Asset Summary. Marco will provide the Client with a summary of all discovered assets and users during the onboarding of this Product Agreement. Marco will configure discovered assets and users per the terms of this Product Agreement.
a) Client shall promptly review the discovered asset and user summary and report any missing assets, users, or any discovered inaccuracies.
b) Client shall promptly notify Marco through a service ticket (change request) about asset or user changes so that proper re-configuration or loading of Products can be deployed or configured.
c) Client acknowledges that Marco will be delayed in, or unable to, effectively and efficiently provide the Products without a complete and accurate Asset Summary and agrees that Marco shall have no liability to Client or any third party arising out of such delay or inability to perform.
Asset Summary. Xxxxx will provide the Client with a summary of all discovered assets and users during the onboarding of this Product Agreement. Xxxxx will configure discovered assets and users per the terms of this Product Agreement.
a) Client shall promptly review the discovered asset and user summary and report any missing assets, users, or any discovered inaccuracies.
b) Client shall promptly notify Xxxxx through a service ticket (change request) about asset or user changes so that proper re-configuration or loading of Products can be deployed or configured.
c) Client acknowledges that Xxxxx will be delayed in, or unable to, effectively and efficiently provide the Products without a complete and accurate Asset Summary and agrees that Xxxxx shall have no liability to Client or any third party arising out of such delay or inability to perform.
Asset Summary. Client shall provide Marco with information it needs to carry out this Threat Hunting Agreement including a list of all IT equipment, such as personal computers and servers; software and operating systems; and third party IT services it is using in its IT environment (“Asset Summary”) and Client Information and Access (defined below). Client acknowledges that Marco will be delayed in, or unable to, effectively and efficiently provide the Products if Client fails to comply with its obligations under this paragraph and understands that the Prices may be increased if additional Client equipment, software, or operating systems are disclosed following Marco’s Price quotation to Client. Client agrees that Marco shall have no liability to Client or any third party arising out of such delay. Client shall promptly report to Marco any changes to the Asset Summary or Client Information and Access.
Asset Summary. Client shall provide Marco with information it needs to carry out this IdentifyIT Agreement including list of all IT equipment, such as personal computers and servers; software and operating systems; and third party IT services it is using in its IT environment (“Asset Summary”). Marco will review the Asset Summary with Client. Client shall provide Marco with information it reasonably requests concerning the Asset Summary,
a) equipment, which is professional grade and uses a business class operating system, meets manufacturer current specifications; and
b) operating systems and other software which are business class, meet the software publisher’s and/or vendor’s current program specifications and are supported under the software publisher’s and/or vendor’s current defined lifecycle policy; and
c) all Designated Users existing on the Client’s domain; and
d) equipment, operating systems and other software having the current capability to be assessed by Marco remotely; and
e) firewalls, switches, routers, servers, storage area networks, load-balancers, intrusion detection systems domain name systems and other infrastructure devices having Simple Network Management Protocol (“SNMP”) 2 or 3 enabled and configured. The above items are referred to herein collectively as “Minimum Specifications.”
Asset Summary. In December 1999, a wholly owned subsidiary of EES (NEWCO) engaged in the Marketing of natural gas, electricity and other commodities, sold 25,000 common shares and 75,000 special warrants to an outside investor group for $100 million. EES contributed certain assets in exchange for 75,000 common shares and 225,000 special warrants. Of the $100 million of proceeds received by XXXXX, $55.7 million was allocated to the 25,000 common shares issued (or $2,226.52 per share) and $44.3 million to the 75,000 special warrants issued (or $591.16 per special warrant). Based on this valuation, the 225,000 special warrants held by EES have a value of $133.001 million (based on an implied enterprise value of NEWCO as a whole at $400 million). Since the valuation of NEWCO, and therefore the valuation of the special warrants held by EES, has been determined by the private placements, our ability to rely on this valuation is sound. XXXXX entered into arrangements for the issuance of an additional 46,517 special warrants at cost of $2,150 per special warrant to a new third party investor. Closing of the issuance occurred in July 2000. The price of these additional special warrants is based on a NEWCO enterprise value of $1 billion for total proceeds of $100 million. Based on this valuation, the 148,877 remaining special warrants held by EES (the original 225,000 warrants held by EES less the 33,832 warrants monetized on March 31, 2000 and 42,291 warrants monetized on June 29, 2000 are valued at $320,085,550). special warrants are valued at $2,150 per special warrant. The special warrants to be monetized in the Hawaii 125‑0 structure are McGarret Assets as outlined in the Methodology for Asset Valuation (Exhibit E) of the Amended and Restated Facility Agreement dated May 31, 2000.
