Assessment of Current Performance Sample Clauses

Assessment of Current Performance. In June 2018, the College was awarded TEF silver status. TEF provider metrics indicated that our students achieve excellent outcomes. Part-time student satisfaction with assessment and feedback and academic support are exceptionally high and above benchmark. The level of part-time student satisfaction with teaching and progression rates to employment or further study are consistent with benchmark. We achieve high levels of full-time student satisfaction, and full-time continuation rates are also above benchmark. In line with the requirements of this Access Plan and Participation Agreement, the College has assessed its current performance against the five “under-represented groups” which are recognised nationally as priority target groups: In Halton, there are 22.3% of residents with higher education qualifications compared with a national average of 37.1%. In addition, the progression of young people to higher education across the Liverpool City Region is variable. In Knowsley, Liverpool and Halton, less than 28% of young residents participate in Higher Education. (Source: HEFCE Polar 3). The majority of our Higher Education students are consistently drawn from areas of least participation in Higher Education. Our TEF data indicates 65% recruited from POLAR quintiles 1 and 2 in 2015/16 and 63% in 2016/17 (TEF 3 metrics). The College has an institution-wide approach to supporting widening participation students to ensure that they continue in their studies. The College has been successful in increasing the number of Higher Education students from a disadvantaged postcode. Category 2016-17 2017-18 Difference % of HE students from a disadvantaged postcode 5% 47% +42% Our 2017-18 enrolment data indicates that 47% of Riverside College Higher Education students reside in a deprived area postcode. It is, therefore, a continuing target of the college to attract local residents onto its Higher Education provision and in doing so help to increase the number of Halton residents who enter into higher education, and to address this under representation. The proportion of males and female students changed in 2017/18 with 38% male and 62% female; against 41% male and 59% female in 2016/17. White males from lower socio economic groups are amongst those most underrepresented in higher education nationally and as such it is a target of the college to support white working class boys to progress their study onto full or part-time Higher Education. In 2014-15 and 2016-17, 100...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Assessment of Current Performance. 1. This Access and Participation Plan between the University of Oxford and the Office for Students (OfS) covers full-time Home/EU undergraduate and PGCE students admitted in the academic year 2019-20. It builds on the experience and evidence gained by the University and its colleges in recent years. Autonomy and diversity characterise the collegiate University, and our access activities and arrangements embody these qualities. 2. In all areas of work on access, widening participation, and admissions, including in writing this Plan, and the associated targets, the University has addressed its responsibility under the Public Sector Equality Duty to have due regard to the need to: eliminate unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation and other conduct prohibited by the Equality Act and advance equality of opportunity between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not. 3. The University’s Equality Policy includes a commitment to ‘encourage applications for study and employment from the widest pool of potential candidates, especially where representation is disproportionately low and to take steps to meet the needs of individuals from protected groups where these are different from the needs of others (xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx.xx/eop/policy/equality-policy/).
Sample 1

Related to Assessment of Current Performance

  • Past Performance The Government will evaluate the contractor's performance on the NETCENTS-2 Orders provided in Exhibit B, CDRL B001. The PCO will determine the quality of the work performed based on an integrated assessment of data obtained in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS) and information obtained from Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) channels, interviews with customers, program managers and/or contracting officers for NETCENTS-2 task orders. Based on the contractor performance records above, the PCO will determine if there is an expectation that the contractor will successfully perform the required efforts under the unrestricted NetOps and Infrastructure Solutions contract.

  • Monitoring of Contract Performance The Contractor shall comply with the monitoring arrangements set out in the Monitoring Requirements Schedule including, but not limited to, providing such data and information as the Contractor may be required to produce under the Contract.

  • EVALUATING PERFORMANCE 7.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out: 7.1.1 the standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s perfor- xxxxx; and 7.1.2 the intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 7.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force. 7.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames. 7.4 The Employee’s performance will measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s IDP. 7.5 The annual performance appraisal will involve: 7.5.1. Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the perfor- xxxxx plan: (a) Each KPA should be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance indicators have been met and with due regard to ad hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPA. (b) An indicative rating on the five-point scale should be provided for each KPA. (c) The applicable assessment rating calculator (refer to paragraph 7.5.3. below) must then be used to add the scores and calculate a final KPA score.

  • Lawful Performance Vendor shall abide by all Federal, State and Local Laws, Ordinances, Regulations, and Statutes as may be related to the performance of duties under this agreement. In addition, all applicable permits and licenses required shall be obtained by the vendor, at vendor’s sole expense.

  • Continuing Performance (a) The obligations under this Agreement continue until satisfied in full and do not merge with any action performed or document executed by any Party for the purposes of performance of this Agreement. (b) Any representation in this Agreement survives the execution of any document for the purposes of, and continues after, performance of this Agreement. (c) Any indemnity given by any Party under this Agreement: (i) constitutes a liability of that Party separate and independent from any other liability of that Party under this Agreement or any other agreement; and (ii) survives and continues after performance of this Agreement.

  • Contract Performance C19.1 The Contractor shall ensure that: C19.1.1 the Goods conform in all respects with the Specification and, where applicable, with any sample or performance demonstration approved by the Authority; C19.1.2 the Goods operate in accordance with the relevant technical specifications and correspond with the requirements of the Specification and any particulars specified in the Contract; C19.1.3 the Goods conform in all respects with all applicable Laws; and C19.1.4 the Goods are free from defects in design, materials and workmanship and are fit and sufficient for all the purposes for which such Goods are ordinarily used and for any particular purpose made known to the Contractor by the Authority.

  • Excuse for Nonperformance or Delayed Performance Except with respect to defaults of subcontractors, Contractor/Vendor shall not be in default by reason of any failure in performance of this contract in accordance with its terms (including any failure by Contractor/Vendor to make progress in the prosecution of the work hereunder which endangers such performance) if Contractor/Vendor has notified the Commission or designee within 15 days after the cause of the delay and the failure arises out of causes such as: acts of God; acts of the public enemy; acts of the State and any other governmental entity in its sovereign or contractual capacity; fires; floods; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; strikes or other labor disputes; freight embargoes; or unusually severe weather. If the failure to perform is caused by the failure of a subcontractor to perform or to make progress, and if such failure arises out of causes similar to those set forth above, Contractor/Vendor shall not be deemed to be in default, unless the services to be furnished by the subcontractor were reasonably obtainable from other sources in sufficient time to permit Contractor to meet the contract requirements. Upon request of Contractor, the Commission or designee shall ascertain the facts and extent of such failure, and, if such officer determines that any failure to perform was occasioned by any one or more of the excusable causes, and that, but for the excusable cause, Contractor’s progress and performance would have met the terms of the contract, the delivery schedule shall be revised accordingly, subject to the rights of the State under the clause entitled (in fixed-price contracts, “Termination for Convenience,” in cost-reimbursement contracts, “Termination”). (As used in this Paragraph of this clause, the term “subcontractor” means subcontractor at any tier).

  • Continuing Contract Performance Pending final resolution of a Claim, except as otherwise agreed in writing or as provided in Section 9.7 and Article 13, the Design-Builder shall proceed diligently with performance of the Contract and the Owner shall continue to make payments in accordance with the Design-Build Documents.

  • Due Performance Each party to this Agreement undertakes the obligation that the other's expectation of receiving due performance will not be impaired. When reasonable grounds for insecurity arise with respect to the performance of either party, the other may, in writing, demand adequate assurance of due performance and until such written assurance is received may, if commercially reasonable, suspend any performance for which the agreed return has not been received.

  • Excuse from performance of obligations If the Affected Party is rendered wholly or partially unable to perform its obligations under this Agreement because of a Force Majeure Event, it shall be excused from performance of such of its obligations to the extent it is unable to perform on account of such Force Majeure Event; provided that: (a) the suspension of performance shall be of no greater scope and of no longer duration than is reasonably required by the Force Majeure Event; (b) the Affected Party shall make all reasonable efforts to mitigate or limit damage to the other Party arising out of or as a result of the existence or occurrence of such Force Majeure Event and to cure the same with due diligence; and (c) when the Affected Party is able to resume performance of its obligations under this Agreement, it shall give to the other Party notice to that effect and shall promptly resume performance of its obligations hereunder.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!