Agreement State Participation Sample Clauses

Agreement State Participation. 1. Depending upon the subject matter the working group will be addressing, DILR may decide that Agreement State representation in the group may be necessary or advisable. Agreement State participation should be strongly considered if the subject matter addressed by the working group affects Agreement States.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Agreement State Participation a. An Agreement State member should be considered to join a proposed rule working group if the Agreement States express an interest through the OAS Director of Rulemaking. In this case, the rulemaking project manager will draft an email to MSST management requesting that an Agreement State member to be added to the proposed rule working group. This request will be coordinated through ASPB and transmitted through MSST management. Once an Agreement State member is assigned to the proposed rule working group, that member will have the roles and responsibilities listed in Section IV.I of this procedure.
Agreement State Participation a. Agreement State representatives will not participate as a member(s) of the rulemaking working group during the rulemaking plan development phase unless specifically requested by OAS and agreed upon by NRC. However, for every rulemaking plan drafted by NRC staff, the OAS Director of Rulemaking will review the draft Agreement State section of the rulemaking plan and determine if Agreement State representation on the working group is desirable. If an Agreement State member is appointed to the working group, the Agreement State member will review the entire document upon completion of the draft; therefore, working groups should, if possible, consider drafting the Agreement State section early in the writing process to allow adequate time for the OAS Director of Rulemaking or the Agreement State working group member to provide feedback.
Agreement State Participation a. If the working group for the proposed rule included an Agreement State member, that same member should serve on the final rule working group as well. If an Agreement State member was not on the proposed rule working group but would like to be included in the final rule working group, that Agreement State member should coordinate participation through the OAS Director of Emerging Issues and Advocacy to participate in the final rule working group. At the request of the OAS Director of Rulemaking, the rulemaking project manager will draft an email to MSST management requesting that an Agreement State member be added to the final rule working group. This request will be coordinated through ASPB and transmitted through MSST management. Once an Agreement State member is assigned to the final rule working group, that member will have the roles and responsibilities listed in Section IV.I of this procedure.
Agreement State Participation a. An Agreement State member should be considered to join a DFR working group. ASPB should consult with the OAS Director of Rulemaking to determine whether the Agreement States would like to join the DFR working group. In this case, the rulemaking project manager will draft an email to MSST management requesting that an Agreement State member be added to the DFR working group. This request will be coordinated through ASPB and transmitted through MSST management. Once an Agreement State member is assigned to the DFR working group, that member will have the roles and responsibilities listed in Section IV.I of this procedure.
Agreement State Participation a. The OAS Director of Rulemaking or a designee serves as an ad hoc member of the CPR working group and will provide input on the rules that pertain to Agreement States. The RASB team lead (CPR working group leader) will include the OAS Director of Rulemaking or designee and the ASPB Branch Chief in the CPR distribution list to ensure that OAS is aware of potential rules that would affect Agreement States. The Rulemaking Branch Chief will also follow up with the OAS Director of Rulemaking to ensure that all rules pertaining to OAS have appropriate working group involvement.

Related to Agreement State Participation

  • Program Participation By participating in the CRF Program, Grantee agrees to:

  • COOPERATIVE PURCHASING PROGRAM PARTICIPATION Arkansas' Purchasing Law provides that local public procurement units (counties, municipalities, school districts, certain nonprofit corporations, etc.) may participate in state purchasing contracts. The contractor therefore agrees to sell to Cooperative Purchasing Program participants at the option of the program participants. Unless otherwise stated, all standard and special terms and conditions listed within the contract must be equally applied to such participants.

  • Participation Agreement The Participation Agreement (Federal Express Corporation Trust No. N679FE), dated as of June 15, 1998, as amended and restated as of October 1, 1998, among the Lessee, the Owner Trustee not in its individual capacity except as otherwise expressly provided therein, but solely as owner trustee, the Owner Participants, the Indenture Trustee not in its individual capacity except as otherwise expressly provided therein, but solely as indenture trustee, the Pass Through Trustee not in its individual capacity except as otherwise expressly provided therein, but solely as pass through trustee, and the Subordination Agent not in its individual capacity except as otherwise expressly provided therein, but solely as subordination agent.

  • Non-State Agencies Participation Terms used in this document shall have the meanings set forth in this Contract and Appendix B.

  • NON-STATE AGENCIES PARTICIPATION IN CENTRALIZED CONTRACTS New York State political subdivisions and others authorized by New York State law may participate in Centralized Contracts. These include, but are not limited to local governments, public authorities, public school and fire districts, public and nonprofit libraries, and certain other nonpublic/nonprofit organizations. See "Participation in Centralized Contracts" in Appendix B, General Specifications January 2015 22772 Project Based Information Technology Consulting (Statewide). Upon request, all eligible non-State agencies must furnish Contractors with the proper tax exemption certificates and documentation certifying eligibility to use State contracts. Questions regarding an organization's eligibility to purchase from New York State Contracts may also be directed to OGS Customer Services at 000-000-0000.

  • Mandatory Participation Participation in the Special Pay Plan is mandatory for all 24 eligible teachers.

  • Employee Participation The Employer will assist employees' participation in health promotion and health education programs. Health promotion and health education programs that have been endorsed by the Employer (Minnesota Management & Budget) will be considered to be non-assigned job-related training pursuant to Administrative Procedure 21. Approval for this training is at the discretion of the Appointing Authority and is contingent upon meeting staffing needs in the employee's absence and the availability of funds. Employees are eligible for release time, tuition reimbursement, or a pro rata combination of both. Employees may be reimbursed for up to one hundred (100) percent of tuition or registration costs upon successful completion of the program. Employees may be granted release time, including the travel time, in lieu of reimbursement.

  • Public Participation 79. This Consent Decree shall be lodged with the Court for a period of not less than 30 Days for public notice and comment in accordance with 28 C.F.R. ' 50.7. The United States reserves the right to withdraw or withhold its consent if the comments regarding the Consent Decree disclose facts or considerations indicating that the Consent Decree is inappro- priate, improper, or inadequate. Defendant consents to entry of this Consent Decree without further notice and agrees not to withdraw from or oppose entry of this Consent Decree by the Court or to challenge any provision of the Decree, unless the United States has notified Defendant in writing that it no longer supports entry of the Decree.

  • DETERMINATION OF DBE PARTICIPATION A firm must be an eligible DBE and perform a professional or technical function relating to the project. Once a firm is determined to be an eligible DBE, the total amount paid to the DBE for work performed with his/her own forces is counted toward the DBE goal. When a DBE subcontracts part of the work of its contract to another firm, the value of the subcontracted work may be counted toward DBE goals only if the subprovider is itself a DBE. Work that a DBE subcontracts to a non-DBE firm does not count toward DBE goals. A DBE subprovider may subcontract no more than 70% of a federal aid contract. The DBE subprovider shall perform not less than 30% of the value of the contract work with assistance of employees employed and paid directly by the DBE; and equipment owned or rented directly by the DBE. DBE subproviders must perform a commercially useful function required in the contract in order for payments to be credited toward meeting the contract goal. A DBE performs a commercially useful function when it is responsible for executing the work of the contract and is carrying out its responsibilities by actually performing, managing, and supervising the work involved. To perform a commercially useful function, the DBE must also be responsible, with respect to materials and supplies used on the contract, for negotiating price, determining quality and quantity, ordering the material, and installing (where applicable) and paying for the material itself . When a DBE is presumed not to be performing a commercially useful function, the DBE may present evidence to rebut this presumption. A Provider may count toward its DBE goal a portion of the total value of the contract amount paid to a DBE joint venture equal to the distinct, clearly defined portion of the work of the contract performed by the DBE. Proof of payment, such as copies of canceled checks, properly identifying the Department’s contract number or project number may be required to substantiate the payment, as deemed necessary by the Department.

  • EVIDENCE OF PARTICIPATION All Training Services delivered by the Training Provider to an Eligible Individual must be supported by Evidence of Participation in accordance with the remainder of this Clause 11 for each unit of competency, such that a reasonable judgement regarding an Eligible Individual’s participation in Training Services can be made. The Training Provider must maintain documented evidence of engagement by the Eligible Individual in the learning and/or assessment activity. Except as permitted under Clause 11.5 of this Schedule 1, to be valid, evidence must contain the Eligible Individual's name or identification number, a unit of competency identifier and a date. The Department will determine if the evidence provided is sufficient to substantiate the claim that the Eligible Individual participated in training. In addition, the following minimum specifications must be met to evidence an Eligible Individual’s engagement in Training Services activity: one point of Evidence of Participation per unit of competency must be provided if the period between the Activity Start Date and Activity End Date (inclusive) for the unit of competency is one month or less; or two points of Evidence of Participation per unit of competency must be provided if the period between the Activity Start Date and Activity End Date for the unit of competency is greater than one month, including one point within the first month and one point within the last month of training delivery and/or assessment as identified by the reported Activity End Date. Two different forms of Evidence of Participation must be used. An auditor would consider the time elapsed between the start and end date (or withdrawal) of the unit of competency and use discretion as to a reasonable demonstration of ongoing engagement by an individual in learning and/or assessment activity across the unit of competency, where one point of Evidence of Participation is one item of evidence as specified in Clause 11.5 of this Schedule 1. In instances where competency based completions are involved, and where the employer signoff has not yet been received by the Training Provider, an auditor will consider the last point of Evidence of Participation relating to training and/or assessment. The only Evidence of Participation that is acceptable under this VET Funding Contract is: evidence of work submitted relating to engagement by the Eligible Individual in the unit of competency: At a minimum, this evidence must contain the Eligible Individual’s signature, and comply with the requirements set out in Clause 11.2 of this Schedule 1. In cases where this information cannot be recorded on the work itself, separate evidence must accompany the work to allow it to be linked to the Eligible Individual, the unit of competency and date completed, for example, identification of an Eligible Individual by a client identifier and a delivery schedule or equivalent detailing how the piece of work covers the unit of competency in question, including due dates and milestones; Skills First Teacher notes based on communication between the Skills First Teacher and Eligible Individual, establishing the Eligible Individual’s involvement in the learning and/or assessment activity of the unit of competency. This includes personal interviews, telephone, e-mail, or other communication modes on the engagement of an Eligible Individual in learning and/or assessment activity of the unit of competency and may include reference to notes from another person working alongside the Skills First Teacher, for example an industry expert or workplace supervisor;

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!