Change in Control Related Provisions. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5, in no event shall the aggregate payments or benefits to be made or afforded to Executive under said sections (the “Termination Benefits”) constitute an “excess parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or any successor thereto, and in order to avoid such a result, Termination Benefits will be reduced, if necessary, to an amount (the “Non-Triggering Amount”), the value of which is one dollar ($1.00) less than an amount equal to the maximum amount allowable as a deduction by the Bank or Company, as determined in accordance with said Section 280G. The allocation of the reduction required hereby among the Termination Benefits provided by Section 5 shall be determined by Executive.
Change in Control Related Provisions. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5, in no event shall the aggregate payments or benefits to be made or afforded to Executive under said paragraphs (the "Termination Benefits") constitute an "excess parachute payment" under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any successor thereto, and in order to avoid such a result, Termination Benefits will be reduced, if necessary, to an amount (the "Non-Triggering Amount"), the value of which is one dollar ($1.00) less than an amount equal to three (3) times Executive's "base amount," as determined in accordance with said Section 280G. The allocation of the reduction required hereby among the Termination Benefits provided by Section 5 shall be determined by Executive.
Change in Control Related Provisions. (a) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of Section 5 of this Agreement, for any taxable year in which Executive shall be liable for the payment of an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code (or any successor provision thereto), with respect to any payment in the nature of the compensation made by the Holding Company or its subsidiaries to (or for the benefit of) Executive pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise, the Holding Company (or any successor thereto) shall pay to Executive an amount determined under the following formula: An amount equal to: (E x P) + X WHERE: X = E x P ----------------------------------------- 1 - [(FI x (1 - SLI)) + SLI + E + M + PO] E = the rate at which the excise tax is assessed under Section 4999 of the Code; P = the amount with respect to which such excise tax is assessed, determined without regard to this Section 6; FI = the highest marginal rate of federal income, employment, and other taxes (other than taxes imposed under Section 4999 of the Code) applicable to Executive for the taxable year in question (including any effective increase in Executive's tax rate attributable to the disallowance of any deduction); SLI = the sum of the highest marginal rates of income and payroll tax applicable to Executive under applicable state and local laws for the taxable year in question (including any effective increase in Executive's tax rate attributable to the disallowance of any deduction); M = highest marginal rate of Medicare tax; and PO = adjustment for phase out of or loss of deduction, personal exemption or other similar items. With respect to any payment in the nature of compensation that is made to (or for the benefit of) Executive under the terms of this Agreement or otherwise and on which an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code may or will be assessed, the payment determined under this Section 6 shall be made to Executive on the earliest of (i) the date the Holding Company is required to withhold such tax, (ii) the date the tax is required to be paid by Executive, or (iii) at the time of the Change in Control. It is the intention of the parties that the Holding Company provide Executive with a full tax gross-up under the provisions of this Section 6, so that on a net after-tax basis, the result to Executive shall be the same as if the excise tax under Section 4999 (or any successor provisions) of the Code had not been imposed. The payment may be adjusted, as appropriate, if alternative minimum tax rules under t...
Change in Control Related Provisions. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5, in no event shall the aggregate payments or benefits to be made or afforded to Executive under said paragraphs (the “Termination Benefits”) constitute an “excess parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) or any successor thereto, and in order to avoid such a result, Termination Benefits will be reduced, if necessary, to an amount (the “Non-Triggering Amount”), the value of which is one dollar ($1.00) less than an amount equal to three (3) times Executive’s “base amount”, as determined in accordance with said Section 280G. If necessary, the reduction required hereby among the Termination Benefits shall be made from the cash payments due under Section 5 of the Agreement.
Change in Control Related Provisions. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Section 5, in no event shall the aggregate payments or benefits to be made or afforded to Executive under said paragraphs (the “Termination Benefits”) constitute an “excess parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Code or any successor thereto, and in order to avoid such a result, Termination Benefits will be reduced, if necessary, to an amount, the value of which is one dollar ($1.00) less than an amount equal to three (3) times Executive’s “base amount,” as determined in accordance with said Section 280G. The allocation of the reduction required among the Termination Benefits provided by this Section 5 shall be determined by Executive, provided, however, that if such reduction violates Code Section 409A, then the reduction shall be applied to the severance benefits otherwise payable under Section 5(c) hereof.
Change in Control Related Provisions. (a) Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event it shall be determined that any payment or distribution by the Company to or for the benefit of Executive (whether paid or payable or distributed or distributable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise, but determined without regard to any additional payments required under this Section 3) (the “Termination Benefits”) would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) or any corresponding provisions of state or local tax laws, or any interest or penalties are incurred by Executive with respect to such excise tax (such excise tax, together with any such interest and penalties, are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Excise Tax”), then Executive shall be entitled to receive an additional payment (a “Gross-Up Payment”) in an amount such that after payment by Executive of all taxes (including any interest or penalties imposed with respect to such taxes), including, without limitation, any income taxes (and any interest and penalties imposed with respect thereto) and Excise Tax imposed upon the Gross-Up Payment, Executive retains an amount of the Gross-Up Payment equal to the Excise Tax imposed upon the Termination Benefits.
(b) Subject to the provisions of Section 3(c), all determinations required to be made under this Section 3, including whether and when a Gross-Up Payment is required and the amount of such Gross-Up Payment and the assumptions to be utilized in arriving at such determination, shall be made by the Company’s certified public accounting firm (the “Accounting Firm”), which shall provide detailed supporting calculations both to the Company and Executive within fifteen (15) business days of the receipt of notice from Executive that there has been Termination Benefits, or such earlier time as is requested by the Company. All fees and expenses of the Accounting Firm shall be borne solely by the Company. Any Gross-Up Payment, as determined pursuant to this Section 3, shall be paid by the Company to Executive within five business (5) days of the receipt of the Accounting Firm’s determination. Any determination by the Accounting Firm shall be binding upon the Company and Executive. As a result of the uncertainty in the application of Section 4999 of the Code at the time of the initial determination by the Accounting Firm hereunder, it is possible that Gross-Up Payments which will not have been mad...
Change in Control Related Provisions. (a) Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding and except as set forth below, in the event it shall be determined that any payment, benefit or distribution made or provided by the Holding Company or the Institution to or for the benefit of Executive (whether made or provided pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or otherwise) (each referred to herein as a “Payment”), would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) or any interest or penalties are incurred by Executive with respect to such excise tax (the excise tax, together with any such interest and penalties, are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Excise Tax”), Executive shall be entitled to receive an additional payment (a “Gross-Up Payment”) in an amount such that, after payment by Executive of all taxes (including any interest or penalties imposed with respect to such taxes), including, without limitation, any income taxes (and any interest and penalties imposed with respect thereto) and Excise Tax imposed upon the Gross-Up Payment, Executive retains an amount of the Gross-Up Payment equal to the Excise Tax imposed upon the Payments.
Change in Control Related Provisions. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, in the event that the aggregate payments or benefits to be made or afforded to Executive under Section 5 of this Agreement, together with any other payments or benefits received or to be received by Executive in connection with a Change in Control, would be deemed to include an “excess parachute payment” under §280G of the Code, then, at the election of Executive, (i) such payments or benefits shall be payable or provided to Executive over the minimum period necessary to reduce the present value of such payments or benefits to an amount which is one dollar ($1.00) less than three (3) times Executive’s “base amount” under §280G(b)(3) of the Code or (ii) the payments or benefits to be provided under this Section 5 shall be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid treatment as an excess parachute payment with the allocation of the reduction among such payments and benefits to be determined by Executive.
Change in Control Related Provisions. In each calendar year that Executive is entitled to receive payments or benefits under the provisions of this Employment Agreement, the Holding Company shall determine if an excess parachute payment (as defined in Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any successor provision thereto, (the "Code")) exists. Such determination shall be made after taking any reductions permitted pursuant to Section 280G of the Code and the regulations thereunder. Any amount determined to be an excess parachute payment after taking into account such reductions shall be hereafter referred to as the "Initial Excess Parachute Payment." As soon as practicable after a Change in Control, the Initial Excess Parachute Payment shall be determined. Upon the Date of Termination following a Change in Control, the Holding Company shall pay Executive, subject to applicable withholding requirements under applicable state or federal law, an amount equal to:
(1) twenty (20) percent of the Initial Excess Parachute Payment (or such other amount equal to the tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code); and
(2) such additional amount (tax allowance) as may be necessary to compensation Executive for the payment by Executive of state and federal income and excise taxes on the payment provided under clause (1) and on any payments under this clause (2). In computing such tax allowance, the payment to be made under clause (1) shall be multiplied by the "gross up percentage" ("GUP"). The GUP shall be determined as follows: GUP = Tax Rate -------------- 1 - Tax Rate The "Tax Rate" for purposes of computing the GUP shall be the sum of the highest marginal federal and state income and employment-related tax rates, including any applicable excise tax rates, applicable to Executive in the year in which the payment under Clause (1) is made.
(3) Notwithstanding the foregoing, if it shall subsequently be determined in a final judicial determination or a final administrative settlement to which Executive is a party that the excess parachute payment as defined in Section 4999 of the Code, reduced as described above, is more than the Initial Excess Parachute Payment (such different amount being hereafter referred to as the "Determinative Excess Parachute Payment") then the Holding Company's independent accountants shall determine the amount (the "Adjustment Amount") the Holding Company must pay to Executive in order to put Executive in the same position as Executive would have been if t...
Change in Control Related Provisions. (a) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of Section 5 of this Agreement, for any taxable year in which Executive shall be liable for the payment of an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code (or any successor provision thereto), with respect to any payment in the nature of the compensation made by the Company to (or for the benefit of) Executive pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise, the Company (or any successor thereto) shall pay to Executive an amount determined under the following formula: An amount equal to: (E x P) + X Where: