Allocation Methodology. (A) The allocation methodology used by the Board has been previously provided to the Member and is reflected in Attachment B. (B) BY EXECUTING THIS AGREEMENT, THE MEMBER ACKNOWLEDGES THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY AND FURTHER AGREES TO AND HEREBY WAIVES ANY RIGHT TO CHALLENGE IN ANY FORUM OR PROCEEDING WHATSOEVER THE WCB ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY USED HEREIN AS CONTAINED IN ATTACHMENT B, PROVIDED HOWEVER, THAT THE RESULTS THEREOF WITH REGARD TO MEMBER’S PAYMENT OF THE PRO RATA ALLOCATION, AS SHOWN IN ATTACHMENT A, AND/OR JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY, ARE SUBJECT TO FUTURE RECONCILIATION AT WCB’S SOLE DISCRETION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, RECONCILIATION BASED ON ANY APPLICABLE RECOVERIES.
Allocation Methodology. The HollyFrontier Group shall xxxx the Partnership Group for the HEP Seconded Employee Expenses in accordance with the following allocation methodology (“Allocation Methodology”): The HollyFrontier Group and the Partnership Group will maintain a schedule reflecting whether each HEP Seconded Employee shall be billed based on the (a) percentage of time such HEP Seconded Employee provides Services to the Partnership Group in relation to the Assets or (b) time such HEP Seconded Employee actually spends providing Services to the Partnership Group in relation to the Assets. The HollyFrontier Group will use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain an allocation schedule reflecting the employee costs for each HEP Seconded Employee based on either the (a) percentage of time such HEP Seconded Employee provides Services to the Partnership Group in relation to the Assets or (b) time such HEP Seconded Employee actually spends providing Services to the Partnership Group in relation to the Assets. The Partnership Group has the right to review and dispute the allocation schedule prior to paying the HEP Seconded Employee Expenses to the HollyFrontier Group.
Allocation Methodology. The County will utilize the provided OSS default allocation as a consistent and equitable distribution of VOTER account funds for qualifying expenditures for all municipalities.
Allocation Methodology. Costs associated with the provision of System Services and Technology Systems (collectively “System Services Costs”) include all costs actually incurred or properly accrued by Hyatt or by any of its Affiliates including, from time to time, costs relating to the following: (i) maintaining and improving Hyatt-branded websites and reservations systems, (ii) planning, coordinating and conducting sales efforts, (iii) any costs or expenses payable to third-party vendors or employees of Hyatt or its Affiliates in connection with the rendition of such System Services, (iv) occupancy costs, (v) costs of equipment leases and capital improvements, (vi) the reasonable salaries, benefits, and expenses of personnel who manage, administer, and/or perform System Services, (vii) administrative costs, including any taxes on amounts paid, (viii) travel expenses of personnel in connection with the provision of System Services, (ix) meeting costs; rent, utilities, overhead costs, and other costs for equipment, supplies, and materials relating or allocable to the provision of System Services, and (x) other expenses that Hyatt incurs in activities reasonably related to administering or directing System Services, including conducting market research and other research and development activities, public relations, preparing advertising, promotion, and marketing materials, collecting and accounting for contributions, paying third-party providers for services relating to the reservations systems, and paying for technical and support functions. System Services Costs shall not include any amounts for Hyatt or its Affiliates’ overhead attributable to providing supervision over the management of the Hotel or over the management of any regional or shared services offices. In any case in which employees of Hyatt or its Affiliate devote less than all of their time to the provision of the applicable System Services, employee costs shall be allocated in a reasonable manner determined in good faith by Hyatt to reflect the portion of time devoted by such employees to such System Services, provided that nothing in this Section 4.10(c) intends to create an employee relationship with Owner other than with respect to (and for the avoidance of doubt) the Hotel employees, which are employed by Owner. Other shared costs such as occupancy costs, utilities, and the like relating only partially to System Services shall likewise be allocated by Hyatt to System Services Costs on a fair and reasonable basi...
Allocation Methodology. For purposes of determining the Tax consequences of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement to all parties hereto, including the character of the Skyline Members’ gain recognition under Section 751(a) of the Code, the fair market value of the assets and liabilities of Skyline shall be determined using the allocation methodology to be agreed upon by the Parties prior to the Closing (the “Allocation Methodology”). CHC, Skyline, the Surviving Company, and the Skyline Members shall file all Tax Returns in a manner consistent with the Allocation Methodology, and shall take no position before any Governmental Authority or in any legal proceeding that is inconsistent with the Allocation Methodology; provided, that (i) nothing contained herein shall prevent any party from settling in good faith any proposed deficiency or adjustment by a governmental authority based upon or arising out of the Allocation Methodology, and (ii) no party shall be required to litigate before any court any proposed deficiency or adjustment by a governmental authority challenging the Allocation Methodology.
Allocation Methodology. The portion of Plant Products and Residue Gas produced at the Plant that is attributable to Supplier’s Gas delivered to the Delivery Points under this Agreement, for purposes of Section 2 above and all other portions of the Agreement, shall be determined in the manner set forth in Exhibit D to this Agreement.
Allocation Methodology a. Description
i. Inter-Entity is allocated 50% to JHU and 50% to JHHS affiliates. This is because all intercompany transactions have both JHU and JHHS on all entries. Considerations are made each budget period as to changes that might affect the allocation process.
Allocation Methodology a. Description - Inter-Entity Shared Services is allocated 50% to JHU and 50% to JHHS affiliates. This is because all intercompany transactions have both JHU and JHHS on all entries. Considerations are made each budget period as to changes that might affect the allocation process.
b. Allocation Metrics -Allocation is 50% to JHU and 50% to JHHS Affiliates. JHHS allocates their share across the Affiliates based on the matrix provided by the Sr. Manager of Inter-Entity Shared Services on an annual basis at budget time. The matrix used is the average number of KB15Ns processed for each Business Area/Affiliate for a period of three months. The KB15N was picked as the measure because it is the primary document used for intercompany transactions.
c. Allocation Changes FY23 to FY24 – allocations are based on number of KB15N documents processed by Inter-Entity Shared Services for each affiliate. PBA PBA Description FY24 Allocation FY23 Allocation 400 BAYVIEW MEDICAL CENTER 9.6% 440 JH COMMUNITY PHYSICIANS 5.5% 455 JH EMPLOYER HEALTH PROGRAMS 0.9% 459 JHHS SUPPLY CHAIN COMPANY 0.0% 460 JHMMC PROP MGMT DIV- GRNSPRG 1.2% 462 JHMMC INTRASTAFF DIVISION 0.0% 480 XXXXX XXXXXXX HOSPITAL 40.1% 503 HEALTHCARE SC INNOVATIONS LLC 0.0% 517 JH REGIONAL SC NETWORK LLC 0.0% 520 JH INTERNATIONAL LLC 1.1% 522 MEDBIQUITOUS 0.0% 530 JHHCG CORP (GROUP) 2.4% 550 XXXXX XXXXXXX HEALTHCARE LLC 5.7% 555 XXXXX XXXXXXX IMAGING LLC 0.5% 575 JH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 2.5% 585 JHMI UTILITIES LLC 0.5% 586 ENERGY SERIVCES 1.2% 587 EMRS PROJECT 1.1% 600 SUBURBAN HOSPITAL INC 2.1% 630 XXXXXX MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 4.2% 640 XXXXXX CNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL 2.6% 650 ALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC 1.8% 670 SURGICAL CENTERS 0.1% 900 JH HOSPITAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC 0.4% 902 CRISP 0.0% 925 MHHEFA PARKING- JHH 1.4% 926 MHHEFA PARKING- BMC 0.6% Chargeback By Affiliate Total 85.5% JHHS RETAINED 14.5% 100.0% 100.0%
Allocation Methodology. In the event that Reimbursement Budget Account credits are allocated to Allocation Recipients, the Plan Administrator directs the Plan’s service provider to allocate shares of the Reimbursement Budget Account credits to the Allocation Recipients on a business day (the “Allocation Date”) which shall occur not later than the last day of the Plan Year. Each Allocation Recipient will receive a pro-rata share of the total Reimbursement Budget Account credits in the same proportion that each Allocation Recipient’s account balance as of the Allocation Date bears to the total balance of all Allocation Recipients’ accounts as of the Allocation Date. The Reimbursement Budget Account credits will be allocated among contribution sources pro-rata based on the sources in which the Allocation Recipient has a balance on the Allocation Date and among investment options based on the investment selection percentages in effect as of the Allocation Date for each such contribution source. The Plan Sponsor hereby directs MassMutual to process the transactions described below pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Plan Administrator’s Guide or which are provided to the plan sponsor for review. MassMutual has no discretion with regard to processing these transactions, and there will be no deviation from these procedures without the Plan Sponsor's written direction. MassMutual may subcontract certain aspects of these approval services to other vendors. Service Fee Fee Paid By Hardships Withdrawals: Review Withdrawal Request based on election in the Plan document $160 per approval request plus disbursement charge Participant Plan Sponsor Domestic Relations Orders: Determine that order satisfies IRS Requirement for a Qualified Domestic Relations Order $350 per approval request, plus disbursement charge Participant $350 if the request is rescinded or closed Participant In Service Withdrawal Refer to Exhibit disbursement charge D for Refer To Exhibit D Rollover: The Plan will accept eligible rollover distributions from: (Check all that apply.) a qualified plan described in Code Section 401(a) (including a 401(k) plan, profit sharing plan, defined benefit plan, stock bonus plan and money purchase plan), excluding after-tax employee contributions. a qualified plan described in Code Section 401(a) (including a 401(k) plan, profit sharing plan, defined benefit plan, stock bonus plan and money purchase plan), including after-tax employee contributions. a plan described in Code S...
Allocation Methodology. The allocation method for the pro-rata share is based on parcel frontage. The square root of each benefitting parcel’s area is used as a proxy or equivalent for a parcel’s frontage.
