Xx.
Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxxx X.
Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx petitioned the Service to list the Xxxxxx Springs salamander on January 22, 1992, and on December 11, 1992 (57 FR 58779), the Service published a notice in the Federal Register that the petitioner presented substantial information that the requested action may be warranted. A proposed rule to list the Xxxxxx Springs salamander was published in the Federal Register on February 17, 1994 (59 FR 7968). The Service held a public hearing on June 16, 1994, in Austin, Texas (59 FR 27257). On March 10, 1995, the Service published a notice extending the 1-year deadline for final action on the proposed rule until August 17, 1995, and reopened the public comment period (59 FR 27257). Reasons for the 6- month extension are provided in the March 10, 1995, Federal Register notice. On April 10, 1995, Congress enacted a moratorium prohibiting work on listing actions (Public Law 104–6) and eliminated funding for the Service to conduct final listing actions. On November 27, 1995, in response to a lawsuit from the Save Our Springs Legal Defense Fund (Save Our Springs Legal Defense Fund, Inc., et al., v. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx), a U.S. District Court invalidated the Service’s March 10, 1995, notice of extension and ruled that the Service had to make a final determination on whether to list the Xxxxxx Springs salamander within 14 days of the court order. The court granted a stay pending the Service’s appeal of the order, on the grounds that the moratorium and lack of funding prohibited the Service from making a final listing determination. The moratorium was lifted on April 26, 1996, by means of a Presidential waiver, at which time limited funding for listing actions was made available through the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1996 (Public Law No. 104–134, 100 Stat. 1321, 1996). The Service published guidance for restarting the listing program on May 16, 1996 (61 FR 24722). Due to the potential for new information during the lapse between the reinstatement of the listing program and the close of the last comment period (May 17, 1995), the Service reopened the public comment period on June 24, 1996, for 30 days. That comment period closed July 10, 1996, by U.S. District Court order. Following the Service’s decision to propose the species for listing as endangered, the City of Austin and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) formed the Aquatic Biological Assessment Team (ABAT) to conduct independent peer review of the listing proposal and to address salamand...
Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxxxxxx have shown much interest in this work and given useful comments on the final results.
Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx; and six independent non-executive directors, namely, Mr. Xx Xxxxxx Xxxx Cheung, Xx. Xxxxxx Xxx-isres, Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mrs. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx and Mr. Xxxxx Xxx Xx.
Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxxxx. The meeting mainly concerned the basic training and planning of the future activities.
Xxxxxxxxxxx and Xx. Xxxxxxxx. The first part of the training consisted of learning the basics of the Rodin Platform and building a couple of simple models with some assis- tance from Xx. Xxxxxxxx. The latter part was concentrated on a presentation of a modular model description (the Parking Lot example).
